No, the 4200 is still in the waiting. They don't want to kill the GF3s they still have in stock however, so they are waiting on it.
The other issue they may have is the 4200 specs might have it down as slow as a GF3 500, depending on how far they drop it.
People are willing to spend the extra $100+ for the 4400 and 4600 at the moment anyway, so Nvidia may decide to ignore it and take the money they can.
The under $200 catagory is still the realm of the 8500 though. Its fast, cheep, stable, and still has plenty of potential. It also might be some of why Nvidia isn't releasing it's 4200. They may have speced the chip down far enough that the 8500 catches it in performance.
I would like to see the GF4 4400, 4600, ti-500, and the 8500 64 and 128 square off against eachother using the latest drivers available (whatever the detonators are, and the ATI 6052 drivers). In several OpenGL apps, as well as D3D apps, the 8500 should do much better than in previous reviews, and it would give everyone a good idea of the difference between the top 3 cards (4600, 4400, 8500)
Bad trolls Bad trolls... Whacha gonna do... Whacha gonna do when they post here too...