Quantum Teleportation

sorry i dunno antying about telportation.

i do know how a Standard Starfleet transporter system functions though.

<font color=red><b>Don't take life too seriously.... You won't get out of it alive.</font color=red></b>

Yes, I know this is far out but maybe in a couple of decades we'll all have quantum teleporters in our cell phones and computers.

AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the <b>ULTIMATE</b> PC processor

the first time I heard about Quantum Teleportation was 1997
here is the latest:
<A HREF="http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99991888" target="_new">http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99991888</A>

some older
<A HREF="http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99991346" target="_new">http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99991346</A>

<A HREF="http://www.nature.com/nsu/010927/010927-11.html" target="_new">http://www.nature.com/nsu/010927/010927-11.html</A>
(use their advancded search and look for teleportation)

related:
<A HREF="http://www.idquantique.com" target="_new">http://www.idquantique.com</A> showed quantum cryptography at CeBIT <A HREF="http://www.quantum.univie.ac.at/research/crypto/" target="_new">http://www.quantum.univie.ac.at/research/crypto/</A>

Fredi
Tom's Hardware Guide

I love quantum teleportation.


Fredi is into physics right the [-peep-] on!

"The Cash Left In My Pocket,The BEST Benchmark"

star trek is great; but it's so fake.

<font color=red><b>Don't take life too seriously.... You won't get out of it alive.</font color=red></b>

No way!
Dr Who is real.

<font color=red><i>Doctor Hooter</i></font color=red> <A HREF="http://www.page3.com/" target="_new"><b>(·Y·)</b></A>

we will be SO MORE advanced than that, except for the propulsion.

<font color=red><b>Don't take life too seriously.... You won't get out of it alive.</font color=red></b>

but i mean in star trek they control everything with buttons, gimme a break, in 400 years we'll just think what we want to happen and it will

<font color=red><b>Don't take life too seriously.... You won't get out of it alive.</font color=red></b>

yeah lets just warp space. good idea

<font color=red><b>Don't take life too seriously.... You won't get out of it alive.</font color=red></b>

Of course this isn't going to happen in the real world any time soon but with theories, you're allowed to think far out, as long as you have some research to back it up.

AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the <b>ULTIMATE</b> PC processor

<A HREF="http://www.lerc.nasa.gov/WWW/PAO/html/warp/ipspaper.htm" target="_new">Here</A> is some interesting information on folding space and warp drive from NASA.

AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the <b>ULTIMATE</b> PC processor

Where'nt you told not to talk about that shiit...<pre>you know why too</pre><p>by Kyoto! Hello high waters! <A HREF="http://www.page3.com/wallpaper2/img/081101_s_katie.jpg" target="_new">Katie</A>

teleportation...telekenesis
sounds similar no?

My cousin in a graduate from MIU, and has practised, intensively, for the past 25 years, Transcendental Meditation. Ok! some of you know what i'm getting already, right! Well he in fact is able to levitate. No I have not seen this myself.
There is something to be said about mind over matter. Mind-Matter-Energy could be some relashionships among these that still elude our scientists.

by Kyoto! Hello high waters! <A HREF="http://www.page3.com/wallpaper2/img/081101_s_katie.jpg" target="_new">Katie</A>

Are you close to what?
You have to "Think out of the box".


<font color=blue><b>You get what you pay for...all advice here is free.</b></font color=blue>

There is the old technology of ludicrous speed.
Time tested!

<font color=red><i>Doctor Hooter</i></font color=red> <A HREF="http://www.page3.com/" target="_new"><b>(·Y·)</b></A>

First of all, I suppose teleportation might be possible one day, but right now we don't even understand the geometry of space. If you consider small distances euclidean geometry stands true and simple laws like the inverse square law of light work. However, if you consider cosmological distances it fails ever so slightly. The geometry seems to be that of a sphere or something of that nature so if you look at something close you might see an angle of parallax and as it moves away that angle of parallax will get smaller (as pera any 101 astro class). However if you move even farther away you can prove that the angle will start to get larger again. Grab a globe and try this yourself. If you pick the north pole as earch and pick something between the equator and yourself you get one angle. Draw a line on the globe or put a peice of tape on it. Then observe the angle as you get farther away. The angle gets smaller until you reach the equator. Once you go past the equator and into the southern hemisphere the angle will start to increase again.

<font color=red>If you were to have sex with your clone would that be considered incest or masturbation?</font color=red>

Interesting, but I doubt we will ever truly know the shape of the universe. The problem is that we're not getting the whole picture. The farther we look, the more distorted our picture of the universe gets. Remember we're not seeing the universe as it is today, but we are seeing the past. When the hubble space telescope looks at an image of a distant galaxy, it's millions of light years away. What that means is that we're looking at that galaxy as it was millions of years ago. That might easily explain why we're not finding any planets similar to earth. It's because we're looking into the past before such plants existed. Until we can find a way to image Space faster than the speed of light, we will never truly know how the universe looks until we can actually develop propulsion to get us there. Even in Star Trek, they don't have the means to travel millions of light years. In fact, in Star Trek: Voyager, Voyager was stuck in the Delta Quadrant, 70 000 light years from earth, and even with warp drive, it would take them a life time to get home. Of course, I doubt we truly know the limitations of a theoretical warp drive.

AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the <b>ULTIMATE</b> PC processor

Yes, and just our galaxy is bigger than that (100,000 ly). In Star Trek they apparently haven't even left the galaxy.

The human mind can't even comprehend the depth of our galaxy let alone the universe so it's very hard to try to develop and understand these ideas.

<font color=red>If you were to have sex with your clone would that be considered incest or masturbation?</font color=red>

Really? We did a big thing on it... It's a huge factor in nuclear fusion.

If my baby don't love me, I know, I know, her sister will.

That's very true. It has to do with what we can see and detect. If you want to look back 9 billion years there surely exist planets, but they are long gone now. The same will be true for us one day.

<font color=red>If you were to have sex with your clone would that be considered incest or masturbation?</font color=red>

Notice how the thread sorta died once we got here?

If my baby don't love me, I know, I know, her sister will.

Maybe if we jazzed up the physics a bit...

I think if someone could come up with a quantum manifold pre-processor to compensate for the heisenberg uncertainty doohicky, then run the output through the inverse duotronic transducers...

*wipes the dirt off now*

If my baby don't love me, I know, I know, her sister will.

Yeah, I heard that... Way cool. I'm still waiting for NGST though...

If my baby don't love me, I know, I know, her sister will.

Neat. Kinda makes ya wonder what Hubble would have been like had they not installed that buggered up mirror in the first place...

If my baby don't love me, I know, I know, her sister will.

NGST will blow Hubble away anyways... Super cool.

If my baby don't love me, I know, I know, her sister will.