Tom's Hardware > Forum > Old Man/Woman's Club > Other > Lord of the Rings

Lord of the Rings

Forum Old Man/Woman's Club : Other - Lord of the Rings

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Can't believe nobody has posted anything about this film yet...and we call ourselves "nerds" :wink: . At least I do.

Anyway, anybody else seen this film yet? I just saw it. Now, I read the books and enjoyed them, but I certainly was never really that into them.

The film was really excellent, though. I went in with rather low expectations and I was happily stunned to find out that the film was quite good.

My friends comment: "The film feels exactly like the old Star Wars movies <b>did</b>, and how the new Star Wars movie <b>didn't</b>, but <b>should</b>."

I know exactly what he means, and I agree.

Anyways, anybody else see the flick yet? Opinions?

<b>ßunn¥§troker 0wn§ j00!</b>

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

I have never read the Lord of the Rings.
When I was younger I like the Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy series by Douglas Adams.


<font color=red><i>Happy Canuck</i>!</font color=red> ' :wink: '

Reply to zpyrd

Probably will go see this film. Not for small kids apparently, correct ?
As for hitchhiking threwout the galaxie, you know me, sounds grrrrrrrrrrrrrrreat ! Will eventually get to those books. Have heard about them before.

Pike

Electric coolaid for everyone, except me, never touch the stuff !

Reply to pike

I just got back from seeing it. A little slow in some parts and a lot of crying and hugging but overall I liked it. The special effects make Star Wars (the new one) look like South Park.
Ok maybe not that bad but there really is a lot of eye candy in this movie.

Thx & Cya


<font color=green> 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 f6?? </font color=green>

Reply to Lowlypawn

i think they should have done the hobbit first.

the hobbit would be much more effective going from book to film

- Know thyself
- Seek
- Love
- Cherish Life
- And do not Yield!

Reply to lhgpoobaa

I saw a review on tv tonight and Ebert & robert split their thumbs up/down decision.
But I cant wait alot of my friends saw it today and the really liked it.

How long will it take for bill to make a stable and secure os?
15 years and counting!

Reply to vader1882

I never read the books. Took my son to see it yesterday, and I found it to be about 3 hours too long. However, my son enjoyed it.

<font color=blue>This is a Forum, not a playground. Treat it with Respect.</font color=blue>

Reply to jlbigguy

I saw it, I thought it was excellent. It didn't feel like 3 hours long. However, it is not a great adaptation of the book. To truly adapt the book to film, it would have to become a extensive TV miniseries or a 4 hour movie. I think some of the Tolkein purists will be upset. If you read the books then I suggest you go in with an open mind. This movie seems to be hit or miss, either people love it or hate it.

Blah, Blah Blahh, Blahh, blahh blah blahh, blah blah.

Reply to Pettytheft

Ohh yeah and take it easy on the giant 40oz sodas, or you'll have to get up and run the the bathroom a couple of times.

Blah, Blah Blahh, Blahh, blahh blah blahh, blah blah.

Reply to Pettytheft

I saw it on Friday night and then again on Saturday afternoon (Saturday was planned, Friday night was last-minute). I was neither diappointed nor impressed. The movie was pretty much exactly how I expected it to be. Elrond and Galadriel sucked, all the other characters were awesome. I watched X-Men last night, kinda strange to see Gandalf as Magneto :)

Anyhow, I agree with the comment comparing LoTR and Star Wars. They also should've done the Hobbit first, but they did a good job of (quickly) explaining what happened. Maybe they'll do it as a prequel. $45 million is nowhere near what the movie should've gotten, though.

<font color=orange>Quarter</font color=orange> <font color=blue>Pounder</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Inside</font color=orange>

Reply to FatBurger

Is the hobbit part of the same series as LOTR. I never knew that. What else is in the same series cos I read that the ending is sudden on LOTR and they were screening sequels.

<font color=purple><b>Techie2001</font color=purple></b>
<i>(Crazy Alien)</i>
If it ain't broke, Don't fix it. :wink:

Reply to Anonymous

The first one written was the Simarrilian (sp?). That's basically a history of Middle Earth, really boring. Then the Hobbit, and then the LoTR trilogy was written over a space of 12 years.

<font color=orange>Quarter</font color=orange> <font color=blue>Pounder</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Inside</font color=orange>

Reply to FatBurger

So theres five in all.

Do the same characters, senarios pop up throughout the series. Or is each one completely segregated from the last.

<font color=purple><b>Techie2001</font color=purple></b>
<i>(Crazy Alien)</i>
If it ain't broke, Don't fix it. :wink:

Reply to Anonymous

The Simallaricum and the Hobbit could be considered as stand alone books. The rest follow the Trilogy. However many of the characters from the Hobbit return in the Lord of the Rings.

Blah, Blah Blahh, Blahh, blahh blah blahh, blah blah.

Reply to Pettytheft

LOTR hasn't made anything near what it should or hopefully will. Blame me if you will though. I would have seen it twice by now if it wasn't for finals and the fact that I want to finish reading the book before seeing it. I never seem to finish the book...

<font color=red>God</font color=red> <font color=blue>Bless</font color=blue> <font color=red>America!</font color=red>

Reply to dhlucke

I bet that they could go and film if they so choose to. I also wish that they would now that Fellowship of the Rings is in the theaters. Since the numbers ($$$) are good they might just do it. It's all about the money.

I am quite pleased that they stuck fairly well to the book. A little off in the beginning and it went into the second book a little. I quess that you have to use discression. Also I never really understood how evil Suraman The White was. I thought that they did an excellent job with the characters, costumes, effects, etc.

<b>"The events of my life are quite inconsequential.." - Dr. Evil</b> :lol:

Reply to bum_jcrules

i have never read any of the books, however ive seen the cartoons from when i was little. i thought they did one hell of a job with the overall movie. the best part of the movie are the scenes with liv tyler. god@#$#$m what a babe, jesus christ. but all in all it was a great movie. really liv tyler made the movie for me.

<i>Turn around and smell what you don't see... here's a mirror, behind there is a screen</i>

Reply to jmycal

Calm down or I'll be forced to hose you off :eek:

Liv Tyler wasn't too bad, I'll have to agree. Galadriel wasn't that great, and Elrond plain sucked. All the other characters besides those two were awesome.

<font color=orange>Quarter</font color=orange> <font color=blue>Pounder</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Inside</font color=orange>

Reply to FatBurger

The elf Legolas was the coolest character in the movie. Elven archers never seem to tranfer over to movies well but this was an exception. He kicks ass with that bow.

Elrond wasnt all that bad. I think the way they used Gimli the dwarf as the comic relief is what bothered me. But that's only comparing his book character to the movie character.

Blah, Blah Blahh, Blahh, blahh blah blahh, blah blah.

Reply to Pettytheft

I don't think the book and movie Gimlis were too much different.

I agree, Legolas was pretty good with that bow. He had to have practiced for a while to get that fast. I loved it when he stabbed the orc through his eye slit with an arrow, then shot the same arrow into another orc. Hmm...maybe that was a stunt double. Pretty impressive, though.

<font color=orange>Quarter</font color=orange> <font color=blue>Pounder</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Inside</font color=orange>

Reply to FatBurger

Well, I finally saw it. What a movie! Very impressive. Ya, I know it doesn't totally stick to the book (they kinda screwed up the timeline from Hobbiton to Rivendell), but it's still probably the best book-to-movie adaptation I've ever seen. I loved the cave troll. When do the next ones come out?

Gotta have the box DVD set, mmmmmm.

Drivin' in a winter wonderland

Martin, MI

Reply to digital_trucker

they are space 1 year a[aty in t here realse so in decmber

<font color=red>Gasoline + Fire</font color=red><font color=green> Can be a lot of fun</font color=green> :smile: :smile: :smile:

Reply to wapaaga

I might go ahead and buy the individual dvd's then the boxed set later.

<b>If you make a sytem that even an idiot can use, only an idiot will use it!!</b>

Reply to Yahiko81

They didn't really specify the timeline, but they left out Tom Bombadil and the Barrow Downs.

I'll have to agree on Yahiko on that one. Individual DVD's as well as the boxed set, Director's Cut, Special Edition, Collector's Edition, etc.

<font color=orange>Quarter</font color=orange> <font color=blue>Pounder</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Inside</font color=orange>

Reply to FatBurger
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Old Man/Woman's Club > Other > Lord of the Rings
Go to:

There are 1273 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them