Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers (
More info?)
Just because something doesn't work for you doesn't mean there is a bug.
It's up to ATI to make their drivers work with the OS not the other way
around. (I haven't heard of any particular ATI problem though.)
"Husky" <cbminfo@toast.net> wrote in message
news:fpdih0589suoma5icita7lt12hhpo8ksqc@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 08:59:40 -0700, "Francis"
> <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> The original is buggy enough. I had it installed for maybe half an hour
> before
> it totally screwed up everything ATI.
> This was just last week. You can't tell me they've now released that buggy
> thing as an actual release ?
>
> They haven't fixed the ATI bugs from SP1 yet.
>
>>It's not a good idea to download the SP from a non-
>>microsoft source. I got the network install yesterday and
>>in installed flawlessly on my XP Pro machine. I'm in the
>>process of passing the disk on to my poor buddies on dial-
>>up.
>>
>>Anyhow...see if you can restore your computer and install
>>the proper service pack from MS. If you're really itchen
>>to get it...download the network install, but be sure to
>>pass the disk around to as many people as you can. Do not
>>keep it for yourself.
>>
>>At least you didn't download it off Kazaa! I can't
>>believe there are people who actually did that!
>>
>>Cheers
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>I recently installed Windows XP-KB835935-SP2-ENU.exe from
>>Softpedia for my
>>>home computer which has XP Professional (Released to
>>Manufacturers). Now the
>>>Windows release materials tell me to incrementally load
>>it using my
>>>auto-updates. Is there anything wrong with the way I
>>loaded it?
>>>.
>>>
>
> more pix @
http://members.toast.net/cbminfo/index.html
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram