I'd like to check which are the top 5 most graphically intensive games out in the market right now? The reason I'm asking is that I'm building a gaming system and I want to stress test it to the max.
Well, in order, I'd rank them roughly like this:[list=1:4c5ca5ca1a][*:4c5ca5ca1a]The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion - Make no mistake, this is the game to blow all the others away. The only game out there that, so far, had to actually be watered down from its true maximum to work on the Xbox 360.
[*:4c5ca5ca1a]F.E.A.R.: First Encounter Assault Recon - 2005's original hardware killer. Can bring most machines to a halt, particularly with that creative, yet lousy, attempt at "soft shadows." First real game to place a massive shader load compared to the texture load.
[*:4c5ca5ca1a]Call of Duty 2 - Game looks amazing, and also incredibly intensive. Unlike F.E.A.R. and Oblivion, has more of a texture load, like older games.
[*:4c5ca5ca1a]Quake IV - Clearly, another intensive game. VERY texture-heavy.
[*:4c5ca5ca1a]Tom Clancey's Splinter Cell 3: Chaos Theory - Much weaker than the others, yes, but one of THREE games out there that use parallax mapping by default, the other two being F.E.A.R. and Oblivion. Loads of shaders at work here, to throw against any graphics card. (I'm considering a few other games that may actually deserve this spot instead, so I'm not 100% certain on #5 here)I INTENTIONALLY left off Battlefield 2. Why? It's not graphics-intensive. It's simply crappily coded. I mean, for all the brouhaha, take a look: one quickly can notice lots of graphical parallels with The Elder Scrolls III: Morrowind. It's laughable. Sure, it adds on SOME shaders, and has SpeedTree, but it's hardly innovative in graphics, or even intensive; Half-Life2 easily beats it there, and that's a game famous for being easy on the graphics card! So for gameplay, it may rock, (it IS fun, presuming you're not the target of your team's own artillery strike) but it gets poor marks for graphical technology.
Stress is one thing, but if you want to check your system out for EYE CANDY, then here is my slate:
Half Life 2 - This game was the original reason I bought a new system. Crank it up, see what your system will do with it. Plus, who can resist fragging someone online with the gravity gun?
Far Cry - Not the newest game under the sun, but man oh man what a nice one. Lighting and distance are the major cool factors here. Get up to a good vantage point and look at the world around you: if your video card had a proverbial jaw, it would hit the proverbial floor.
FEAR - Creepy, very friggin' creepy. Get a high end system, and you'll crap your pants when those lights start to flicker in the game... well, at least I did. The ambiant visual effects should be some nice eye candy to slice thru.
Serious Sam 2 - Fun factor is high, and if your screen res is too, then this would make for some serious eye candy.
Elder Scrolls IV - This is the reason I have an ATI X1900XTX showing up at my doorstep tomorrow. My GOD this game will push a system. Good for both eye candy AND stress test.
Half Life 2 isnt graphic intensive it was built to be playable on a geforce 4. i had that game on medium-high settings at 1024*768 on a 5200fx and it ran fine... its an excellent game but its not graphic intensive...lol
I got it running on an MX440 w/64mb memory at Ultra High, 16AF, 8xAA and I get at least 90FPS. And my 128mb of RAM easily handles the level loads in under 10 seconds.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.