So. I don't have a console, so correct me if I'm wrong, but the first xbox360 released can play the same titles that the newest one can. I don't even know if the performance is any different. You have to tell me.
Meanwhile the performance of PC's from 2005 will have grown tenfold. Yet an xbox360 from 2005 can power far cry 3 just as a 2000€ PC from today can.
Before you frantically begin explaining me how pc graphics are over 9000 times better I know this. Only that if viewing far cry 3 the difference is so small in the first look. Okay, the resolution is smaller, textures are lower res and other details aren't there but generally speaking the difference is not 8 years worthy.
Here's a video: www.youtube.com/watch?v=mz8paB0KOHQ
I know the developers are using some serious ghetto hacks on xbox360 to be able to pull this off, and for example far cry3 grass is completely wack even on PC because of that. And again I say that how can you make far cry 3 look comparable on 8 year old mediocre spec and brand new high end pc?
I also know that the consoles have been seriously slowing down graphics develpoment of games, but that is not the issue in this topic. What I want to discuss with you is how the hell is it even possible for an 8years old console to run games like far cry3, and More Importantly!, why have the PC requirements grown yet Xbox remains the same? Are the devs just lazy and make poorly optimised ports or are the graphics on PC's really using up all the power of today's gaming computers? If they are, why are the differences so minute? (Yes tesselation is nice, Yes AA is nice, Yes 8k textures are nice, but if comparing 1997 games to 2005 games you will see what a proper world of difference is.)
The difference is in specs is such also because of the hardware industry lobby. This cannot be denied. nvidia, intel and amd are pressing on the gaming industry to raise the specs. It is an important factor to note. So are we PC gamers getting fucked by everyone? The hardware makers and the game industry? Are we just the suckers everyone can abuse?
I look forward to reading your reply!
Cheers!
I will add some comparison shots:
skyrim:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-9ivkuf5iHzM/UDnDGL0-fQI/AAAAAAAAAXU/7OxsESXO2gU/s1600/comapreeee.jpg
crysis2:
http://bossfightgamingblog.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/crysis_2_pc_xbox_360_vun9r.jpg
http://fileframe.sector.sk/files/novinky/2011-3-2-20-8-31/pict-370.jpg¸
crysis3:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hGRI7_jPL2U
YOU ARE NEVER going to convice me the difference is worth the crysis pc specs! Or am I just stupid and am viewing a comparison of prerendered videos? xD
Meanwhile the performance of PC's from 2005 will have grown tenfold. Yet an xbox360 from 2005 can power far cry 3 just as a 2000€ PC from today can.
Before you frantically begin explaining me how pc graphics are over 9000 times better I know this. Only that if viewing far cry 3 the difference is so small in the first look. Okay, the resolution is smaller, textures are lower res and other details aren't there but generally speaking the difference is not 8 years worthy.
Here's a video: www.youtube.com/watch?v=mz8paB0KOHQ
I know the developers are using some serious ghetto hacks on xbox360 to be able to pull this off, and for example far cry3 grass is completely wack even on PC because of that. And again I say that how can you make far cry 3 look comparable on 8 year old mediocre spec and brand new high end pc?
I also know that the consoles have been seriously slowing down graphics develpoment of games, but that is not the issue in this topic. What I want to discuss with you is how the hell is it even possible for an 8years old console to run games like far cry3, and More Importantly!, why have the PC requirements grown yet Xbox remains the same? Are the devs just lazy and make poorly optimised ports or are the graphics on PC's really using up all the power of today's gaming computers? If they are, why are the differences so minute? (Yes tesselation is nice, Yes AA is nice, Yes 8k textures are nice, but if comparing 1997 games to 2005 games you will see what a proper world of difference is.)
The difference is in specs is such also because of the hardware industry lobby. This cannot be denied. nvidia, intel and amd are pressing on the gaming industry to raise the specs. It is an important factor to note. So are we PC gamers getting fucked by everyone? The hardware makers and the game industry? Are we just the suckers everyone can abuse?
I look forward to reading your reply!
Cheers!
I will add some comparison shots:
skyrim:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-9ivkuf5iHzM/UDnDGL0-fQI/AAAAAAAAAXU/7OxsESXO2gU/s1600/comapreeee.jpg
crysis2:
http://bossfightgamingblog.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/crysis_2_pc_xbox_360_vun9r.jpg
http://fileframe.sector.sk/files/novinky/2011-3-2-20-8-31/pict-370.jpg¸
crysis3:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hGRI7_jPL2U
YOU ARE NEVER going to convice me the difference is worth the crysis pc specs! Or am I just stupid and am viewing a comparison of prerendered videos? xD