Thanks for the replies
Don't forget that 1080i is more than vertical resolution. 1080i is 1920x1080, and 720p is 1280x720. That's 2.1M and 920K, respectively. Even if interlaced is 1/2 the vertial resolution, 1920x540 is still 1M, which is a little over 100k sharper than 720p.
According to wiki, interlaced is about 60% as sharp as progressive (I'm still skeptical, but just citing legit sources). So 1920x640 'perceived' resolution would put 1080i at 1,244,160 pixels and 720p at 921,600.
Either way, I'm sure you're still right about 1080p being better than 1080i, but I think until I see it I'll still be skeptical. Thanks for the insight
@nomad440: A lot of my disdain towards the PS3 is probably more personal than technical. I don't see why the PS3 needs to bleed my bank account to give me great games. I think they invested in a risky new technology (that still may flop: the cell processor), and they're using the PS3 to create blu-ray dominance in the HD media market. Rather than creating industry-standards for HD media, they want to dominate the market, and they're using corporate 'brute-force' to do it, at the expense of the consumer. Let's face it: sony had a lot of choices for HD media, but they went with blue-ray. It's overly-expensive to develop and produce. The diodes are expensive, that hardware is expensive, the media is expensive, and it's expensive to WRITE to the media. All of this expense falls upon the consumer, JUST so sony can collect royalties on blu-ray for the next 10 years. Pfft.
I'm also not a big fan of the 'longevity' argument. Technological advancemens are not only progressing, but accelerating. With nano-technology on the horizon for semi-conductors and holographic technology on the horizon with optical media, the PS3 will be obsolete in 5 years. I think it's an investment I'm forced to make, and would rather not because I don't see the PS3 as a long-term solution to my technology needs.
Also note that Sony flipped out when they saw the Wii. The full-motion controller sent Sony into a frenzy, and they quickly developed the SIXAXIS controller. Where the Wii games use this as the foundation of gameplay (Very successfully even), it's just another underutilized feature on the PS3.
One thing I DO like about the PS3 is the 'home super-computer' argument, with support for Linux. I'm a Microsoft man myself, but I use Linux and if I ever get a PS3, I'll be putting linux on it if I ever need the power. I think official support for Linux was a great idea, and we'll see great PS3 mods on Linux in the near future.
The only thing I want to disagree on is the DreamCast statement. DC died because it was hacked BEFORE it was released. This is because it ran on Windows CE. Now before you get into, "F*cking windows. It Figures," windows CE has great developer support, and it's that support that allowed people to poke around in memory. There were experts on the system long before it came out. WinCE also has a lot of the same code-base as windows, so it was REALLY easy to port software already running on windows to the DC (Such as emulators, CRC and ecryption cracking, codecs, etc). This let people download and hack games with ease, which killed sales, and we all know console gaming is ALL about game sales.
Also, developer support for Sony has been dropping as of late, thanks to the PS3. It's all over the internet.
Ultimately, I think hardware was the selling point with consoles last generation. I think we'll see gameplay and online content dominate this generation. From that perspective, PS3 is in dead last versus the Wii and Xbox.