Quick sync doesn't work with a discrete graphics card, only HD graphics. They do offer models like the 3350p with out the HD graphics, although they are still on the chip, they are just disabled I believe.
Personally I think they should offer at least a 3570k and 3770k without HD graphics even physically on the chip, and for a cheaper price. Like 50 bucks off. I know the HD graphics cost at least a quarter of what they are selling these chips for. And for people who don't use quick sync, like myself, why should we have to waste money on the HD graphics. Your chip will probably even draw less power.
I have my HD graphics disabled through the BIOS. So I don't think I'm benefiting from any of what HD graphics has to offer. There's also plenty of programs that offer acceleration through your discrete graphics card too.
So although I don't have a big problem with HD 4000 graphics being on these chips, I don't see why you HAVE to get a feature you don't want or need. I think it's a waste of money for people like me, who only really care about gaming performance, overclocking, benchmarks, and nothing else.
And if they did offer such a chip, I bet hardly anyone would ever buy a regular 3570k or 3770k again. Because they can save money and actually get what they want and what they pay for. Because most people disable the HD graphics anyways, its just a shame they had to pay for it. I also think it's a shame that the new 4770k and 4670k only come with GT2 graphics and not GT3. Instead of giving us something we could actually game on, they give us something that we'll never, ever use. How the hell does that make sense? And we have to pay for that crap.