This game seems like nothing new, I was really excited about it till I got the demo, just goes to show demos aren't always a good thing for games. Also the net code seemed very badly done, as even a server where I was getting a ping of about 40 was juddering all over the place. John Carmack may be a game coding god but as for his net code goes, I think he is best leaving that to those who know best. I mean Battle Field 2 has a better net code and that's saying something as there net code is rank.
I love this game, bf2 was my game but now quake wars is my fav. Great graphics, think of bf2 but with aliens and future weapons, without all the bugs and cheapness of bf2. Guns still kill when your standing up!
For a game coming out in 2007 that has to compete with Crysis Halo 3 etc, I was pretty disapppointed. Like most people said it just seemed like BF 2.5. AS nice as the graphics seem, it just didnt have that "Wow!" factor that makes the game fun. I was thinking about buying it, but after playing the demo, I will save my money for something better(Crysis)