Which Better Pack For Gaming ?

[A2Creativity]

I recently browsing looking for new machine...
and i made 2 'packs' which including few parts that compatible for low budget, and i do wanna ask which one is better from 'packs' i've made...

Pack 1:
ASUS F1A55-M + AMD Athlon II X4 641

Or

Pack 2:
Biostar A55MH + AMD Athlon II X4 641 + HIS HD 6450

i read that asus has their own intergrated graphic card, it was HD 6000 Series, is that mean i don't have to buy a video card ? if so which version is the intergrated one (6000 Series has many version) ? and does it's performance same as non-intergrated one ?

[strike]about the other pack, would A55MH Compatible with AMD Athlon II X4 ?
Because i see it's cpu support was AMD A2-8, E2...[/strike]
nevermind about this question, Athlon II X4 is AMD A8... (Isn't it ?)

Thx in advance

 

[o1die]

The 641 has the onboard video disabled, but google it for confirmation. If true, then you'll need the 6450 in the second package.

 

[A2Creativity]

The 641 has the onboard video disabled, but google it for confirmation. If true, then you'll need the 6450 in the second package.

is that so ??
i've been googling before replying this... and i found nothing....

 

[o1die]

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-cpu-llano-fm1-athlon,14658.html. Notice the "inactive graphics unit" in the product description.

 

[A2Creativity]

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-cpu-llano-fm1-athlon,14658.html. Notice the "inactive graphics unit" in the product description.

hmm... that means i need the second pack.... thx alot...

anyway, does the integrated video or non-integrated affect the performance ?

 

[o1die]

I don't think it will affect performance at all. Not sure about overclocking. I gave up on overclocking for better stability, but you may have better luck with your cpu.