27000 in 3d mark ?

[nexus_alpha]

<A HREF="http://www.3dfxzone.it/forumzone/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1389&FORUM_ID=43&CAT_ID=15&Topic_Title=Radeon+9500+MAXX+!!!&Forum_Title=Altri+produttori" target="_new">http://www.3dfxzone.it/forumzone/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1389&FORUM_ID=43&CAT_ID=15&Topic_Title=Radeon+9500+MAXX+!!!&Forum_Title=Altri+produttori</A> the reason why I am posting is cause I need help why this is fake. I couldn't figure it out it looks legit but I ain't that stupid.

Also showing it just for kicks and a few laughs cause things kinda tense round here.

 

[pr497]

*ahem*...hack...*ahem*...
or maybe the R300 may perform at that level...who knows?
dang...~400 fps in car chase....

<b>Who fixed <font color=red>ATI</font color=red>'s leaky faucet??</b>

 

[Jake75]

Pfah!
No match against my Geforce2Mx.


Well, quite nice results if it´s true...that´s the least you could say.

<font color=blue>Current Mode :</font color=blue> Drunk Stoned <font color=red>RELAXED</font color=red>

 

[cakecake]

Babelfish translation to English (for us poor blokes):

A beta tester by ATI Technologies Inc. has sended these to me turns out obtained to you with a sample of pre series of the card that presumablly it will come commercialized with the name of Radeon 9500 MAXX. It turns out to you measured are of all respect, than you say some?

This little cathode light of mine, I'm gonna let it shine!

 

[UoMDeacon]

Perhaps, or it may be that speed hack that makes the computer think that it is running faster than it actually is. I remember a WCPUID screen shot of a PIII running at 30GHz This was the same hack that CS players were using.

 

[chuck232]

Well I noticed he didn't run a lot of the tests, and yet he still got that kinda score. Seems highly unlikely.

What's the deal with lampshades, I mean it's a lamp, why would you want a shade?

 

[eden]

But man it'd be nice if the R300 was actually doing this....

--
Intel and AMD sitting under a tree, P-R-O-C-E-S-S-I-N-G!

 

[bront]

Interesting that SiS Sandra lists it as the Radeon 9500 QDR... Does that mean it's using quad-datarate memory?(Rambus? QDR Sdram?)

Seems a bit too much for me, The numbers are likely inflated a bit by him not "running" the other tests as well, and that makes me a bit suspicious.

We can only hope that it's true ::rool:::

It can be said that smoking is one of the leading cause of statistics.

 

[chuck232]

But doesn't the non-included tests lower your score. Like for every test you don't do you'd be losing points compared to a test where you do use them. If that's the case, then these numbers are basically impossible without some tampering. If you look at the best 3D Mark2K1SE score, it uses a P4 oc/ed to 3.2GHz and a GF4 Ti4600 overclocked to 391/783 core/mem. Still it only got 16130 points. Now compare the tests that the 2 did, and you see the R300 is anywhere from 40% to 90% faster in the test. Yet the score is already 70% better and it didn't even do half the tests.

Plus I'm sure it really wouldn't be all that hard to take a screen shot, transfer it into paint and do some "tweaking" and there you go 27000 points!!!! WOOO.... No... If they can post those scores into the Online Result Browser and I see it with my own eyes, I'll believe it, but not right now.

What's the deal with lampshades, I mean it's a lamp, why would you want a shade?

 

[bront]

In general, the less tests you do, the easier it is to get a higher 3DMark score. That's why I generaly don't give stock to people who only run the 4 game tests.

Also, the driver information doesn't look right. Driver version 5.00? Rage9500 tweek? Overclocker? This stuff wouldn't be in a beta driver, and it definately wouldn't be called Rage9500 tweek if it was.

Also, it says 2X radeon... this could be 2 9500s in SLA mode? Would that make this realistic?

English is phun.

 

[lhgpoobaa]

and dont forget actively cooled with liquid nitrogen!

<font color=green>Proud member of THG's</font color=green> <font color=blue>Den Of Thieves</font color=blue> :lol:

 

[cakecake]

Well, speaking of theoretical numbers, the National Security Agency has a supercomputer that monitors radio data all around the world and intercepts transmissions of all kinds. The computer can compute:

1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 operations a second.

So much for the Top 500, huh?

This little cathode light of mine, I'm gonna let it shine!

 

[chuck232]

That would be a unreasonable comparison. That's like saying well my land speed record breaking jet vehicle can go faster than your 50 year old ford...

What's the deal with lampshades, I mean it's a lamp, why would you want a shade?

 

[cakecake]

Nah, it's just proof that the government really did shoot down a UFO and stole its technology.

This little cathode light of mine, I'm gonna let it shine!