Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

A debate on Intel or AMD, and Nvidia or ATI, SLI or Crossfire who do you like better and why.

Tags:
  • Gaming
  • Intel
  • CPUs
  • AMD
  • Crossfire
  • Motherboards
  • Nvidia
  • New Build
  • Components
  • ATI
  • Graphics Cards
  • Socket
Last response: in Components
Share

which do you like more Intel or AMD, and Nvidia or ATI

Total: 2 votes

  • Intel
  • 0 %
  • Nvidia
  • 0 %
  • AMD
  • 50 %
  • ATI
  • 25 %
  • SLI
  • 0 %
  • Crossfire
  • 25 %
October 17, 2013 1:00:41 AM

A debate on Intel or AMD, and Nvidia or ATI, and SLI or Crossfire who do you like better and why?

1. Why do you think Intel changes there socket on there motherboards so often, and AMD seems to stick with the same socket for years?

2. Why do you think Intel charges so much money for there products and is it worth, does more money equal more value always?

3. Why do you think AMD makes a product with low enough price tag that anyone can afford to build a nice gaming rig for them selves?

4. Why do you think Nvidia charges so much for there products and are they worth it?

5. Why do Intel and Nvidia keep driving up the price ceiling of the products each year and are they worth over a $1000.00+,?

6. Why do you think ATI makes a video card low enough priced compared to Nvidia that anyone can afford to build a nice gaming rig for them selves?

Thank You for Your Time and Thoughts.

More about : debate intel amd nvidia ati sli crossfire

a c 305 4 Gaming
a c 118 å Intel
a c 506 à CPUs
a c 145 À AMD
a c 109 V Motherboard
October 17, 2013 1:54:04 AM

1. It's not always what it seems. AMD's fm1 socket lasted for just one generation. Intel generally makes advances in architecture at a faster rate than AMD and that leads to more socket changes.

2. Intel can charge more for some of their products because AMD is not competitive enough at every level. Particularly on the high end. Intel's products offer considerably better IPC(single thread performance) and much better performance/power ratio = superior efficiency.

3. Budget/low-end gaming is what AMD is most competitive at right now with their APUs.

4. Sometimes Nvidia is worth the extra cost, sometimes it's not. AMD is more competitive with their graphics than they are with their cpus.

5. Same as above. AMD needs to apply more pressure to intel to keep prices competitive. Nvidia still has superior drivers, and people are willing to pay a small premium for stability.

6. You seriously sound like you are an AMD rep.

Hope I helped.
!