I simply do not understand why so many people need to bash PC gaming. Just because consoles are the more popular platform doesn't mean PC gaming sucks. It's like saying a Toyota Camry is better than a Ferrari because Toyota sells more cars, it doesnt make sense.
 
If you like consoles and their shoddy control options, go for it. Stop bashing us PC gamers because we have real jobs and can afford real gaming platforms.

Its true anyone can go buy a console but can everyone build a computer that can actually run good games pc gaming will always be better and more advanced when do you guys think crysis is going to come out on console? Ill tell you NEVER console don't have the power to run it, a beastly computer can i have the consoles but since I got my new  computer they're collecting dust in my basement. A computer is always going to be better then a console its plain and simple console can play games a computer can do almost anything!

Graphics don't make a good game so just because you can run ultra high resolutions doesn't make it more fun (wow factor runs out in about 20 minutes).  Consoles do certain types of games very well (FPS and fighting games along with simple interface RPGs ).  
 
However, the types of games I enjoy the most require a keyboard and mouse.
MMOs
Simulations
RTS
Turn based games (civilization for example)
 
The reality is the newer consoles are just PCs with a stripped down OS.  They have USB ports so you can stick on a mouse and keyboard.  Plenty of people run linux on them.  This is where the era of computing should go instead of massive bloatware.

I like both, but the PC lineup has become rather dull recently to developers jumping ship.  

Anyone who thinks consoles are better than PC's for First Person Shooters is delusional!

Oh no!  Not another why PC > Consoles or why your machine < mine kind of post.
 
But I like the anology though.  I suddenly feel much better that I am driving a Ferrari - though a lower end one with an older engine ...

You don't have the talent to complete Doom 3 or Bioshock? lol

Good question tho, when are they going to port Crysis to the console?

 
Crytek confirmed that they're working on a console project, although i can't remember the details. I reckon there'll be a version of Crysis out for at least the 360 by Q2 2009.

This may actually put an end to all the bickering between the console vs pc thing. At leas I hope so

The only difference between a PC and a console is the purpose they are used for. Once the consoles went to USB ports, Networking, and USB ports you will be hard pressed to find the overall difference between the 2 besides the operating system.  Install linux on a box and it is effectively transparent to the user.  
 
I wonder how much better Crysis would have run on the same hardware if it had been on windows 2000 with opengl 2.0 rather than making DirectX10 only for vista.

 
We'll see.  When Duke Nukem gets released.

 
That's just being narrow-minded... both PCs and consoles have very nice FPS games and to be honest I prefer them on a console. Don't get me wrong, I love the Orange Box and Bioshock (PC ver) but there's something about the way you control a character with sticks that I like, and having everything at your fingertips... or maybe it's just the fact I can play a console from my bed. Played Shadowrun on both PC and xbox, and while the game is the same the control schemes were different and I prefered the xbox version. That, and I'm much better at headshots with a controller than a mouse.

 
It will probably become a joke, like Far Cry (I heard it was great on the gamecube LOL) on the consoles..

Crysis Vengence Wii edition.  Oooh, yummy.
 
 
Farcry Vengence is about the cheapest wii game you'll find as it's major lamo. I bought it for $15, read some reviews, and returned it unopened.  
 
Side note, I know some console guys who struggle to adjust to the KB/Mouse for FPS games, but IMO once you adjust no way would you want to play fps games on a gamepad.  

Now that they sell wireless X360 controllers for PCs and consoles can take USB keyboards and such, isn't arguing of which has the better control mechanism a moot point?
 
And as for price, remember that most people want/need a computer regardless of gaming.  Even people who are computer illiterate own computers nowadays.  So most of the up front cost of PC gaming is already "paid for", you just need to spend $129 on a 9600GT 512MB or a few $ more on a 8800GT.  Any desktop computer produced within the last year or so has a dual-core, current-gen proc and 1-3GB of RAM, which is plenty.
 
Used PC games are available cheap on E-Bay and are very reasonable when purchased brand-new at a B&M.  If you don't care about the latest and greatest games, there are hundreds of home-brew, open-source, abondonware and demo games freely available on the Internet[s].

 
You're just being cheap   For $15 you could have tried it for yourself... If you still think it's too expensive just convert it euro's  

Hope he doesnt have a yin for yen....

The problem with the higher end cards is the power supply.  Most people buy a cheap machine (example dell inspirons for 350 dollars) with a low power supply (250 watt).  Also people only upgrade when their system dies or no longer works for them.  So you can expect 5 year old systems to still be used by many people.  So remember PCI cards vs. AGP or PCI express is the target audience you need for mass appeal games (WoW for example or warcraft 3).

I have long debated this issue with my friends as I am a hardcore PC gamer, and have been for the last 10 years.  I recently bought my son a 360, which of course I have been playing, so I have been struggling over whether to upgrade my aging PC. (Dell XPS gen 3)  
 
The issue of whether the PC or a console is better is largely moot, because the simple reality is that developers have all jumped ship to console development because that is where the money at.  If we are lucky, the PC might get a late port.  Look at Mass Effect and Assassin's Creed, both came to the Xbox first, and months later, to the PC.   Gamedaily.com as well as PC Gamer magazine have all had a number of articles lamenting the demise of PC gaming.  FPS and adventure titles, that 5 years ago were only available on the PC, now are developed for consoles first, and maybe, if we are lucky, will go to the PC eventually.  People will quickly cry "but what about WOW?"  Well, that's true, the last stand for PC gaming will be MMO's.  But I want to play AAA class FPS titles on my PC in 1280 resolution with antialiasing turned on, not MMO's.  The only thing left for PC's are MMO's and RTS titles.  
 
As small as the rack is for PC games in your local video store now, I'll be surprised if it is there at all in two years.  
 
I love PC gaming and prefer it vastly to the 360, but like the HD war, the war is over.  I can love HD all I want, but by year's end all that will be available is Blue Ray titles.  And likewise, I can love and prefer PC gaming all I want, but there are fewer and fewer exclusive titles, as well as fewer and fewer console first titles that are even being ported to the PC.  The next big Star Wars game, Force Unleashed, isn't even being developed at all for the PC.  Sad but true.    
 
Everytime I play an xbox game I notice the jaggies and the overall poor graphics and imagine how nice it would look on a PC. (with exception to COD4 and Bioshock, which looked great)
 
But, it is what it is.  The one thing I do like about the 360 is when I put the disk in the console, I know the game will run OK.  (if the box works of course)  No driver downloads, no videocard upgrades, no tweaking for a good framerate, the damn game just plays.  That ease of play is something the PC and its infinite technology arms race never did well, and what made consoles popular in the first place.