I have a few quick questions. Essentially, over the past few weeks as various price cuts and developments in the GPU market have occurred, I've narrowed down my search for a new GPU to a few different choices.
On a 1080p monitor, is there a significant benefit to getting a card with 4gb of VRAM over 3gb? I'm wondering if there's any future proofing benefit to going for the extra gb of VRAM if I plan to just do a single 1080p monitor (I have two monitors, but don't plan on getting a third so I don't think it'd make sense to play most games on just two monitors)
My next question relates to the 290. At a $400 price point, it's not very far from the 770s and 280x models I'm also considering. Is it worth waiting until December for the 3rd party versions of the 290 that are supposed to fix the card's noise issues and inconsistencies? From the benchmarks I've seen on this site's review of the card, the 290 gives anywhere from 8-20 more FPS than the 280x and 770. I'm just unsure if the difference is worth the wait/extra money compared to the other cards so if anyone has opinions I'd appreciate it.
Last question operates on the condition that I wouldn't get a 290; at that point I'd decide between a 4gb 770 and a 280x. For the 770, I'm finding two different versions of the EVGA 770, "superclocked" and "classified", along with a cheaper Gigabyte Windforce version. If I were to get a 280x, I was thinking I'd go with one of the cheaper Asus models (the Matrix seems unstable and is out of stock everywhere) or the Sapphire Vapor-X model (Toxic is out of stock everywhere)
Anyone have opinion on choosing between these cards/suggestions?
On a 1080p monitor, is there a significant benefit to getting a card with 4gb of VRAM over 3gb? I'm wondering if there's any future proofing benefit to going for the extra gb of VRAM if I plan to just do a single 1080p monitor (I have two monitors, but don't plan on getting a third so I don't think it'd make sense to play most games on just two monitors)
My next question relates to the 290. At a $400 price point, it's not very far from the 770s and 280x models I'm also considering. Is it worth waiting until December for the 3rd party versions of the 290 that are supposed to fix the card's noise issues and inconsistencies? From the benchmarks I've seen on this site's review of the card, the 290 gives anywhere from 8-20 more FPS than the 280x and 770. I'm just unsure if the difference is worth the wait/extra money compared to the other cards so if anyone has opinions I'd appreciate it.
Last question operates on the condition that I wouldn't get a 290; at that point I'd decide between a 4gb 770 and a 280x. For the 770, I'm finding two different versions of the EVGA 770, "superclocked" and "classified", along with a cheaper Gigabyte Windforce version. If I were to get a 280x, I was thinking I'd go with one of the cheaper Asus models (the Matrix seems unstable and is out of stock everywhere) or the Sapphire Vapor-X model (Toxic is out of stock everywhere)
Anyone have opinion on choosing between these cards/suggestions?