note on 8800gtx cards used
""It goes without saying at this point that Crysis looks amazing. We played on dual-core and quad-core PCs that had a single 8800GTX video card, and the performance was fairly smooth, though there were slight pauses at the beginning of each mission as textures and assets were loaded into the game for the first time. Although we were running machines capable of DirectX 10 graphics, EA and Crytek had us playing the DX 9 version of the game, and it still looked amazing."
Thank goodness
Message edited by sirkillalot on 10-07-2007 at 11:03:37 AM
------------------------------AMD P2955X4 ATI 5870 DX11 24" dell 1900x1200 2x74 wraptor hd's1 X-FI pro gamer sounds
2G ram log.Z5500 speakers 650w toughpower G15kb dvd....ITS A MEAN GREEN GAMING MACHINE
I was thinking that as well. Oh well. I don't need uber-high end graphics, although I'm sure the HD2900 Pro OCed to XT clocks will deliver. only bottleneck I can see in my PC is the CPU and RAM. >.>
------------------------------Intel NWPD Employee. Hawthorn Farm Campus. Navy DEPer, Ship Date: 080122 (YY/MM/DD)
Reply to justinmcg67
I cannot imagine people with midrange system experiencing this game. There's going to be riot, if it's not optmised well. If it runs "fairly" well on a high end 8800gtx, the majority of the people will just have to settle with mediocre graphic settings. The hype of this game is on the graphics.
Many people may not get the experience that the game was intended to deliver.
I cannot imagine people with midrange system experiencing this game. There's going to be riot, if it's not optmised well. If it runs "fairly" well on a high end 8800gtx, the majority of the people will just have to settle with mediocre graphic settings. The hype of this game is on the graphics.
Many people may not get the experience that the game was intended to deliver.
While I agree that many will not get to see the game in all its glory, you are looking at it the wrong way. Hardware always gets better over time and eventually most will see the game in full glory when their hardware catches up. This is a good thing not a bad thing.
In the old days software lagged years behind hardware which really sucked. You would have this fantastic/expensive hardware and no software would really make full use of your fancy machine. Now thanks to things like DirectX, well written software can beat affordable hardware to market. FarCry was a system killer when it first came out. Now I can run FarCry maxed out at full native res running FSAA and all options turned up. Crysis is following in FarCry's footsteps, which is a good thing. It will be playable a lower settings for most of us and as we upgrade the game will look better and better. This makes the game more "future proof".
Message edited by lakedude on 10-10-2007 at 02:51:08 AM
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.