I have installed crysis on my system recently with the 1.2v patch. Installation went fine wit no errors. Currently when I start the game there is a huge lag with the first intro and the nvidia screen but the second intro screen works fine. The game is very laggy at menu so I did not even bother trying to start a game.
Current Drivers:
catalyst 8.2, did not update to 8.3 because I heard of its issues and fps drops.
CPU specs:
e2160 OC to 3ghz
HIS 3850 256mb OC'd to 749/1026
2 gigs of Gskill ram at 5/5/5/12 running 1:1
All my other games work fine at full settings with no lag like cs:source, hl2, condemned...
Is there a specific driver fix? The last time I tried installing a hotfix it completely ruined my system and I had to reinstall everything.
I really think you should at least TRY and load a part of the game engine.... it might just be a weird glitch in the menu - apart from that, you could try turning down the graphics....
I decided to load the game and I get an average of 30 fps with settings on high but the game crashed once I got to the docks. Ill try another run later tonight and see how it goes.
Computer struggling in the Entry screens = DRM very often. Your PC checks for a valid version of the game and while reading from your CD or DVD it slowns down performance dramatically.
Your PC crashes minutes later: could be an Overclocking and/or heat issues. Try to bring these back at stock speed and see what happens then.
Furthermore, it's hard to compare the performance between Crysis and CS:Source or similar simply because you are comparing 2 very difference engines; CryEngine is a next-gen engine whereas CS:Source is using a 5 year old engine and the technicallities are quite different. In any case, I hope this works out for you.
Message edited by Alex The PC Gamer on 03-11-2008 at 11:20:39 PM
------------------------------Windows XP MCE & Vista 64-bit (dual boot)
XFX NFORCE 680I LT SLI w/ OCZ Platinum 4 Gigs Dual DDR2 @ 800MHz
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.4GHz w/ ChillTec Thermo Electric CPU Cooler
MSI NX8800 GTX & X-Fi XtremeGamer Soundblaster
Reply to Alex The PC Gamer
Im using a no cd patch and its still the same issue with entry screens. Its funny how the crytek and intel entry screens are smooth while nvidia and the first screen is horribly laggy. My computer passed prime95 and orthos for 8 hours each with my cpu at 50c max. Im up to the part with the tanks so that random crash might just be the game itself who knows.
The game is crap and demands too much. I haven't even bothered with it, and I'm running an 8800GTX Tri-SLI rig.
The graphics are not even THAT amazing that they should require so much power, and without the graphics its a decidedly average game.
I may play it through in a couple of years on a Geforce 11....
Darkstar, I have to agree with you. I picked up the game the other day. My off-the-cuff reaction is that it doesn't "look" like it should have such demanding hardware requirements. It doesn't look bad, of course, but it's not as jaw-dropping as I would have expected. Nothing looks particularly revolutionary to me.
But it's frustrating having to "dumb" the settings down as much as I do in order to get it playable. Granted, I'm running 64-bit Vista (which doesn't help), and the native resolution on my display is 2560x1600, which I couldn't even DREAM of trying to run Crysis at. But, for god's sake, I'm using an HD3870 X2. I shouldn't have to make so many compromises on the graphics settings. Not for a game that looks current-gen to me.
I picked this game up last weekend, and got myself all HYPED for my first play and.........
well, yes. It doesn't look BAD, but somehow I was expecting more.
This can't be attributed to the game, probably more the HYPe that has been flying around.
Plus.
I don't find it that great of a shooter. It's too slow (personal preference). I much prefer COD4.
------------------------------GA-X38-DS4 (BIOS F3)||E8400 C2D (3.6GHz)||2x 1Gb Crucial Ballistix DDR2-800 4-4-4-12||320Gb WD Caviar||2x 750Gb WD Caviar||Cooler Master Real Power Pro 750W||2x HD4870 512Mb(Crossfire)||HT Omega Striker 7.1
Reply to jay_l_a
Darkstar, I have to agree with you. I picked up the game the other day. My off-the-cuff reaction is that it doesn't "look" like it should have such demanding hardware requirements. It doesn't look bad, of course, but it's not as jaw-dropping as I would have expected. Nothing looks particularly revolutionary to me.
But it's frustrating having to "dumb" the settings down as much as I do in order to get it playable. Granted, I'm running 64-bit Vista (which doesn't help), and the native resolution on my display is 2560x1600, which I couldn't even DREAM of trying to run Crysis at. But, for god's sake, I'm using an HD3870 X2. I shouldn't have to make so many compromises on the graphics settings. Not for a game that looks current-gen to me.
Agreed. Played through it once. Some things are nice and such but in the end I was not as impressed as I was when I saw HL2. HL2 made more leaps and bounds in graphics than Crysis has. In fact some things in HL2 seem better, such as facial animations and at least HL2 has ragdolls without a mod.
64bit vista should actually be better for crysis, I'm also running Vista Ultimate x64 with 8GB RAM
Crysis has a 64 bit executable which uses the extra RAM... or at least, doesn't swap to disk as much.
But yeah, even running at 1280x800 I couldn't play it the way I wanted.
Still, I haven't touched it since just after release.
It seems like there were a lot of issues with Vista. Crysis ran like ass for me in Vista 64 bit with 2x 8800GTX SLI and 8gigs ram, but runs perfectly max everything in windows XP @ 1920x1200 (with the config fixes to give "DX10 effects" in DX9). I haven't tried updating to 1.2 yet, same thing happened to me where I basically just lost interest in it.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.