Ok, Germany is like a state in the US, so your financial and economic issues is on a different scale than the US as a whole. If you want to make comparisons, use most of Europe.
So here is some stuff from just my home state of Massachusetts in the US.
Dude, you can STFU, what's wrong with doing something better for energy technology? Right now there isnt something that can replace oil in its supply size, but why dont the US government do something about it? German government did. They finance a huge project to build wind-powered tubin on their land, and trust me, it's very efficient if they build it in massive numbers.
City of Hull in Massachusetts already has 3 operational wind-powered turbines, with one thats about 1/3 the size of your mega turbine your building in germany. Hull has had several of these turbines for years. There is a wind-powered turbine just south of boston, and there are plans to build a farm of them off the east coast of Massachusetts.
All Americans do is condeming gas efficient technology like Hybrid says it's gay to drive a car like Yaris. I bet you if it's not because gas price is up the roof, not a single American would buy a Hybrid car because it's not fast enough.
Every major car manufactuer is currently selling 1-2 models of hybrid cars in the US. Most poeple that I know think they are cool and want them, just wish they were cheeper. The US government gives a tax break to make them affordable and it generally makes up the difference between the same model of the car that is not a hybrid.
And not only German and other European countries are doing it, Japan is doing it as well. Their public transportation is top notch, the Shinkansen is something the US can dream about. Living here in Boston and riding those lame ass T train make me sick, slow and noisy. Being proud of your country is nothing wrong, but dont take it too radically, for we have a lot to learn from other countries.
The commuter system and rails in Boston were constructed 40-50 years if not longer before the Shinkansen was built. It is a lot easier to build a better rail system from the ground up with new technology than upgrading an existing line. A number of the rails running out of boston would have to be completely replaced to build high speed trains like those in Japan, you cant just toss a bullet train on any set of rails, or run it through highly settled areas. Most commutor lines in Mass cross major streets and run right through the center of towns. Secondly, Japan as a country which built the rail system, those in Boston were built by a single state in the US, not by our country but by Massachusetts which has a lot less $$$$ than the country of Japan.
US spent $500 billion a year for the army, but NYC right now is still in process to build a public Wi Fi network (Taipei finished it). Keeping peace in the world? Oh please, gimme a break. Protecting your country is fine, but do not bring democratic ideology and make everyone to follow it. 30 years ago it doesnt work in Vietnam, and it will not work now.
1) The US spends 350-400 billion every year on its military, even before the war in iraq. Shrug, so what. Thats the federal goverments job. Build a military, and keep it up to date. Its not the governments place to provide public Wi Fi, that is for companies to do as a service. If the government puts in a public Wi Fi they are breaking free trade and effectively creating a situation where it pushes competion out of that market. Who is going to pay for Verizon if they get free Wi Fi. If governments could do it better than private enterprise, we can just look at the Big Dig in Boston as an example that this is not true.
2) So what if Taipei already has Wi Fi. Someone is always going to do it first. It doesnt always have to be a city in the US to do it. Maybe I dont want my taxes paying for Wi Fi in Boston where I am not going to use it since I live 30 min out of Boston.
3) Im not even goingt to comment on Vietnam, mostly because I thought that war was pretty stupid, but then again I only see it from the perspective of history.