honestly, the game doesn't look bad, multiplayer is where its at, and single player is a big stupid action movie, which is fun to play through if you like those movies, sadly they always feel like you are playing the side kick instead of the main guy...
multiplayer... i despise vehicle combat, i hate it more than any one person can imagine. i hate driveing, i hate car to car combat, i just do not like it in games that werent 100% about being in the car (think twisted metal) i love the close quarters battlefield gameplay and maps, but i SO hate that they only gave you what... 8 maps at launch, and the close quarters was what 10-15$ 3-4 map dlc...
what i really want is a game like unreal with weapon progression like a battlefield or a COD, but because that is a pipe dream... i have to give it to cod just because of personal taste and they give me more of what i like up front, apposed to battlefield.
if either game supported modding, that would be the clear winner, but they dont, because of map packs.
Cons29 :
personally i dont buy cod/bf3 for single player, thats just a bonus for me. in fact, i only played coop and multi player, single player, no.
how long is single player? 6hrs? compared to hundreds of hours of MP, so it's bf3 for me, esp with cod's no-dedicated server (last time i looked), not wasting my money on them. and with a $20+ price difference (from where i am), ill get bf4 over this
if i remember right, only moder warfare 2 didnt have dedicated servers... or was it modern warfare 1... i forget...