Archived from groups: alt.cellular.verizon (
More info?)
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 02:21:32 GMT, "rbh martin"
<rbhmartin@hotmail.spam.comcom> wrote:
>yup, 60 % of my takes me through roanoke, down into TN and on to nashville.
>i hity bad spots down below roanoke. i also go across WV on 64 an sometimnes
>down 79 down through to charleston. lots of bad spots there.
I didn't have much luck with service on I-64. I got spotty service
that was pure digital near places like Clifton Forge and Lexington,
but weak analog elsewhere. Again, this was over a year ago. WV
service is pretty bad outside the "metro areas" (Charleston,
Beckley/Bluefield/Princeton). Charleston is Alltel,
Beckley/Bluefield/Princeton is U.S. Cellular. Where the service is
there, it's good, but the state's terrain and low population outside
cities conspires to make service outside those areas pretty weak.
Even service along 77 between the aforementioned Alltel and U.S.
Cellular "main" areas is pretty weak on a tri-mode phone, due to those
factors.
The "bad spots down below Roanoke" is presumably in the Alltel service
area from just past Pulaski to just before the Tri-Cities area (around
Abingdon is where VZW's Tri-Cities service kicks in). I used to get
digital service in much of this area, but not all of it.
>is it vastly improved in these ares to have analog capabilities in these
>areas or is there just no cell service to speak of?
Analog signals on tri-mode phones are usually weak, unless you're
fairly near towers. I think Alltel, especially, has analog signals
intended for use by 3W bag phones (Larry, put DOWN that keyboard
.
I'm not sure how much of an improvement you'd get with a tri-mode
phone, but my *general* thought is that it's better to have a weak
signal you might be able to latch onto, than no signal at all. And my
LG 4400 can be kicked into "digital only" via a programming menu, if
I'm concerned that it's try to grab a weak analog signal over a
digital signal.
Mike