Tom's Hardware > Forum > Games General > Games General Discussions > E3 08: Crysis Warhead Hands-On Preview

E3 08: Crysis Warhead Hands-On Preview

Forum Games General : Games General Discussions - E3 08: Crysis Warhead Hands-On Preview

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Preview by Devin Connors

Crytek showed off its upcoming expansion title Crysis: Warhead at E3 this week, and the developer says the game will be much easier on PC hardware than the original Crysis. Tom's Games takes Warhead for a spin.

http://www.tomsgames.com/us/2008/0 [...] d_preview/


Message edited by robwright on 07-18-2008 at 06:58:46 PM
------------------------------ "Would you qualify that as a launch problem or a design problem?"
--Chris Knight

 

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

That would be great if we could get a game that looked as good as Crysis but had lower requirements..

Good article..

------------------------------ E7200 @ 2.53Ghz, 2 gigs Mushkin ddr2 800, Gigabyte EP45-UD3R, Western Digital 640 gig, Gigabyte HD 4850 512MB, Asus DVD burner, HP w2007 monitor...
http://i299.photobucket.com/albums/mm282/alphahuman98/masterchiefdancing_4-1.gif

 

Reply to physx7

Quote :

Warhead now looks just as good as the original, uses the same (but slightly tweaked) engine, and can run on high using an 8800GT.


High is no problem for my 8800GT at 1440x900, it's very high that does the damage. And the FPS drop is justified; very high truly puts Crysis in a league of its own.

As for the gameplay, more Crysis = more good as far as I'm concerned.

Reply to homerdog

Any news on if it uses 4 cores better? I'm still not quite ready to upgrade from my old G80 8800GTS 640, but if it can use all of my Q6600 I'll definitely be good.

Reply to BallistaMan

Nice to see they cleaned up the code.

Reply to NarwhaleAu

Same gameplay is a bad thing. I just did not like Crysis' gameplay at all. In theory it sounds great, but actually playing it, it was dull and boring. The graphics weren't the problem at all and I think it would've played fine on older systems if people actually lowered their settings, but everyone wanted to play it on the highest settings even if their computer couldn't handle it.

 

Anyways, back to my point... the original just did not feel right all the way around. The suit controls were overpowered. Stealth, kill, stealth, kill. Sure, you could go out of your way to make it more challenging, but it still wasn't as satisfying as Far Cry. Plus, the guns felt extremely underpowered which made it all the more lame when they could take down trees. And the game lacked any blood or dead body manipulation. For a game that's striving to be realistic, those two things stuck out like a sore thumb. And houses felt like they were made from a deck of cards. You could run into a wall and the house would start to fall apart. So the graphics were the least of the problems, in my opinion. The graphics and steep requirements were probably its biggest draw.

 

But the biggest problems were probably the short and linear levels. It wasn't as long as Far Cry and it wasn't as expansive, and the cliffhanger ending sucked. And I really hated the aliens. Maybe I just hate squid things. I even hated the Matrix squid things.

 

I liked the different weapon attachments and customizing your guns and of course the graphics but that's about it. I'm more interested in Far Cry 2 right now.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Maxor127 on 07-18-2008 at 09:34:46 AM
Reply to Maxor127

^Those are all valid complaints, especially the one about guns being underpowered. This was improved upon in the 1.2 patch and things are much better now. At least it doesn't take half a clip to take down the grunts like it used to. A nice "thump" sound has also been added when your shots connect, which is quite handy indeed.

Reply to homerdog
- 0 +

Rob (Devin who wrote it) when you say "high" settings, do you mean "high" or "very high", I was under the impression that a core 2 e6750, 8800Gt, etc could play the game on "high" (the system mentioned also uses 2.5GB ram).

I play on "very high" (no AA/AF) with a q6600, 2gb ddr2 667, 9800GTX, etc, but with only 25-30 fps outdoors.

Online co-op would be great.. I don't think anyone's really got the AI to work in multi, i've seen one mod, but it was just zombies..


Message edited by STEMNIN on 07-18-2008 at 01:58:52 PM
------------------------------ http://img186.imageshack.us/img186/4645/sig1xl2.jpg
Reply to STEMNIN
- 0 +

the link is broken?

Reply to spuddyt

I've seen the videos from E3 and the game is Crysis. I don't know what system they were playing on but it ran quite smoothly.

IMO, Crysis was already "way advanced" so no big tweaks are required. Like many, I just want to continue where Crysis left off. I do find it weird/ackward/bizarre to play as Psycho thou.

Hopefully, Warhead is as long (if not longer) than Crysis.


Message edited by Alex The PC Gamer on 07-18-2008 at 06:53:00 PM
------------------------------ Windows XP MCE & Vista 64-bit (dual boot)
XFX NFORCE 680I LT SLI w/ OCZ Platinum 4 Gigs Dual DDR2 @ 800MHz
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.4GHz w/ ChillTec Thermo Electric CPU Cooler
MSI NX8800 GTX & X-Fi XtremeGamer Soundblaster
Reply to Alex The PC Gamer

Maxor127 wrote :

S The suit controls were overpowered. Stealth, kill, stealth, kill. Sure, you could go out of your way to make it more challenging, but it still wasn't as satisfying as Far Cry.



I actually found the suit underpowered with a very weak strength mode, short speed mode, short cloak mode and very low hp.

Reply to darthvaderkenneth

8800GT on high at what resolution though?

Reply to randomizer
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Games General > Games General Discussions > E3 08: Crysis Warhead Hands-On Preview
Go to:

There are 721 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
  • 01:00 raulkm won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 letus won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 pmiddy won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 MarcieMark won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 kaypeezee won the Uniformed badge
  • 04:06 xyz001 won the Sophmore badge
  • 01:00 scione won the Freshman badge
  • 01:32 aford10 won the Home Brew badge
  • 01:00 Kevinator won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 adis won the Uniformed badge