Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows XP > Windows XP General Discussion > Admin Privs still required for WM5.1 & XPSP2 UPnP dynamic ..

Admin Privs still required for WM5.1 & XPSP2 UPnP dynamic ..

Forum Windows XP : Windows XP General Discussion - Admin Privs still required for WM5.1 & XPSP2 UPnP dynamic ..

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.messenger (More info?)

 

I have read in the past that administrator priveleges are required for
Windows Messenger to do its UPnP thing and deal with dynamic port
assignments. Is that still true with SP2/WM5.1?

The reason I ask is that if I use the "Internet Connection" applet that
seems to give me UPnP status, it shows ports being mapped even though I
am logged in as a limited user (ie, not full administrator privs).

Is this still true? For WM5.1/XPSP2 to function properly, do I need to
be logged in as a user with administrative priveleges?

I have gotten a few "Im not sure, but I think so" answers (I do indeed
thank those who replied to me), but I am hoping for some kind of
"definitive" answer, and if possible, from Jonathan Kay.
Thanks in advance,

Joe

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows XP > Windows XP General Discussion > Admin Privs still required for WM5.1 & XPSP2 UPnP dynamic ..
Go to:

There are 988 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them