when to abandon city?

Archived from groups: alt.games.civ3 (More info?)

On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:07:57 +0100, "William Crighton"
<hexic@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:

>i tend to use the method where you build loads of cities very quickly, and
>use a few of them as 'feeder' cities, ie just producing workers until
>republic. i read on another post that 16 cities is the optimum for efficient
>democracy rule. do the benefits of abandoning cities so late on in the game
>still apply? is it worth losing the built up culture for the sake of more
>potential territory?
>

You don't lose any culture points you've received, no matter what
happens to the cities. But you won't generate any more from those
cities, and older cities have higher culture outputs from buildings
than new ones.

I'd say that abandoning the cities is rarely useful, aside from
early in the industrial age, when hospitals suddenly allow for full
use of all squares in those areas. Chuck a few junk cities then,
replacing them elsewhere if needed. I'd never remove any city which
is self-sustaining and productive with a population of 12+, but if you
have some tiny cities which can't make it above size 6, they are good
candidates for destruction.

The optimum pattern is for those cities closest to your palace.
Cities far away don't hurt overall productivity much. It is tiny
cities deep in your core that chew up a slot in the "optimum" city
group which impede your productivity. Distant cities may not produce
much other than culture (and land area controlled), but they don't
hurt you otherwise -- other than in maintenance, and you can sell off
improvements which aren't effective.

The optimum number of cities is dependent on the map size, and the
Forbidden Palace, Courthouse, and Police Station all effectively
increase it.
--
*-__Jeffery Jones__________| *Starfire* |____________________-*
** Muskego WI Access Channel 14/25 <http://www.execpc.com/~jeffsj/mach7/>
*Starfire Design Studio* <http://www.starfiredesign.com/>

Archived from groups: alt.games.civ3 (More info?)

How do you abandon a city? I've never been able to figure that out.
When you capture them, you can raze them. But is there another way?

Thanks

William Crighton wrote:

> i tend to use the method where you build loads of cities very quickly, and
> use a few of them as 'feeder' cities, ie just producing workers until
> republic. i read on another post that 16 cities is the optimum for efficient
> democracy rule. do the benefits of abandoning cities so late on in the game
> still apply? is it worth losing the built up culture for the sake of more
> potential territory?
>
>

Archived from groups: alt.games.civ3 (More info?)

On 19 Jul 2005 15:29:00 GMT, Dave Hinz <DaveHinz@spamcop.net> wrote:

>On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 04:57:36 -0600, Rich Olver <richolver@comcast.net> wrote:
>> How do you abandon a city? I've never been able to figure that out.
>> When you capture them, you can raze them. But is there another way?
>
>right-click on the city when in the overall map view (well, right-click
>on the Mac, not sure about PC). Gives you a bunch of quick options,
>like abandon city, or hurry current production, and so on.

right click works on the pc too.

Buck
--
For what it's worth.