Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers (
More info?)
From: David Candy (david@mvps.org)
Subject: Re: Launching newsreader using message-ID in "Run"
View: Complete Thread (17 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: news.software.readers,
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Date: 2004-05-01 03:02:43 PST
Not everybody with an MVPS.ORG address is an MVP. The
requirements for an MVP address is that one has to be, or had
been in the past a MVP. I was an MVP in 1998 for the Word
Product Development Team. I then won a second MVP award
in Desktop systems under a false name (and lost the MVP
under my own name). The MVP program was transfered from
the developers to the marketing dept and I'm not interested in
it anymore.
----- Madeline wrote: -----
It really does not matter if his name is Tandy or Candy, jerk. The issue is
the same. This person has no business being an MVP, if, in fact, he is one.
His source says, From: "David Candy" <david@mvps.org> jerk. LOL. If he is
not an MVP, why does he use the privileged title and get all the goodies?
Madeline
"Tom" <noway@nothere.com> wrote in message
news:OGKgPhzREHA.2468@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>> "Madeline" <anonymous@msnews.mirosoft.com> wrote in message
> news:%238qrObzREHA.2412@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> Re: David Tandy
>> How in the world could a person who is supposed to help people (at
least,
> I
>> thought that is what MVPs are supposed to do) think it is O.K. to tell
>> posters they are stupid and to commit suicide? Mr. Tandy is the one who
>> should be ashamed. And yes, his attitude makes me ashamed to be a human.
>>>> Is there no one who oversees and checks when these so-called MVPs
respond
> in
>> such an outrageous manner to posters? Tandy's response was so uncalled
and
>> in my opinion he has no right to continue as an MVP. His attitude is why
I
>> visit this site only every few months.
>>>> Regards,
>> Madeline
>> LOL, while David can be harsh from time to time, his last name isn't
"Tandy'
> (LOL, did you not read his name?)), nor is he an MVP. But did the OP look
at
> his own question???
>