Tom's Hardware > Forum > Games General > PC Gaming > Server 2003 & gaming

Server 2003 & gaming

Forum Games General : PC Gaming - Server 2003 & gaming

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Anyone have experience with gaming much on Server 2003. I want to try it to get use out of my new system with 4G of ram.

Any replies would be appreciated.

------------------------------ Q6600 G0 @3.6 1.34v | GTX280 1GB | 26" Samsung T260| 19" 1907FP | Asus Maximus Formula X38 (Rampage Mod) | Kandalf VD4000 LCS | Ultra X2 750W | Supreme FXII 7.1 | Audio FX Pro 5.1 Headset | 4x1024 Ballistix Tracer 5-5-5-14 1066mhz | LG GGW-H20L
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

I have no experience with Server 2003. However, you can get Windows XP 64-bit or Windows Vista-64bit to get your OS to recognise your 4 gigs of RAM.

I use Vista 64-bit and games run quite well. Given your Videocard, I would go with XP 64-bit.

------------------------------ Windows XP MCE & Vista 64-bit (dual boot)
XFX NFORCE 680I LT SLI w/ OCZ Platinum 4 Gigs Dual DDR2 @ 800MHz
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.4GHz w/ ChillTec Thermo Electric CPU Cooler
MSI NX8800 GTX & X-Fi XtremeGamer Soundblaster
Reply to Alex The PC Gamer

Why would you say to go with XP when I have a DX10 video card ?

------------------------------ Q6600 G0 @3.6 1.34v | GTX280 1GB | 26" Samsung T260| 19" 1907FP | Asus Maximus Formula X38 (Rampage Mod) | Kandalf VD4000 LCS | Ultra X2 750W | Supreme FXII 7.1 | Audio FX Pro 5.1 Headset | 4x1024 Ballistix Tracer 5-5-5-14 1066mhz | LG GGW-H20L
Reply to thecompukid
- 0 +

thecompukid wrote :

Why would you say to go with XP when I have a DX10 video card ?



You have a 2600XT. For gaming, Vista performance won't be very good so XP-64 is indeed a good option. If you had a more powerful card then Vista would be OK. But with your HD2600XT under Vista it would lower your performance.

Just because it's a DX10 card it doesn't mean you should go with Vista


Message edited by Pollux on 12-10-2007 at 10:00:50 PM
------------------------------ Maximus Formula SE | Q6600 @ 3.20Ghz | Zalman CNPS-9700LED | Patriot 2x1GB PC2-6400 4-4-4-12 | EVGA 8800GT Superclocked | 2x Barracuda 250GB 7200.10 RAID0
Reply to Pollux

Windows Server 2003 is still DX9 - it's identical code base to XP

You will have to enable DX as it comes disabled out of the box - then it will behave just like XP but enable 4GB RAM with 32bit - see the following for guidance http://www.visualwin.com/DirectX/

Reply to jamesgoddard

Pollux - you really think this card cant handle DX10 ?

------------------------------ Q6600 G0 @3.6 1.34v | GTX280 1GB | 26" Samsung T260| 19" 1907FP | Asus Maximus Formula X38 (Rampage Mod) | Kandalf VD4000 LCS | Ultra X2 750W | Supreme FXII 7.1 | Audio FX Pro 5.1 Headset | 4x1024 Ballistix Tracer 5-5-5-14 1066mhz | LG GGW-H20L
Reply to thecompukid

thecompukid wrote :

Pollux - you really think this card cant handle DX10 ?



The 2600xt will struggle with the latest DX10 games... have a look at the fllowing to see how the same hardware will perform much better in DX9 mode.. http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inqu [...] ot-desired

Reply to jamesgoddard
- 0 +

thecompukid wrote :

Pollux - you really think this card cant handle DX10 ?



I didn't say it can't hande it, but it will perform much better on DX9 than DX10 obviously.

Anyways, I don't see the need to go with 4Ghz of RAM since there won't be any noticeable performance boost

You asked why go with XP if you had a DX10 card, and your thread's question was about Windows Server 2003, so why go with Windows Server 2003 if you have a DX10 card?

I'm just saying you will get better performance under XP than Vista, and your card can cerrtainly handle DX10 but I don't think you'll be happy playing DX10 games under 10fps (10 beng too generous)

------------------------------ Maximus Formula SE | Q6600 @ 3.20Ghz | Zalman CNPS-9700LED | Patriot 2x1GB PC2-6400 4-4-4-12 | EVGA 8800GT Superclocked | 2x Barracuda 250GB 7200.10 RAID0
Reply to Pollux

don't think you'll be happy playing DX10 games under 10fps (10 beng too generous)

LoL

Ok just curious. I agree 100% with the better performance in DX9.x though. Im gonna load XP64 and give it a try tonight.

------------------------------ Q6600 G0 @3.6 1.34v | GTX280 1GB | 26" Samsung T260| 19" 1907FP | Asus Maximus Formula X38 (Rampage Mod) | Kandalf VD4000 LCS | Ultra X2 750W | Supreme FXII 7.1 | Audio FX Pro 5.1 Headset | 4x1024 Ballistix Tracer 5-5-5-14 1066mhz | LG GGW-H20L
Reply to thecompukid
- 0 +

Look at these benchmarks and then 'LoL':

http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inqu [...] ot-desired

HiS HD2600XT:

Crysis - DX10 - 1024x768 0xAA 0xAF : 7.5FPS
Call of Juarez - DX10 - 1024x768 0xAA 0xAF : 18.8FPS
World in Conflict - DX10 - 1024x768 0xAA 0xAF: 15FPS
Company of Heroes - DX10 - 1024x768 0xAA 0xAF: 20FPS

But of course, why would you play at 1024x768 on a 22 inch screen? turn resolution a bit higher and then you get the 10FPS i was talking about, nevermind the AA and AF

And consider the system that was used on the tests has:

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6800 @2.93 GHz
Zalman CNPS7700-Cu Cooler
Gigabyte P35-DQ6 Motherboard
2GB Corsair Dominator PC2-9136C5D (1142 MHzstock 5-5-5-15)
250GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 16MB cache

The results are much more positive under DX9, hence my suggestion towards XP rather than Vista.

------------------------------ Maximus Formula SE | Q6600 @ 3.20Ghz | Zalman CNPS-9700LED | Patriot 2x1GB PC2-6400 4-4-4-12 | EVGA 8800GT Superclocked | 2x Barracuda 250GB 7200.10 RAID0
Reply to Pollux

Update!

This new Radeon is kicking ass in XP 64bit, Im also loading Vista Ultimate 64 on another hard drive right now to test it also.

I will try to do some benches for ya.

------------------------------ Q6600 G0 @3.6 1.34v | GTX280 1GB | 26" Samsung T260| 19" 1907FP | Asus Maximus Formula X38 (Rampage Mod) | Kandalf VD4000 LCS | Ultra X2 750W | Supreme FXII 7.1 | Audio FX Pro 5.1 Headset | 4x1024 Ballistix Tracer 5-5-5-14 1066mhz | LG GGW-H20L
Reply to thecompukid

In my experience server 2003 makes a poor gaming platform. Largely due to it, for some inexplicable reason, disabling advanced graphics capabilities when it is in use as a domain controller. Maybe it is to encourage you to not use a server for software better left to a workstation where a crash won't take down the network.

Regardless it is not a very good performer even without a domain running on it.

Reply to infornography42
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Games General > PC Gaming > Server 2003 & gaming
Go to:

There are 623 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them