I know the differences between SLC, MLC and TLC. SLC has the highest life expectancy but is not affordable on a consumer base level.
MLC- Multi Layer Cell
Lower endurance limit than SLC
10,000 program/erase cycles per cell
A good fit for consumer products. Not suggested for applications which require frequent update of data.
TLC- Three Layer Cell
Lower endurance limit than MLC and SLC
TLC has slower read and write speeds than conventional MLC
5,000 program/erase cycles per cell
Best price point
A good fit for low-end basic products. Not suggested for critical or important applications at this time which require frequent updating of data.
Therefore you are left with MLC and TLC. As I mentioned before I want reliability and speed so I am leaning towards MLC drives rather than a TLC drive. But with the onset of the new TLC drives that have been said to last 11 years or how much longer does an MLC drive last in comparison. And with the newer technologies built into these NAND's I can not only see lower latency but better life expectancy. So I want some opinions on the life expectancy of newer drives like the 840 EVO and the Pro vs and MLC drive. I also want some recommendations for MLC drives that provide low latency read and writes.
I'm looking for either a 250 or 500 GB drive with company that has a great track record such as Intel or Samsung in the SSD world for both MLC and TLC drives. And if anyone has an opinion as to why I should choose one over another.