System Builder Marathon, Q3 2013: $350 Bonus Entry-Level PC
Tags:
-
Overclocking
-
Gaming
-
Desktops
- Buyer's Guides
- Build Your Own
Last response: in Reviews comments
pauldh
September 26, 2013 9:00:04 PM
Last quarter's bonus build was a $400 mini-ITX-based gaming rig, designed to be about the same size as a new console. This time around, we're slashing the budget even more to see if we can build a viable general-purpose PC for about $350 using an APU.
System Builder Marathon, Q3 2013: $350 Bonus Entry-Level PC : Read more
System Builder Marathon, Q3 2013: $350 Bonus Entry-Level PC : Read more
More about : system builder marathon 2013 350 bonus entry level
Nice choice in parts (unlike their mid/high end counterparts, the low end MSI boards continue to disappoint. Maybe consider Biostar, ECS, or ASRock in future low end builds) . However, those wanting to cheat can pickup a 750K with 7770 within $20-30 of the price of the APU for overall improved gaming performance. It is interesting what $40-50 can accomplish in these low budget builds
Score
8
internetlad
September 26, 2013 9:13:47 PM
Related resources
- why is the system builder marathon 2013 based on mini itx plat form? - Forum
- Looking at System Builder Marathon (or any other PC) for New Build - Forum
- Help! System Builder Marathon, Q2 2014: Our Budget Gaming PC - Forum
- System Builder Marathon, August 2012: $1000 Enthusiast PC - Forum
- With Tom's System Builder Marathon in mind: Build a Infinite Budget PC - Forum
pauldh
September 26, 2013 9:46:08 PM
The promo is now back, so the A10-5800K was (for us) and is once again $110 from Newegg no rebates. We can't match that price too easy with HD7750/7770. Although as rolli said $50 after $30 mail-in rebate + a Pentium gets close (AR).
EDIT: My mistake! Actually this is a different promo. A $20 gift card. When we chose this part, the savings instantly removed $20 from the shopping cart total.
EDIT: My mistake! Actually this is a different promo. A $20 gift card. When we chose this part, the savings instantly removed $20 from the shopping cart total.
Score
0
sicom
September 26, 2013 9:47:45 PM
So a $350 PC has better performance than an Xbox 360, and a $400 PC blows it clear out of the water. Cost of operating system not withstanding. I realize this console generation is nearly ancient history by now, but I still find that interesting, and perhaps because it's not ancient history yet.
Note of reference: BF3 plays at 720p @ 30 FPS at about medium'ish settings on 360/PS3.
Note of reference: BF3 plays at 720p @ 30 FPS at about medium'ish settings on 360/PS3.
Score
3
pauldh
September 26, 2013 10:07:32 PM
slomo4sho said:
Nice choice in parts. However, those wanting to cheat can pickup a 750K with 7770 within $20-30 of the price of the APU for overall improved gaming performance. It is interesting what $40-50 can accomplish in these low budget builds
That must be a pretty big cheat.
But that pairing sure stymies the 6800K's appeal doesn't it. You are so right, $40-50 more does wonders. We could make a fun poor man's marathon out of exploring that alone.$400/450/500 gaming faceoff?
Score
7
aggroboy
September 26, 2013 10:24:08 PM
sicom said:
So a $350 PC has better performance than an Xbox 360, and a $400 PC blows it clear out of the water. Cost of operating system not withstanding. I realize this console generation is nearly ancient history by now, but I still find that interesting, and perhaps because it's not ancient history yet.Note of reference: BF3 plays at 720p @ 30 FPS at about medium'ish settings on 360/PS3.
You're using 2012-2013 components to compare against a 2005 console.
Score
6
itzsnypah
September 26, 2013 10:46:33 PM
750K HD7750 4GB RAM and you have much better computer (overall and gaming) for the same price.
750K vs A10-5800K (CPU wise)
The same (except 750K no graphics to cool)
7750 vs 7660D
512 vs 384 shaders
GDDR5 vs DDR3
800Mhz vs 800Mhz
Did you even consider this or did you go into this budget with your heart set on an APU?
750K vs A10-5800K (CPU wise)
The same (except 750K no graphics to cool)
7750 vs 7660D
512 vs 384 shaders
GDDR5 vs DDR3
800Mhz vs 800Mhz
Did you even consider this or did you go into this budget with your heart set on an APU?
Score
0
pauldh
September 26, 2013 11:50:54 PM
itzsnypah said:
750K HD7750 4GB RAM and you have much better computer (overall and gaming) for the same price.750K vs A10-5800K (CPU wise)
The same (except 750K no graphics to cool)
7750 vs 7660D
512 vs 384 shaders
GDDR5 vs DDR3
800Mhz vs 800Mhz
Did you even consider this or did you go into this budget with your heart set on an APU?
That's an easy answer. The math simply didn't (and still doesn't) add up.
The cheapest 7750 was $85, the 750K was also $85. That's $170 when the 5800K was $110 with a promo code anyone buying one would have used to save instantly before checking out. The goal was $325 factoring that promotional instant savings.
And as mentioned in the text on page one, a 4GB mem kit saved only $10, meaning 750K+7750 was still $50 over, which is huge on a $325 budget.
Although, I knew before order time playing by the rules we'd call this a $350 PC. Hope that all makes sense.
Score
4
The current APU costs $130. And the memory costs $50. Total: $180.
Now if you place an Athlon X4 750K 3,4Ghz for $80 or an Ivybridge Pentium G2120 3,1Ghz $70, using a HD 7770 for $90 and for memory 4GB (2 x 2GB) for $35 it will be total: Intel: $195 ($15 more) and AMD:$205 ($25 more).
Now for $15/$25 you can have double or more performance on games. Why to go with an APU???
edit: I actually read the article and didn't read all the comments.
But even if you choose not to go with 7750, according to Tom's hierrarchy chart the 6670 (even the DDR3 version) is still two tiers faster. And I can't remember even prvious month the 6670DDR3 to cost more than $60 (maybe less with some AR) So a 750K or a G2120 (or a bit lower) will still offer better performance at almost same price (the pentium will be the same price) with 4GB RAM.
Now if you place an Athlon X4 750K 3,4Ghz for $80 or an Ivybridge Pentium G2120 3,1Ghz $70, using a HD 7770 for $90 and for memory 4GB (2 x 2GB) for $35 it will be total: Intel: $195 ($15 more) and AMD:$205 ($25 more).
Now for $15/$25 you can have double or more performance on games. Why to go with an APU???
edit: I actually read the article and didn't read all the comments.
But even if you choose not to go with 7750, according to Tom's hierrarchy chart the 6670 (even the DDR3 version) is still two tiers faster. And I can't remember even prvious month the 6670DDR3 to cost more than $60 (maybe less with some AR) So a 750K or a G2120 (or a bit lower) will still offer better performance at almost same price (the pentium will be the same price) with 4GB RAM.
Score
1
pauldh
September 27, 2013 12:17:28 AM
Memnarchon - read the comment right above yours. The APU fit in budget. None of these other suggestions even came close.
We don't control pricing changes that occur way after ordering parts. BY all means, the story shows a G2120 + HD7750 would deliver twice the fps.
Put it this way. This is similar to us later wondering why you'd chose a certain 750K+7770 configuration today rather than grabbing a Black Friday deal that buys i3+HD 7850 for $10 more. The answer is simple right, that's not the prices/bargains we are dealing with today when trying to place an order.
We don't control pricing changes that occur way after ordering parts. BY all means, the story shows a G2120 + HD7750 would deliver twice the fps.
Put it this way. This is similar to us later wondering why you'd chose a certain 750K+7770 configuration today rather than grabbing a Black Friday deal that buys i3+HD 7850 for $10 more. The answer is simple right, that's not the prices/bargains we are dealing with today when trying to place an order.
Score
3
pauldh
September 27, 2013 12:28:27 AM
@ Memnarchon
no problem.
I don't really like the 6670 GDDR3 when priced so similar to HD 7750 ($15 difference iirc). But had this been a gaming build, yes we'd try to fit in discrete. And G2120+ 7750 would get my vote any day at the same cost as 750K+ 6670. edit: looking at slightly older notes from another story tell me it was $70 for a 6670 and the cheapest 7750 had just dropped to $85 for this story. $100 was more common prior to this and could change daily though. It may have been $60-65 for a 6670 GDDR3 when we ordered this rig.
Anyway... It wasn't a gaming PC, and budget was key! ($325 / $350 less the discount)
BTW, I edited my above comment. I see the current APU promo code is not an instant savings like it was when we picked it out, its now a gift card.
no problem. I don't really like the 6670 GDDR3 when priced so similar to HD 7750 ($15 difference iirc). But had this been a gaming build, yes we'd try to fit in discrete. And G2120+ 7750 would get my vote any day at the same cost as 750K+ 6670. edit: looking at slightly older notes from another story tell me it was $70 for a 6670 and the cheapest 7750 had just dropped to $85 for this story. $100 was more common prior to this and could change daily though. It may have been $60-65 for a 6670 GDDR3 when we ordered this rig.
Anyway... It wasn't a gaming PC, and budget was key! ($325 / $350 less the discount)
BTW, I edited my above comment. I see the current APU promo code is not an instant savings like it was when we picked it out, its now a gift card.
Score
0
pauldh
September 27, 2013 12:42:19 AM
envy14tpe said:
A10-6800k with 1600 RAM?!? Nooooo. gotta get 1866 or 2133, even if only 2x2GB.If you are referring to this build. It was a 5800K, and the ram was tested overclocked to 1866 and 2133 also.
You bring up a good point though. 6800K deserves 2133 MT/s. Depending when you buy the RAM, that has at times been a big price difference. When I last checked Newegg doesn't even sell a 4GB kit above 1866. That cost alone can be put towards a discrete solution instead.
Score
1
ojas
September 27, 2013 1:09:25 AM
Lee Yong Quan
September 27, 2013 1:40:53 AM
pauldh
September 27, 2013 5:25:58 AM
ojas said:
Paul, i'm curious, why the $50 reduction in budget from last time? The other builds had the same price point...(Or was it simply, as you've written, "let's chop the least expensive rig's budget in half and see what happens"?)
That's an interesting question ojas, Basically the short answer is this PC was built in direct response to accumulated reader feedback.
The $400 Spirit of Mini-ITX was so well received we knew there was interest in highly affordable builds. But there were folks less concerned about gaming who felt it deserved an APU. One even said with an APU you could build one for $350.
Admittedly, an APU in an SBM sounds ridiculous at first, as by default our cheapest machines are dubbed gamers. But I've long wanted to build a general purpose machine that's shown steady reader interest going back years. And really, when I thought about it an APU makes perfect sense.
So both of these cheap bonus builds started off with a "how low could we go and still be satisfied with the result" attitude. The $400 budget grew in order to maximize the low-profile graphics possibilities. That tiny gaming PC is no longer attractive with less graphics.
This round we aimed the needs of folks who didn't like big sacrifices in livability just to game. A dual-core, small/slow storage, 4GB RAM, etc. doesn't' cater to everyone's desires. At $109 the 5800K jumped out as a best no compromise bargain to fill the desired need. Intel doesn't have an affordable quad, and the X4 750K loses it's edge when gaming takes a back seat. Also, Richland scared me a bit as budget A55/A75 mobos were just starting to roll out with firmware support. I didn't want a build I'd have to flash just to boot, plus the 6800K done right with high speed RAM was just too costly to scream high-value. We already know how it performs anyway.
Sorry to ramble, I just found this to be such a good question, I wanted to share the thought process behind the build's purpose and budget. It took some tweaking to get there but in the end a $325 build ($350 if we removed discounts) was not only possible, but allowed a highly desirable result outside of serious gaming.
Score
5
pauldh
September 27, 2013 5:37:36 AM
Hmm and jut to add..... It seems gamers may take over these comments and twist this build into a failure at something it was never meant to be. That's fine and all, I don't mind those discussions. But keep in mind this wasn't supposed to improve gaming, it was meant to improve everything else at the lowest price. It is compared to the $400 PC because we have the data on hand and the two together showcase how, when money is tight, you absolutely must build with a purpose in mind. We may very well drop back down to $500 gaming PC's next round, or if not then soon after. I didn't want to totally miss an opportunity to build a cheap entry level (but still capable) machine for those who are less interested in gaming.
Score
5
pauldh
September 27, 2013 5:43:29 AM
internetlad said:
Have to admit, I like where this went. This is a little higher than a similarly priced build I was looking at for my brother in law about a year agoAwesome, glad to hear it. I like where it went also, and it's a result of readers shining a light this type of build deserves attention, and can serve numerous purposes without wasting unnecessary funds on un-needed muscle.
Score
2
Well Paul, you did it; redeemed this SBM cycle.
1. There is just no way around the sad truth that an APU is really not sufficient for demanding modern titles. While my past comments and budget approach should clearly indicate I believe in the concept of "good enough," and do not require anywhere near UltraMaxOhWOW settings, realistically an APU just doesn't cut it; not yet.
2. Nice job of frequently mentioning fitness for purpose, and "bending" the data presentation to support it. The APU does have a place, it just isn't [AA] gaming. It would be fine for Grandma, or for a homework machine also good for kids' games
3. There's got to be a better choice than MSI in the budget segment. While the limitations you encountered may very well protect the board, they also make it a very unsatisfying product. We saw this in your $650 build as well. This is kind of a shame, because I got to review a MSI Z77A GD65 Gaming board, and it is one sweet board.
4. As many scholastic and casual titles as you can pick up at Walmart, Office Depot, or Best Buy, I believe an optical drive must be included in this segment.
1. There is just no way around the sad truth that an APU is really not sufficient for demanding modern titles. While my past comments and budget approach should clearly indicate I believe in the concept of "good enough," and do not require anywhere near UltraMaxOhWOW settings, realistically an APU just doesn't cut it; not yet.
2. Nice job of frequently mentioning fitness for purpose, and "bending" the data presentation to support it. The APU does have a place, it just isn't [AA] gaming. It would be fine for Grandma, or for a homework machine also good for kids' games
3. There's got to be a better choice than MSI in the budget segment. While the limitations you encountered may very well protect the board, they also make it a very unsatisfying product. We saw this in your $650 build as well. This is kind of a shame, because I got to review a MSI Z77A GD65 Gaming board, and it is one sweet board.
4. As many scholastic and casual titles as you can pick up at Walmart, Office Depot, or Best Buy, I believe an optical drive must be included in this segment.
Score
0
ojas
September 27, 2013 7:59:22 AM
@Paul: Thanks for the detailed answer! I had asked because i was wondering about Richland, and had supposed that a similar $400 budget would have allowed you to go with the A10-6800K.
But honestly, was a very interesting comparison, and i think in this budget segment you really have a choice of either/or, between productivity and gaming. Unless of course, you decide to skimp on things like the case, psu, etc.
And hey, for me the main attraction of the SBMs are that they allow real-world combinations of parts and make them interesting. There's always a specific build that "i would build" but it's informative to see other combinations, crazy things and when an editor's build matches your own, how it performs.
As you said, trolls will be trolls, and we're infested with them now, but keep it up! FOR SCIENCE!
But honestly, was a very interesting comparison, and i think in this budget segment you really have a choice of either/or, between productivity and gaming. Unless of course, you decide to skimp on things like the case, psu, etc.
And hey, for me the main attraction of the SBMs are that they allow real-world combinations of parts and make them interesting. There's always a specific build that "i would build" but it's informative to see other combinations, crazy things and when an editor's build matches your own, how it performs.
As you said, trolls will be trolls, and we're infested with them now, but keep it up! FOR SCIENCE!
Score
1
jabliese
September 27, 2013 8:11:25 AM
noobzilla771
September 27, 2013 8:23:30 AM
I did a review on the A10-6800k as a budget computer.
http://northamericaninfluencer.amd.com/Post/amdtestdriv...
In summary, I would still recommend entry-level Intel cpu and a dedicated graphics.
http://northamericaninfluencer.amd.com/Post/amdtestdriv...
In summary, I would still recommend entry-level Intel cpu and a dedicated graphics.
Score
-1
wmcla45
September 27, 2013 8:48:28 AM
cknobman
September 27, 2013 9:03:23 AM
pauldh said:
You are so right, $40-50 more does wonders. We could make a fun poor man's marathon out of exploring that alone.$400/450/500 gaming faceoff?
Yes, please! Would love to see that. A $50 bump in the budget segment is akin to $200 extra in the mid-range. As you showed here, going just $25 over budget gave you ( I think ) 50% better parts. That would be very revealing I think.
Onus said:
Well Paul, you did it; redeemed this SBM cycle.1. There is just no way around the sad truth that an APU is really not sufficient for demanding modern titles. While my past comments and budget approach should clearly indicate I believe in the concept of "good enough," and do not require anywhere near UltraMaxOhWOW settings, realistically an APU just doesn't cut it; not yet.
2. Nice job of frequently mentioning fitness for purpose, and "bending" the data presentation to support it. The APU does have a place, it just isn't [AA] gaming. It would be fine for Grandma, or for a homework machine also good for kids' games
3. There's got to be a better choice than MSI in the budget segment. While the limitations you encountered may very well protect the board, they also make it a very unsatisfying product. We saw this in your $650 build as well. This is kind of a shame, because I got to review a MSI Z77A GD65 Gaming board, and it is one sweet board.
4. As many scholastic and casual titles as you can pick up at Walmart, Office Depot, or Best Buy, I believe an optical drive must be included in this segment.
Especially agree on 1, 2, and 4. APUs are superp for casual gaming and office PCs, but not much more. And while ultra detail settings are nice, even medium-high in today's games look fantastic at 1080p. And call me old or old-fashioned, but I still think an optical drive is required.
Final note, I am surprised by the case. That's a dang good product for only $20.
Score
2
loops
September 27, 2013 10:24:56 AM
An enjoyable article, though it's a shame about the overclocking! I've read a lot about others managed to get their integrated graphics to 1050, safely, with the stock cooling solution. I managed to do it myself, although I couldn't go much higher even with an aftermarket cooling solution.
That said, I have a computer build that is quite similar to this. Late last year, my significant other's laptop took a tumble, and didn't live to see another day. In a way, it was kind of a blessing, because it was powered by an old, stalwart Athlon 64 TF-20. When looking for a replacement, she said she would rather have a desktop anyway, and the current rig is the end product. It's more than good enough for all her needs, even when she decides to do a bit of gaming (Tomb Raider and Bioshock Infinity). I've recently acquired a second-hand GTX 460 (for $50!) which I installed to get better graphical performance. (It wasn't *needed* buuuuuut, let's face it, those are both games that look fantastic and it's nice to be able to enjoy those higher end graphics to their full potential.)
I look forward to any other articles with low-budget builds, especially if someone is brave enough to slap on an aftermarket cooling solution to see how far that will take them.
That said, I have a computer build that is quite similar to this. Late last year, my significant other's laptop took a tumble, and didn't live to see another day. In a way, it was kind of a blessing, because it was powered by an old, stalwart Athlon 64 TF-20. When looking for a replacement, she said she would rather have a desktop anyway, and the current rig is the end product. It's more than good enough for all her needs, even when she decides to do a bit of gaming (Tomb Raider and Bioshock Infinity). I've recently acquired a second-hand GTX 460 (for $50!) which I installed to get better graphical performance. (It wasn't *needed* buuuuuut, let's face it, those are both games that look fantastic and it's nice to be able to enjoy those higher end graphics to their full potential.)
I look forward to any other articles with low-budget builds, especially if someone is brave enough to slap on an aftermarket cooling solution to see how far that will take them.
Score
1
JohnMD1022
September 27, 2013 11:56:18 AM
spidey9006
September 27, 2013 12:12:08 PM
Well spidey, remember the rules of the SBM; they're Newegg-sponsored, so that's where they get all of the parts.
As to your two choices, I'm really not a fan of either one. First, if you're planning a discrete GPU from the outset, an APU is not the way to go. Second, the FX-4130 is a Bulldozer chip, which was a hot disappointment all around. Furthermore, any free (i.e. cheap) motherboard with it will likely be incapable of safely overclocking it anywhere near enough to unleash what potential it has.
As to your two choices, I'm really not a fan of either one. First, if you're planning a discrete GPU from the outset, an APU is not the way to go. Second, the FX-4130 is a Bulldozer chip, which was a hot disappointment all around. Furthermore, any free (i.e. cheap) motherboard with it will likely be incapable of safely overclocking it anywhere near enough to unleash what potential it has.
Score
0
Gulli
September 27, 2013 12:19:39 PM
loops said:
@ Pauldh: Please respond Would you share your thoughts about how a build like this would work as a "steam box"?
Would this be a "good" or "better" Steam Box in you opinion?
Can you get Steam OS on it and let us know how it works?
I am very hungry for some answers about this topic. Please.
The answer is simple, if you plan to use it for games you need a dedicated video card or you will be disappointed.
If you just plan to use it to stream games from another machine that actually plays them, depending on the performance of that setup this should do fine since this machine doesn't really do any of the work in that case.
Score
0
egowhip69
September 27, 2013 12:43:55 PM
This was a great article... while most of us DO go for the higher end stuff, we often are asked to help or build systems for people that don't need anywhere near the horsepower we want in our systems.
This highlights a great build for parents, grandparents, younger kids, and even starving students.
I do wish, that as a bonus, you grabbed a ~$75-100 discrete card and threw it in there for comparison.
Reason I say that, is maybe that college kid only had the cash for the base system, but Christmas is around the corner... What would the bonus be from asking mom and dad to buy them a 7770 or even a 6570 and dropping it in there?
This highlights a great build for parents, grandparents, younger kids, and even starving students.
I do wish, that as a bonus, you grabbed a ~$75-100 discrete card and threw it in there for comparison.
Reason I say that, is maybe that college kid only had the cash for the base system, but Christmas is around the corner... What would the bonus be from asking mom and dad to buy them a 7770 or even a 6570 and dropping it in there?
Score
0
Gulli said:
Yeah, the 5800K is a must have for a system like this but I would have gone for 4GB of faster RAM because you don't really need 8GB on a system like this and the 5800K's graphics chip works better with fast RAM (1866 and above).4 gigs of ram is not enough and will cripple the apu in games
Score
0
So you bought it, good for you. The msi bios is not half bad is it ? At least it will allow you to turn turbo-core off and on, unlike the gigabyte ud4 you had.
the faster memory would have helped a little but 1600 OC is ok my pair of 1333 runs 1.5v cas 7
Your 1.288v core is very good @4.0 very close to the numbers i showed you on the misi a55 103 x39
http://imageshack.us/a/img407/7838/8x23.jpg
the faster memory would have helped a little but 1600 OC is ok my pair of 1333 runs 1.5v cas 7
Your 1.288v core is very good @4.0 very close to the numbers i showed you on the misi a55 103 x39
http://imageshack.us/a/img407/7838/8x23.jpg
Score
0
JohnMD1022 said:
If you happen to have a MicroCenter nearby, the Corsair CXM Series 430W PSU is only 34.99 after MIR.Modular beauty.
<grin>
given the choice i would stay with the antec 450 it has some freakish good parts in it even if it does not have active pfc.
But it does have two voltage controllers for each 12v rail for ovp/uvp protection. IIRC cx430 has one for both 12v rails.
Score
0
flyflinger
September 27, 2013 3:31:58 PM
My super duper cheap system I threw together about 10 month ago for kids that's been working quite well....
Athlon X3 450 CPU.......... $59
MSI 880G mobo............... $29 (after rebate)
Crucial 4 GB RAM........... $21 (after promo code)
Rosewill mico ATX case... $18 (after rebate)
Corsair CX 430w PSU...... $19 (after rebate)
HDD Toshiba 320 GB 2.5"... Free (came out of laptop after SSD replacement)
Graphics GTX 650............ $59 (after rebate)
TOTAL COST....................$205
Netflix, homework, FB, online games.... it's been working just fine. I love these cheap builds when they exceed their expectations.
Athlon X3 450 CPU.......... $59
MSI 880G mobo............... $29 (after rebate)
Crucial 4 GB RAM........... $21 (after promo code)
Rosewill mico ATX case... $18 (after rebate)
Corsair CX 430w PSU...... $19 (after rebate)
HDD Toshiba 320 GB 2.5"... Free (came out of laptop after SSD replacement)
Graphics GTX 650............ $59 (after rebate)
TOTAL COST....................$205
Netflix, homework, FB, online games.... it's been working just fine. I love these cheap builds when they exceed their expectations.
Score
1
Narcissistic_Martyr
September 27, 2013 4:55:36 PM
spidey9006
September 27, 2013 5:48:00 PM
spidey9006
September 27, 2013 5:56:10 PM
Totally didn't mean to post the same comment 3 times.
Onus, Wouldn't the potential from the 7850 outweigh any gaming performance that you could get from overclocking a weaker CPU and GPU? I figure that the A6 + mobo is the cheapest CPU with motherboard that I could possibly find, so it would give me the most cash for a better GPU.
Onus, Wouldn't the potential from the 7850 outweigh any gaming performance that you could get from overclocking a weaker CPU and GPU? I figure that the A6 + mobo is the cheapest CPU with motherboard that I could possibly find, so it would give me the most cash for a better GPU.
Score
0
Well, as Paul said, this was not strictly a gamer. I don't think weakening the CPU any further is a great idea for a general purpose build. If you are building a gamer, I don't think you'd start with an APU. I'd probably get a G860 in order to get that HD7850, planning to upgrade it to an i3 or i5 as needed.
Score
0
abitoms
September 27, 2013 8:24:09 PM
Paul, thanks a lot of bringing in this entry level PC. Glad you covered that section. May I suggest a couple things I would have liked to see?
A 6600k instead of the 5800k and a 500GB HDD instead of the 1TB one miht have spared cash for a 7750 GPU at the cost of bringing the cost upto $400, same as last quarter's. And this probably would have blown/beaten the last quarter's $400PC.
The 6600k has similar clockspeed to the 5800k and I figure 500GB would be (very) good enough for this budget.
Again, appreciate you covering this budget level. Keep them coming.
A 6600k instead of the 5800k and a 500GB HDD instead of the 1TB one miht have spared cash for a 7750 GPU at the cost of bringing the cost upto $400, same as last quarter's. And this probably would have blown/beaten the last quarter's $400PC.
The 6600k has similar clockspeed to the 5800k and I figure 500GB would be (very) good enough for this budget.
Again, appreciate you covering this budget level. Keep them coming.
Score
0
pauldh
September 28, 2013 8:49:35 AM
abitoms said:
Paul, thanks a lot of bringing in this entry level PC. Glad you covered that section. May I suggest a couple things I would have liked to see?A 6600k instead of the 5800k and a 500GB HDD instead of the 1TB one miht have spared cash for a 7750 GPU at the cost of bringing the cost upto $400, same as last quarter's. And this probably would have blown/beaten the last quarter's $400PC.
The 6600k has similar clockspeed to the 5800k and I figure 500GB would be (very) good enough for this budget.
Again, appreciate you covering this budget level. Keep them coming.
1)It was borderline timing, and I didn't trust Richland support out of the box (without BIOS flash) back when we ordered these parts. Plus the 5800K was $109 instantly, just by entering a promo code, so it represented good value. I hoped by now it would have dropped in price from $130 too.
2) A 500GB is more in line at this budget. But occasionally you find better bargains, like we did. This 1TB drive cost $2 more than the cheapest 250GB drives, and $3 less than the cheapest 500GB drive. So we saved money to double storage.
Score
0
- 1 / 2
- 2
- Newest
Related resources
- System Builder Marathon, May '09: $1,300 Enthusiast PC Forum
- System Builder Marathon: Sub-$4000 PC Forum
- More resources
!