NV30 performance...

rubikian

Distinguished
May 20, 2002
557
0
18,980
I don't understand their words in this page but look at their benchmark...is it true or not...you'll be surprised to see 3Dmark reaches more than 25K... This is NV30 you know...

<A HREF="http://www.darkcrow.co.kr/newsdirectory/content.asp?idx=1166" target="_new">http://www.darkcrow.co.kr/newsdirectory/content.asp?idx=1166</A>
 

Cooldoud

Distinguished
Sep 14, 2002
59
0
18,630
A nice fake indeed... However I wouldn't be bothered if the NV30 really reached this performance level :)

--
<font color=red>WARNING: This hint is not supported by AMD, ATI, Intel, nVIDIA nor myself !</font color=red>
 

Ghostdog

Distinguished
May 28, 2002
702
0
18,980
If you think that the 9700 only jumped about 3000 from the TI4600. A nicely overclocked 9700Pro reaches 21k though, but NV30 would have to be one killer card if it would jump 10000 points just like that. Definetly a fake.

<font color=red>I´m starting to feel like a real computer consultant.</font color=red>
 

vacs

Distinguished
Aug 30, 2002
239
0
18,680
those benchmarks are actually not really fakes! Those results of the nv30 are just the presumed scores based on internals information leaks at nvidia which first appeared at reactorcritical's website.

Of course, there is one small problem with those 3dmark presumed scores: if the graphiccard power doubles, the 3dmark result won't double! There will be just a merely 20% to 30% increase in points since the 3dmark also depends on the CPU performance. So the 3dmark results do not represent in any way the real performance of a nv30, since also at the time those information leaked at nvidia, the nv30 wasn't taped out...
 

Ghostdog

Distinguished
May 28, 2002
702
0
18,980
I presume ATI´s next card will give us 53456 3D marks :smile:

<font color=red>I´m starting to feel like a real computer consultant.</font color=red>