Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Closed

Leaked Sony Xperia ZU Benchmark: Fastest Phone Yet?

Last response: in News comments
Share
June 18, 2013 1:20:37 PM

Yup the Note 3 killer
Score
0
June 18, 2013 1:23:53 PM

man i think the 3000 mAh battery is not super good for this size screen. Why not just go for 3500 mAh and thicken the phone a bit.
Score
0
June 18, 2013 1:50:17 PM

man i think the 3000 mAh battery is not super good for this size screen. Why not just go for 3500 mAh and thicken the phone a bit.
Score
0
June 18, 2013 1:59:47 PM

6.4 inch screen...more like a phablet.
Score
0
June 18, 2013 2:20:55 PM

So what does the quad core CPU get you? Phones don't really strike me as having multiple apps doing something useful at the same time. Give me a dual core and boost the battery life instead.
Score
0
June 18, 2013 2:59:38 PM

Parsian said:
man i think the 3000 mAh battery is not super good for this size screen. Why not just go for 3500 mAh and thicken the phone a bit.


Fully agree, I am starting to get sick of the design focus phones have, I want function, stability and battery life. Though this looks pretty good specs wise, more battery and a little thickness would go a long way in my opinion
Score
0
June 18, 2013 3:01:08 PM

Sounds like a beast, and that size is not for everyone. Nevertheless, it will be very hard for any phone to beat it.
Score
0
June 18, 2013 4:12:44 PM

I'm highly suspect of a 6.4" and a high powered 2.2ghz cortex a15 based quad core design soc giving enough battery life on 3000mah. They already cant fit batteries larger then that in smaler phones. I'd feel a lot better about this phone if it had atleast a 3750mah battery or better yet 4000mah which shouldnt be a problem at 6.4 inches.
Score
0
June 18, 2013 7:32:38 PM

If they will make the battery removable so a person can have a spare or two for a quick change, I may very well be considering this as my next phone.
Score
0
June 19, 2013 4:22:28 PM

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2415809,00.asp
tegra4 36489 antutu, but it remains to be seen if they can get that in a phone at 1.9ghz. Though it seems 1.8ghz would be very close or above S800 here anyway. I'm wondering what battery life would be like at 1.7-1.8ghz (all A15's suck power, but samsung is running theirs so we'll have to see). Samsung has theirs at 1.6ghz, so even 1.7 seems doable & should be not much of a loss vs. S800. So the question is the gpu and actual perf in games (and who looks better), not to mention we have nothing on the power use of S800 yet or T4 for that matter, but we should have an idea with shield in a few weeks. Curious about the price also, though with previous socs from NV being $23-25 not sure this makes much difference in a build price...LOL. Also who knows how bad it would be in battery with a modem added. I'm guessing S800 comes out pretty good in the phone fight, but T4 is aimed at tablets sans modem.

T4i is a whole other issue as it's aimed at $100-200 phones with larger sales volumes so NV should do pretty well on both fronts. In a tablet S800 clearly loses in cpu already, so again only the gpu is in questions. Even at 2.3ghz S800 cpu won't win in a tablet (100mhz doesn't make up 4000 points in antutu).
Score
0
!