airborne11b :
I have a 3D vision 2 monitor and love it. It makes games look so much better and the 3D offered by it is so much better than what you get in the movies.
I love my multi-monitor setup and my 2560 x 1440 monitor as well, but if a game does a good job supporting 3D, I always plug it in first.
But I can understand why some people don't care for it too much.
3D Gaming and 3D TV are two entirely different experiences. Typically, 3D games are meant to make you feel enmeshed in the game. One DOS game from years ago, Descent 3D, was extremely good at putting you in the environment of the game when played in 3D mode.
Movies and TV are not the same experience as 3D gaming. They both have nowhere near the sophistication that would be required to put you into the scene that you are currently viewing. For the foreseeable future, they will undoubtedly lack that technical sophistication as the technology has progressed little from the 1950's. What would be required, technology wise, is well beyond current movie and TV capabilities. For 3D movies and TV, there is little added depth, and the 3D versions of any movie or TV show are substantially dimmer than the 2D version. For the movie and the TV industry, my opinion (which is echoed by others) is that 3D is a gimmick to charge higher prices at the box office and get consumers to buy new TVs. As I see it, there is no added value in either.
Personally, I have only seen one movie that had content that was best suited to 3D. It was called "Cave of Forgotten Dreams." Even that movie, though, would have provided a great experience in 2D only.
I saw Avatar in IMAX 3D, and later bought the 2D Blu-ray version. After viewing the 2D Blu-ray version, I concluded that 3D added nothing to the movie.
IMHO, the sooner 3D disappears completely from the TV and movie market, the better.