Microsoft Patents DRM'ed P2P, Torrent Method

Status
Not open for further replies.

dxwarlock

Distinguished
Sep 20, 2008
190
0
18,690
Now not only are games plagued by sometimes unplayable, buggy, only keeps the honest types honest DRM hype. Which makes the cracked versions of most games the MORE stable alternative..
Now P2P will have it too!
As we all know everyone loves MS, now combine it with DRM...I see a winner here (sarcasm)
 

Regulas

Distinguished
May 11, 2008
1,202
0
19,280
Hey, that fit nicely with their DRM infected Swiss Cheese OS Windows 7. Their fanboys will love it, Now flame me fan boys on how great MS is.
 

littlec

Distinguished
Oct 28, 2009
163
0
18,680
I'm not looking forward to it but maybe just maybe this will give people in favor of P2P a legitimate argument.
 
G

Guest

Guest
So basically, the only reason that people would use this is because the other P2P clients are no longer available. Is Windows 8 going to be the ultimate police state enforcer, and shove this down everybody's throats, while preventing other P2P apps from running?

If you value your online privacy and freedom, you may want to check out Linux...
 

alextheblue

Distinguished
[citation][nom]OS_of_fr33d0m[/nom]So basically, the only reason that people would use this is because the other P2P clients are no longer available. Is Windows 8 going to be the ultimate police state enforcer, and shove this down everybody's throats, while preventing other P2P apps from running?If you value your online privacy and freedom, you may want to check out Linux...[/citation]I can still run anything I want on Windows, including open source software like Firefox, Dev C++, and Open Office. They aren't policing anything, and this invention is just a combination of a type of torrent-esque P2P and conventional pay-to-download media.

No conspiracy, just a different method of distributing media - the DRM just makes it so that you can only watch/listen/play if you paid for it. Unless you crack it and pirate it, which once again, is nothing new. We've been using DRM in one form or another for many years. Most DRM doesn't even get in the way or cause any trouble - its the few bad ones (Sony rootkits, etc) that make people really cringe.[citation][nom]Regulas[/nom]Hey, that fit nicely with their DRM infected Swiss Cheese OS Windows 7. Their fanboys will love it, Now flame me fan boys on how great MS is.[/citation]Ah, I see you're running the new Trollware 49.3, how's that working out for you?
 

7amood

Distinguished
Dec 11, 2005
288
0
18,790
I hope msft fails to the deepest darkest hell pit with their stupid drm.
is it necessary that they make use of all possible ways to put their brand on everything usable by consumers and make more money??

I'm happy with windows 7... that's decent business.
I hate DRM... I HATE WINDOWS LIVE AND I HOPE THEIR NEW DRM FAILS SO BAD THAT THEY NEVER THINK OF INVESTING INTO ANYTHING EXCEPT THEIR OS!!!!!1!1

how much does patenting cost?? :s
 
So what happens if I want to watch my movies on the road? Whoops, can't authenticate, can't play it. But I bought it? Yeah. This is no solution. It'll just get hacked up anyway.
 

joshthor

Distinguished
Oct 12, 2008
53
0
18,630
[citation][nom]OS_of_fr33d0m[/nom]So basically, the only reason that people would use this is because the other P2P clients are no longer available. Is Windows 8 going to be the ultimate police state enforcer, and shove this down everybody's throats, while preventing other P2P apps from running?If you value your online privacy and freedom, you may want to check out Linux...[/citation]

paranoid freak. i mean.... nope, i got no other word.
 

fflam

Distinguished
Apr 23, 2009
45
0
18,530
i would assume there drm would work like the zune pass drm (witch is the only drm i have found that i am willing to accept) you download the file, it authenticates for a month (or how ever long it is set for zune pass is a month) and you can use it freely until that month is over then you have to re authenticate to reactivate it.

 

ossie

Distinguished
Aug 21, 2008
335
0
18,780
[citation][nom]AlexTheBlue[/nom]I can still run anything I want on Windows, including open source software like Firefox, Dev C++, and Open Office. [/citation]
"Trusted" computing sounds familiar? Just wait a bit more, to get
mandatory access control, copy protection, and digital rights management goodies enforced upon.
[citation][nom]AlexTheBlue[/nom]Most DRM doesn't even get in the way or cause any trouble[/citation]
Really? Just about 10-15% performance penalties, due to overhead... in the current v6.x gamer/drm o$.

Wintarded micro$uxx fankiddies will "love" this one too, like the gamer/drm o$, when it's shoved down their throats by m$ & co.
 

climber

Distinguished
Feb 26, 2009
325
0
18,780
Why is anyone surprised about Microsoft trying a DRM protected online distribution model, after all they are trying to work towards distributing all their software online, as an interface to the back-end cloud computing end... all we will end up with is keyboards, touchpads/mice and monitors. All our information will be stored on servers out there somewhere... Privacy is dead because there's more money for corporations being able to sell and resell every aspect of our lives to any company or government they can get money out of. Ever wonder why you get so much ads in the mailbox, or in your inbox? We're all profiled, and this is just another step along the road.
 

alextheblue

Distinguished
[citation][nom]ossie[/nom]"Trusted" computing sounds familiar? Just wait a bit more, to get mandatory access control, copy protection, and digital rights management goodies enforced upon.[/citation]Rwear, rokay.[citation][nom]ossie[/nom]Really? Just about 10-15% performance penalties, due to overhead... in the current v6.x gamer/drm o$.Wintarded micro$uxx fankiddies will "love" this one too, like the gamer/drm o$, when it's shoved down their throats by m$ & co.[/citation]Oh yes, because 100% identical H.264 streams in an MP4 container suffer a 10-15% performance hit when they're protected? Proof?
 
G

Guest

Guest
AlexTehBlue: You fall somewhere between naive and stupid. When given the choice of DRM and non-DRM, what do people choose? Non-DRM, of course, because DRM sucks for many, many reasons, even if you're not pirating.

There will always be wav format, and audio out/in jacks, and open-source players, so it'd be naive to think that we can magically make all audio past and presented into some DRMed form, and furthermore, you could directly record the output of a DRMed file into a non-DRM format. This is incredibly intrusive, considering it's a battle they can't possibly win.

Ipods demand your address and credit card before you can sync them to iTunes, which is why I will never own one. If Microsoft goes to uber-intrusive DRM like Apple already has, then guess what? Your choices as a free, non-sheep person are: GNU/Linux/*BSD.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Long live Ubuntu and all open source operating systems.....Now only if we can have games natively produced for Linux....mhm?
 

Regulas

Distinguished
May 11, 2008
1,202
0
19,280
[citation][nom]AlexTheBlue[/nom]I can still run anything I want on Windows, including open source software like Firefox, Dev C++, and Open Office. They aren't policing anything, and this invention is just a combination of a type of torrent-esque P2P and conventional pay-to-download media. No conspiracy, just a different method of distributing media - the DRM just makes it so that you can only watch/listen/play if you paid for it. Unless you crack it and pirate it, which once again, is nothing new. We've been using DRM in one form or another for many years. Most DRM doesn't even get in the way or cause any trouble - its the few bad ones (Sony rootkits, etc) that make people really cringe.Ah, I see you're running the new Trollware 49.3, how's that working out for you?[/citation]
If Linux is trollware then so be it MS fanboy
 

ravewulf

Distinguished
Oct 20, 2008
973
33
19,010
[citation][nom]Regulas[/nom]If Linux is trollware then so be it MS fanboy[/citation]

Software is neutral in this respect, it's the people behind the screen that can be idiots (on both/all sides of this and other arguments).

Can we please keep this on topic instead of making wild claims with no basis in fact and going on tangents?
 

razor512

Distinguished
Jun 16, 2007
2,134
71
19,890
Encrypted content means more CPU cycles needed to decrypt it in order to play it, this prevents older systems from viewing content and reduces performance in newer systems if a user wants to multitask

by the nature of this technology, there will be a bandwidth overhead as it takes more data to create and maintain an encrypted stream of traffic.

the legit user gains nothing from this, they only loose bandwidth and system performance, and through the nature of permission based DRM, is it requires an internet connection in order to confirm that you are not stealing and if you don't have internet or the company that does the DRM or owns the DRM servers, dies, then your content is gone also

imagine spending hundreds of dollars on content and suddenly loose it because the company that owned the DRM servers goes out of business.

companies need to learn that DRM does not stop piracy it increases it because think about this

if there were 2 people offering you the same content; Person A if offering a video with DRM in which you get the content, it only works on their software and their portable devices and the content has to be validated on their servers so if they ever go out of business, the content you paid for is useless.

Person B is offering the same content which will come with no DRM and will be available in any format you want so it can work with any device.

who would you go with?

what these companies need to do is put no DRM of any media or games and instead offer an experience that cant be pirated. Piracy is not convenient, it requires a user to spend time looking for the content, downloading it and scanning it for infections with multiple scanners, and hoping it is the correct content that they spend all day getting
avoiding DRM makes this worth it for them,

the media companies need to make a service that is very convenient and easier to use than the pirate route, they need to make the content available in all popular formats and make it so that a propitiatory program is not needed to gain access to the content.

look at movies, there available for download and also sold on almost every street corner here in NY days before the movie is out in theaters
on the way to the movies, you will pass by at least 10 people selling the movie on dvd. but theres one thing that cant be pirated, the experience, and quality and guaranteed safety of the content, + you can bring in your favorite meal with you to the movies if you put other stuff on top of the food and put it in a bag

when a few hundred million people go o see a movie, can the media companies really think that they don't know about pirating the content, they do, they just rather go to the movies to see it
 

KC8DKT

Distinguished
Sep 5, 2009
31
0
18,530
[citation][nom]AlexTheBlue[/nom]Rwear, rokay.
Oh yes, because 100% identical H.264 streams in an MP4 container suffer a 10-15% performance hit when they're protected? Proof?[/citation]


take ANY DVD/BRay
put it in your PC drive
use "DVD Decrypter" to copy to your HDD
burn the files back to a DVD/BRay

Play the store disk log cpu/ram
Play the copy and log cpu/ram

Logs = your Proof
An a desktop DVD/BRay has a much higher "performance hit" then your PC.
 

Khimera2000

Distinguished
Jul 16, 2009
324
0
18,780
looks interesting, but i don't see it as an effective medium for music just for the simple fact that there are DRM free options out there... now if they can do software i might be interested, beats going to the store only to find your games sold out... and saves on gas :D but then again this scheme does not look like it supports software... unless I'm missing something. its also worth noting that there is no text for reactivation of content does that mean that the activation would be a one time deal? who knows... i cant really judge anything unless there's an actual product out, ill reserve the right to bash M$ till then.
 

razor512

Distinguished
Jun 16, 2007
2,134
71
19,890
[citation][nom]kc8dkt[/nom]take ANY DVD/BRayput it in your PC driveuse "DVD Decrypter" to copy to your HDDburn the files back to a DVD/BRayPlay the store disk log cpu/ramPlay the copy and log cpu/ramLogs = your ProofAn a desktop DVD/BRay has a much higher "performance hit" then your PC.[/citation]


yep, a bluray video will usually use like 80-90% CPU usage on a mid range system while the same video, same bitrate and similar file size (DRM removed) will have a 10-20% CPU usage
DRM only hurts the legit customer, a user getting DRM free bluray content can still use their ancient amd 64 4000+ and geforce 6 home theater PC to watch their favorite 1080P content as the same quality and bit rate by pirating it while a legit customer will need a high end dual or quad core system with the latest video hardware that supports HDCP and also accelerates some of the decrypting of the DRM crap just to watch it, a DRM free video is more cost effective hardware wise for the users (also since theres no HDCP crap with drm free content, you can use your VGA connection or hdmi on your older non HDCP tv and still enjoy 1080P
 
G

Guest

Guest
DRM & Torrent?
Bwahahaha!
I wonder how long that'll live before being cracked!
Lolz!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.