When I go to the city view, I see the squares that the citizens of the city
are (or could be) working. Does that mean that all that space between my
cities that does NOT show up when I go to a city view is wasted? Is
irrigation and mining pointless on those spaces?
Thanks.
> When I go to the city view, I see the squares that the citizens of the
city
> are (or could be) working. Does that mean that all that space between my
> cities that does NOT show up when I go to a city view is wasted? Is
> irrigation and mining pointless on those spaces?
> Thanks.
>
yes
--
From Adam Webb, Overlag
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.769 / Virus Database: 516 - Release Date: 24/09/2004
Any improvements outside city squares are useless, except for
roads/railroads connecting cities. Also, if you find a resource that is
outside of your territory you can build a road leading to it and a colony on
top of the resource.
"Adam Webb" <adam@ajmysecondname.eclipse.co.uk> kirjoitti
viestissä:JfKdnbt_RK0BUcTcRVn-vg@eclipse.net.uk...
>> When I go to the city view, I see the squares that the citizens of the
> city
>> are (or could be) working. Does that mean that all that space between my
>> cities that does NOT show up when I go to a city view is wasted? Is
>> irrigation and mining pointless on those spaces?
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> yes
>
> --
> From Adam Webb, Overlag
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.769 / Virus Database: 516 - Release Date: 24/09/2004
>
>
"Wayne1127" <wayne1127@nospam.aol.com> wrote in
news:efe29bb7211091f2ebf143ec0ef63b7e@localhost.talkaboutgaming.com:
> When I go to the city view, I see the squares that the citizens of the city
> are (or could be) working. Does that mean that all that space between my
> cities that does NOT show up when I go to a city view is wasted?
Yes.
> Is Irrigation and mining pointless on those spaces?
> Thanks.
>
Absolutely.
You might want to read up on OCP other city placement strategies on
civfanatics.com to reduce this wastage.
"Adam Webb" <adam@ajmysecondname.eclipse.co.uk> wrote in message
news:JfKdnbt_RK0BUcTcRVn-vg@eclipse.net.uk...
> > When I go to the city view, I see the squares that the citizens of the
> city
> > are (or could be) working. Does that mean that all that space between
my
> > cities that does NOT show up when I go to a city view is wasted? Is
> > irrigation and mining pointless on those spaces?
> > Thanks.
> >
>
> yes
And, if you have several wasted squares, consider building a new city to
allow those squares to be worked.
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:55:40 -0400 Wayne1127 <wayne1127@nospam.aol.com>
wrote in message
<efe29bb7211091f2ebf143ec0ef63b7e@localhost.talkaboutgaming.com>...
> When I go to the city view, I see the squares that the citizens of the
> city are (or could be) working. Does that mean that all that space
> between my cities that does NOT show up when I go to a city view is
> wasted? Is irrigation and mining pointless on those spaces?
Mining is pointless, unless you expect at some point to build a city nearby.
It might be necessary to irrigate a chain of squares to bring water within
reach of your cities.
Enemy civs can't use roads within your borders, so you get an enormous
tactical advantage over invaders if you build a dense road network.
> Thanks.
--
Daran
The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that
English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don't just borrow words;
on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them
unconscious and riffle their pockets for new vocabulary. -- James D. Nicoll
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.