Archived from groups: alt.games.diablo2 (
More info?)
"Alan Ladd" <OnlyALadd68@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:49e201t5shca8bt220o8pk7m2c77a9477p@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 08:34:40 -0700, "paul" <nospam.riever@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"doodles" <tomfulton53nospammer@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:tnZLd.12312$6P5.10901@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com...
>>> Wake up...there is a difference between dueling and PKing, and the
>>> original
>>> poster made that clear. What is hard to understand about that?
>>> Personally,
>>> I don't duel because I don't have the skill, and I think anyone who does
>>> duel is probably a better D2 player than I am. My extensive experience
>>> with
>>> PKers is that they almost invariably cheat, and nearly always kill
>>> characters substantially lower in level than them. You used the phrase
>>> "all
>>> should strive not to sabotage another's enjoyment of the game", and I
>>> agree
>>> with that sentiment. My experience with duelers is that they follow it
>>> as
>>> well. My experience with PKers is that their entire purpose is to do
>>> just
>>> that. Frustrated and antisocial teenagers, for the most part, but that
>>> is
>>> of course conjecture.
>>>
>>> You, on the other hand, don't have the foggiest idea how to have a
>>> polite
>>> conversation. The original poster was polite and asked a reasonable
>>> question.
>>>
>>
>>first of all, i was not impolite to the original poster. however..., the
>>original poster lumped PK'ers and PvP'ers into the same bucket. you have
>>largely done the same thing. all i did was to point out that there is a
>>difference and that it is not fair to lump us all together. it was a rude
>>thing to do. i was personally insulted by the point of the thread. i said
>>so. I have played this game since very shortly after the original Dialbo
>>came out, LONG before Helfire was released, so don't play "im the veteran
>>so
>>listen to me"
>>
>>it may be your experience that PKers are all jerks. it has been MY
>>experience that most or respectable decent duelers. a handful of jerks can
>>begin to look like a crowd if you are narrowly focused on the end of your
>>nose (if you don't believe me, look in the mirror. YOU think you represent
>>the majority opinion,... don't you?).
>>
>>so you go now, and have a nice life. but next time you think about
>>insulting
>>a very large number of people for what a couple of people have done to
>>insult you, remember me. bully's will not be tolerated, even in this
>>forum.
>>
>>there. NOW i have been impolite to someone (you). now go and crawl back
>>under your rock
>>
>>paul
>>arizona
>>
>
> Please allow me to step in before this gets worse. It seems what you
> are arguing is over a matter of semantics. You seem to refer to
> yourself as a PKer (Player Killer) even though you are what is
> commonly referred to as a PVPer or Dueler. A PKer according to general
> concensus is someone who comes in to a game, declares hostility and
> tries to kill as many players in that game as possible. The game
> generally is a questing/levelling game. The game is not a duelers
> game. No one else in the game had any intention of going PVP. Only the
> PKer had the intention of battling other players.
>
> This post and responses to it are about not letting the PKers get
> their joy by getting their hands on a possibly deadly weapon. Whether
> or not it is a good weapon is not really the topic nor are the
> PVPers/Duelers.
>
> I didn't see the original poster lumping PKers and PVPers in the same
> category. The way I read it was that the original poster was having a
> moral dilemma of whether or not he wanted to help empower a possible
> PKer by giving him/her a good weapon. I, personally, commend him for
> having this sort of ethics. It is a bit pointless especially since the
> weapon in question is not as good as he thought and the fact that it
> is SC in which case getting hostiled is just a case of major
> irritation rather than loss of hours of playing. So to the OP, go
> ahead and trade away. If you can't use it, someone else might find
> good value in it.
>
>
> Alan
> --
> USWest - SonofJorEl, SonofJorEl2-3 Ladder SC
> USEast - SonofJorEl, SonofJorEl2-4 Ladder & Non, SC & HC
fair enough. it HAS devolved into an argument over semantics, and that was
not my point. i have had my say, and i will quietly (and peacefully)
withdraw.
paul
"riever"