Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows XP > General Discussion > Is it 'safe' to defrag under XP?

Is it 'safe' to defrag under XP?

Forum Windows XP : General Discussion Is it 'safe' to defrag under XP?

Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers (More info?)

 

I recently upgraded from 98SE - I rarely ran a defrag under 98SE
because after I did, the system always seemed a little unstable for a
day or two. Nothing major, but an extra crash or two, occasionally had
to re-install an App. Did they get it right for XP (Home, SP2)? I s
defrag totally painless?

thanks
/j

Reply to Anonymous
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers (More info?)

 

I defrag in XP, need to about every week. I normally see a speed-up (i have 3
machines). Hope this helps.

"Jeff W" wrote:

> I recently upgraded from 98SE - I rarely ran a defrag under 98SE
> because after I did, the system always seemed a little unstable for a
> day or two. Nothing major, but an extra crash or two, occasionally had
> to re-install an App. Did they get it right for XP (Home, SP2)? I s
> defrag totally painless?
>
> thanks
> /j
>

Reply to Tony

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers (More info?)

 

Hey Jeff! :-)

XP's defrag works just fine, but a third-party app like Diskeeper or
PerfectDisk gives more options and better performance.

--
James M. Fisher
MS MVP Windows Shell/User
Service Pack 2 Master List:
http://jmfmvps.mvps.org/SP2.htm

<Please reply in the newsgroups>
"Tony" <Tony@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:AA29B665-C084-4975-96C0-B7C75269C8B1@microsoft.com...
>I defrag in XP, need to about every week. I normally see a speed-up (i have
>3
> machines). Hope this helps.
>
> "Jeff W" wrote:
>
>> I recently upgraded from 98SE - I rarely ran a defrag under 98SE
>> because after I did, the system always seemed a little unstable for a
>> day or two. Nothing major, but an extra crash or two, occasionally had
>> to re-install an App. Did they get it right for XP (Home, SP2)? I s
>> defrag totally painless?
>>
>> thanks
>> /j
>>

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers (More info?)

 

James M. Fisher [MVP] wrote:

> Hey Jeff! :-)
>
> XP's defrag works just fine, but a third-party app like Diskeeper or
> PerfectDisk gives more options and better performance.
>

I believe XPs defrag is Diskeeper in a cut down form

Reply to martin
- 0 +

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers (More info?)

 

Martin wrote:

> I believe XPs defrag is Diskeeper in a cut down form


You are indeed quite right Martin, as i would expect from someone called
Martin! lol.

--
Best Wishes from Martin

So many questions, so few answers.

Reply to martin
- 0 +

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers (More info?)

 

Martin wrote:
> Martin wrote:
>
>> I believe XPs defrag is Diskeeper in a cut down form
>
>
>
> You are indeed quite right Martin, as i would expect from someone called
> Martin! lol.
>
I had to look twice when you replied to the post about Firefox :)

cheers

Reply to martin

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers (More info?)

 

"Martin" <martin.s@dsl.pipexdotcom> wrote in message
news:uj0CNzDxEHA.1524@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Martin wrote:
>
>> I believe XPs defrag is Diskeeper in a cut down form
>
>
> You are indeed quite right Martin, as i would expect from someone called
> Martin! lol.
>
> --
> Best Wishes from Martin
>
> So many questions, so few answers.

If you use Diskeeper, it will be impossible to see where the relationship is
between Diskeeper and the WINXP Defragger. Whereas 'Executive' may have had
some involvement in developing the MS WINXP defragger I suspect any
relationship with the present version of Diskeeper is remote to say the very
least.

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers (More info?)

 

Hi,

or you try mst Defrag (http://www.mstsoftware.com). It's very fast and it
consumes only small memory.

If you like you can read a test on Kickstart News:
http://www.kickstartnews.com/revie [...] ation.html

Bye
Rob

"James M. Fisher [MVP]" <xrayjames@msn.com> wrote in message news:<ONI1JGCxEHA.3624@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>...
> Hey Jeff! :-)
>
> XP's defrag works just fine, but a third-party app like Diskeeper or
> PerfectDisk gives more options and better performance.
>
> --
> James M. Fisher
> MS MVP Windows Shell/User
> Service Pack 2 Master List:
> http://jmfmvps.mvps.org/SP2.htm
>
> <Please reply in the newsgroups>
> "Tony" <Tony@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:AA29B665-C084-4975-96C0-B7C75269C8B1@microsoft.com...
> >I defrag in XP, need to about every week. I normally see a speed-up (i have
> >3
> > machines). Hope this helps.
> >
> > "Jeff W" wrote:
> >
> >> I recently upgraded from 98SE - I rarely ran a defrag under 98SE
> >> because after I did, the system always seemed a little unstable for a
> >> day or two. Nothing major, but an extra crash or two, occasionally had
> >> to re-install an App. Did they get it right for XP (Home, SP2)? I s
> >> defrag totally painless?
> >>
> >> thanks
> >> /j
> >>

Reply to RobR
Register or log in to remove.
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows XP > General Discussion > Is it 'safe' to defrag under XP?
Go to:

There are 1724 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Ads
Latest best answer
Windows Xp Blue Screen
By nhasian, 10 hours ago:

looks like the problem was caused by the nvidia display driver or the gpu itself. try...

Best offers
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
Top experts