Archived from groups: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell (More info?)
This is a slight enigma to me, as I have *all* power saving options
switched OFF except for powering down the monitor after an hour, and
there`s a standard opengl screensaver running after about 40 minutes.
The machine can take 20-30 seconds to bring back a normal looking
desktop upon resuming / wiggling the mouse once the screensaver /
monitor powered down has kicked in - this also affects use of the
machine for that period with it being even more sluggish than usual.
It only has the stock 256Mb of RAM, but it seems a little anti-intuitive
that it should take so long to "come back" and refresh the desktop
(often having to redraw the icons from "blank" ).
Any suggestions ? (apart from maybe just changing the screensaver to
"blank screen" )
--
Please add the word "newsgroup" in the subject line of personal emails
**** My email address includes "ngspamtrap" and "@btinternet.com" ****
Archived from groups: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell (More info?)
Colin Wilson <void@btinternet.com> writes:
>It only has the stock 256Mb of RAM, but it seems a little anti-intuitive
>that it should take so long to "come back" and refresh the desktop
>(often having to redraw the icons from "blank" ).
>Any suggestions ? (apart from maybe just changing the screensaver to
>"blank screen" )
The on board graphics uses main system ram. The screensaver is probably
using up a lot of ram and windows is paging out other things.
I'd definetly use a lower resolution screen saver but you should also look
into some more ram.
Archived from groups: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell (More info?)
"Mark Hittinger" <bugs@pu.net> wrote in message
news:sJqdnXHlovzB-YPeRVn-gg@comcast.com...
> Colin Wilson <void@btinternet.com> writes:
>>It only has the stock 256Mb of RAM, but it seems a little anti-intuitive
>>that it should take so long to "come back" and refresh the desktop
>>(often having to redraw the icons from "blank" ).
>>Any suggestions ? (apart from maybe just changing the screensaver to
>>"blank screen" )
>
> The on board graphics uses main system ram. The screensaver is probably
> using up a lot of ram and windows is paging out other things.
>
> I'd definetly use a lower resolution screen saver but you should also look
> into some more ram.
>
> Later
>
> Mark Hittinger
> bugs@pu.net
Could also be that the monitor itself is slowly going bad. Many CRTs will
typically do that over a period of time, waking more slowly with age.
Archived from groups: alt.sys.pc-clone.dell (More info?)
"Colin Wilson" <void@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1d894a22a0c8bc9f98b3e6@news.individual.net...
>> Could also be that the monitor itself is slowly going bad. Many CRTs
>> will
>> typically do that over a period of time, waking more slowly with age.
>
> The monitor itself is OK - it was the PC itself taking time to
> "recover" from the screensaver that had me confused.
>
> Thanks for the reply :-)
>
> --
Could have to do with the fact that the onboard video has some limitations.
For example, my 2400 will NOT work with my Home Theater software.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.