USB addressing

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : USB addressing
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

I'm not quite sure which would be the best forum to post the USB question, but I'll try here.

I've got Windows XP Home on a P4 2.2 system and have been having nightmares with my printers. I'm using a HP870Cse and an Okidata ML184 dox matrix. I also have a Brother MFC8500 all in one machine on the system via USB. I know it may sound nuts, but all three of these printers are used many times each day.

I found somewhere on the MS site a statement that Windows 2000 does not use the Windows 95/98 method of addressing the parallel ports, and as such there can be problems printing through those ports. My experience with XP Home is that 100% of my processor capacity is taken up while printing through my parallel ports (2 on the computer). I'm guessing that the same issue of port access that exists in 2000 has been put in XP Home. I can do virtually nothing else on the computer until the printing is completed.

I've resolved this issue by purchasing parallel to USB adaptor cables. When printing via the USB port I have nearly no cpu capacity being used after the first moment of two of printing, and I can proceed to my next task on the computer while it is printing.

HOWEVER, it seems that the USB addresses change at random when I boot up my computer. I have numerous Excel macros that automatically print (invoices, quote forms etc.) for me. The various USB ports show up in those macros as Ne03, Ne04, Ne07 etc. I'm not sure where in XP to find what those assignments are so I just auto-create a macro that prints and then edit the macro to see what the Ne## assignment is. My problem is that XP is randomly changing those assignments (at boot up I assume). As such my macros fail and I have to figure out what the Ne## assignment is again and again.

Anyone know enought about USB port addressing to enlighten me on this issue?????

Thanks,
BH Davis

Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

did you set the bios "Reset Configuration Data" option?


Go to:
Add a reply
 

Google Ads
Ad
News

Intel to bring 64-bit to P4, Celerons in Q2

Published on January 26, 2005

Intel plans to upgrade its current LGA-775 Pentium 4 line-up with its AMD64-like EM64T 64-bit addressing technology next quarter, the company's latest roadmap update reveals. Read more

New Firefox kills bugs

Published on February 03, 2006

The first new Mozilla Firefox point release of the year is now out addressing a number of bug and security issues. Overall, Danish security firm Secunia rates the aggregate of all the security issues "highly critical." Read more

AMD Releases Catalyst 8.1 Driver

Published on January 18, 2008

AMD has Read more

Intel ships 64-bit, 2 MB L2 Pentium 4s

Published on March 21, 2005

Intel yesterday formally began selling its Pentium 4 6xx series, rolling out four versions of the 90nm, 2 MB L2 cache chip. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Shuttle's X27: Can Atom Handle Vista?

Published on October 08, 2008

In the horsepower race between Intel’s and AMD’s quad-core chips, the Atom processor is an everyday hybrid. Shuttle took it and created a pint-sized small for factor box. Is it powerful enough to be your daily-use desktop, though? Read more

Do New Drivers Really Boost Performance?

Published on October 07, 2008

How much extra performance can you get from a simple graphics driver update? And what sort of gaming gains can you expect from a high-end graphics card when you overclock your CPU? Read more

Best Video Cards For The Money: Oct '08

Published on October 06, 2008

Detailed graphics card specifications and reviews are great—that is, if you have the time to do the research. At the end of the day, what a gamer needs is the best graphics card within a certain budget, and that’s what we’re going to show you. Read more

Atom, Athlon, or Nano? Energy-Savers Compared

Published on October 03, 2008

We compared Intel’s Atom 230 and VIA’s Nano L2100 processors hoping to find the best product for low-power applications. VIA is in the vanguard of performance. Is this enough to beat Atom? Read more