My gfx card benches too slow....suggestions?

My system:

AMD Athlon-XP 2000+
Asus A7V333-R
VIA KT333
512k PC2700 DDR RAM
Asus GeForce 4 4400 128ram
Windows XP

My system benches 200 fps on Quake 3 v1.17 (Demo001)
1024x768/32bit/85Hz. This is the same result as the card performed on an ASUS A7V266-E board in some of the benches posted on this site. What gives? It should be much faster? I have all my BIOS settings tweaked ...CL2 etc..suggestions?
5 answers Last reply
More about card benches slow suggestions
  1. The KT333 is ~1% (give or take 1%) faster than the KT266A on average.

    :wink: <b><i>"A penny saved is a penny earned!"</i></b> :wink:
  2. how would you explain the desparity noted here:

    http://www.tomshardware.com/mainboard/02q1/020220/index.html

    This looks to be more than 1%. What am I missing?
  3. I said give or take. So maybe 0-2%.

    :wink: <b><i>"A penny saved is a penny earned!"</i></b> :wink:
  4. THG was running Win2K not XP. That's probably your difference.

    <b>I have so many cookies I now have a FAT problem!</b>
  5. Sorry, in my other post I was just commenting on what I saw at the link you provided. Looking at the VGA card review I see your complaint.

    <A HREF="http://www6.tomshardware.com/graphic/02q2/020418/vgacharts-03.html" target="_new">http://www6.tomshardware.com/graphic/02q2/020418/vgacharts-03.html</A>

    Sorry, I have no idea why THG scores 13 FPS more on the same hardware/software.

    <b>I have so many cookies I now have a FAT problem!</b>
Ask a new question

Read More

Graphics Cards Asus Windows XP Graphics