GF4 MX440 or GF2 TI

[JaPuLeX]

I am planning on upgrading my video card. I am also on a budget so I have to get the lower end card. My choices are the GF4 MX440 and the GF2 TI or are there anything better? I'm lookin for a Geforce base card. They both cost about the same and I was wondering which is better? Please have some comments if you know about these card. Thank you.

Spec:
Athlon XP 1900+
128 PC2100 DDR + 256 PC2400 DDR
TNT2 34MB
Sound Blaster Live!
MSI KT266
Win98SE

 

[Guest]

I have just got the system below and I asked for a GF4 MX440 but the people I bought it off couldn't get it to work so I had to get a GF2 Ti instead.

Specs:

AMD Athlon XP 1700+ Processor
Gigabyte 7VTXE KT266A Dual BIOS DDR Motherboard
256M PC2100 DDR RAM Kingmax/kingston
Winfast Titanium TH 64MB DDR (GF2 Ti)

 

[phsstpok]

In raw speed I think the Geforce2 Ti is little faster. The MX440 will might have the edge if you use FSAA.

However, in the under $100 video card market my top choice would be a Radeon 7500.

Oh, I forgot. You said you prefer a Geforce based card. Tough choice. I think whichever one is cheapest. I was eyeing a nice Gainward Geforce2 Ti450 refurb for $69 at Newegg.

<b>I have so many cookies I now have a FAT problem!</b>

 

[Crashman]

Why a GeForce card? The Radeon 8500 Retail cost around $150 and is faster than either of those cards by a sizable margin!


What's the frequency, Kenneth?