so ive been lookin up assassins creed for PC.
when they say recommended requirements, does that mean with that set of hardware, i should be able to run the game at max res, detail, full AA and everything?
usually recommended requirements are what are needed in order to play it with decent graphical settings, but nowhere near maxed out.
Minimum is what is needed in order to run it bare bones or slightly higher.
Usually if you are looking to max out the graphical settings on any recent game you need a pretty high end rig.
Note: When Microsoft lists minimum and recommended for their operating systems, the recommended settings are required to run the OS and anything else at all. With Minimum you might be able to handle paint and notepad ;-).
really? assasin's creed is THAT taxing?
basically, what strange is saying is that the way it used to be, game's miminmum settings were what was neccesary to run it with a smooth framerate, people still got it to run - but nowadays they just give u the actual minimum, and god help you if you are below that
yep, apparently the requirements for assassins creed blow out crysis's requirements. i think some other recommendations are like 3 gigs of ram and top dual core or quadcore or something like that. its just insane now. i guess the delay for assassins creed on pc was neccessary... i just might have to get a new graphics card dam.... not in the mood to..
Those are steep requirements. Will the game be that impressive, or Is this game going to be a terrible port with limited detail settings? Test drive unlimited was rediculous that way. Low, Med, high were the only system (graphics) settings and even low required a pretty hefty CPU for that time period.