3DMark Firestrike 2013 Benchmark Thread - Post your scores! - Page 3
Tags:
- Benchmark
- Speed
-
Graphics
Last response: in Graphics & Displays
lostmenoggin
December 16, 2013 6:54:12 PM
stickg1 said:
Oh wow, those are some nice runs!I think I could break 10k easily. Still new to OCing and figuring it out. GPU OC only. Still not sure about doing the CPU yet. Using Afterburner and normal BIOS I had the settings like this..
Power Limit 109%
Core Clock +150
Stable. Once I get more comfortable I'll switch it to the LN2 setting.
-
Reply to lostmenoggin
stickg1
December 18, 2013 2:43:49 PM
New AMD drivers! It looks like my power limit slider is finally fixed, no more black screens when I try to use it!
AMD 13.12 WHQL
Here is a 3DMark run at 1125/1550
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1884462
I was able to run 1150/1550 without crashing but in GPU test #2 I saw some very slight artifacting so I need to dial back some.
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1884494
AMD 13.12 WHQL
Here is a 3DMark run at 1125/1550
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1884462
I was able to run 1150/1550 without crashing but in GPU test #2 I saw some very slight artifacting so I need to dial back some.
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1884494
-
Reply to stickg1
oOSlushyOo
December 18, 2013 4:05:06 PM
stickg1 said:
New AMD drivers! It looks like my power limit slider is finally fixed, no more black screens when I try to use it!AMD 13.12 WHQL
Here is a 3DMark run at 1125/1550
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1884462
I was able to run 1150/1550 without crashing but in GPU test #2 I saw some very slight artifacting so I need to dial back some.
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1884494
Nicely done! How do you like the card? Do you use a reference cooler or aftermarket?
-
Reply to oOSlushyOo
Related resources
- 3DMark 11/Vantage Scores thread! (Benchmark Thread #3) - Forum
- My GTX 780 3DMark FireStrike score is low? - Tech Support
- 3Dmark Firestrike Extreme Thread - Tech Support
- HD6XXX series 3dMark scores (WORKING THREAD) - Forum
- how come my 3dmark 11 benchmark score is lower with my i7 4790k @ 4.7ghz then it was with my i7 4770k @ 4.3ghz ? - Tech Support
stickg1
December 18, 2013 4:31:28 PM
smeezekitty
December 18, 2013 4:57:15 PM
stickg1
December 18, 2013 5:37:36 PM
oOSlushyOo
December 18, 2013 8:44:55 PM
stickg1 said:
smeezekitty said:
A spot fan may not be sufficient to cool the VRMs because they do not have all that much surface area.That's what I thought, but the spot fan does a much better than the stock cooler. Stock cooler I would get into the 80's, now I'm in the mid 60's on the VRMs.
You considering an aftermarket cooler once some reviews are done? Pretty nice job getting the GPU setup in such a fashion...I am not that brave (pretty new to building).
For Pics Sake:
http://forum.corsair.com/v3/attachment.php?attachmentid...
-
Reply to oOSlushyOo
stickg1
December 19, 2013 4:11:18 AM
RussK1
December 19, 2013 4:53:38 AM
oOSlushyOo said:
stickg1 said:
smeezekitty said:
A spot fan may not be sufficient to cool the VRMs because they do not have all that much surface area.That's what I thought, but the spot fan does a much better than the stock cooler. Stock cooler I would get into the 80's, now I'm in the mid 60's on the VRMs.
You considering an aftermarket cooler once some reviews are done? Pretty nice job getting the GPU setup in such a fashion...I am not that brave (pretty new to building).
For Pics Sake:
http://forum.corsair.com/v3/attachment.php?attachmentid...
The Deluxe is the nicest thing there. It has everything! I'm jealous.
-
Reply to RussK1
4Ryan6
December 19, 2013 5:37:27 PM
oOSlushyOo
December 19, 2013 7:53:52 PM
RussK1 said:
oOSlushyOo said:
stickg1 said:
smeezekitty said:
A spot fan may not be sufficient to cool the VRMs because they do not have all that much surface area.That's what I thought, but the spot fan does a much better than the stock cooler. Stock cooler I would get into the 80's, now I'm in the mid 60's on the VRMs.
You considering an aftermarket cooler once some reviews are done? Pretty nice job getting the GPU setup in such a fashion...I am not that brave (pretty new to building).
For Pics Sake:
http://forum.corsair.com/v3/attachment.php?attachmentid...
The Deluxe is the nicest thing there. It has everything! I'm jealous.
Yeah the board has been great! Can't underestimate the cards either....latest scores with some mild 5% OCing and a 0.1Ghz jump on the CPU puts me just past the 10K mark!!!!:
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1893344
Clean run and temps were still nice.
-
Reply to oOSlushyOo
RussK1
December 20, 2013 5:19:48 AM
oOSlushyOo said:
RussK1 said:
oOSlushyOo said:
stickg1 said:
smeezekitty said:
A spot fan may not be sufficient to cool the VRMs because they do not have all that much surface area.That's what I thought, but the spot fan does a much better than the stock cooler. Stock cooler I would get into the 80's, now I'm in the mid 60's on the VRMs.
You considering an aftermarket cooler once some reviews are done? Pretty nice job getting the GPU setup in such a fashion...I am not that brave (pretty new to building).
For Pics Sake:
http://forum.corsair.com/v3/attachment.php?attachmentid...
The Deluxe is the nicest thing there. It has everything! I'm jealous.
Yeah the board has been great! Can't underestimate the cards either....latest scores with some mild 5% OCing and a 0.1Ghz jump on the CPU puts me just past the 10K mark!!!!:
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1893344
Clean run and temps were still nice.
Not everyone has a deluxe. That was a good choice and the one I'll be making once Broadwell hits the market. Hopefully by then boards will offer mSATA 802.11AC 3x3 transmit/receive and not 2x2.
Anyway back on topic, good scores!
-
Reply to RussK1
oOSlushyOo
December 20, 2013 6:42:36 AM
-
Reply to oOSlushyOo
RussK1
December 20, 2013 8:53:54 AM
There's no bottleneck. You're right where you should be... just means the 4770K is a good processor.
Compare with my late 3770K and 680 SLi:
http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/1329453/fs/211844
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/211844
Compare with my late 3770K and 680 SLi:
http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/1329453/fs/211844
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/211844
-
Reply to RussK1
oOSlushyOo
December 20, 2013 3:45:29 PM
I don't want to post too much on this thread, but here are my best and likely final numbers with my current build. I pushed it a bit further, but noticed some artifacts and the program crashed in the combined test. I backed it down a tad and got a clean run...here it is: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1899801
-
Reply to oOSlushyOo
giantbucket
December 21, 2013 4:25:04 PM
ok, I got my newbie-gamer machine set up and tested, so I've got some numbers.
system is i3-4130 / 8G ram / GTX760 / 1080p, all stock, Win8.1x64, latest drivers as of Dec.21/2013
eh, it's not bad. kinda glad I returned the 650Ti Boost SC and got the 760 OC instead.
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1908547
system is i3-4130 / 8G ram / GTX760 / 1080p, all stock, Win8.1x64, latest drivers as of Dec.21/2013
eh, it's not bad. kinda glad I returned the 650Ti Boost SC and got the 760 OC instead.
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1908547
-
Reply to giantbucket
4Ryan6
December 22, 2013 3:46:05 AM
stickg1
December 22, 2013 5:53:28 AM
4Ryan6 said:
Just wanted to pass on that STEAM is running a flash holiday sale and 3DMark is presently $2.49, so for any of you running the basic edition you cannot beat that price, it is a flash sale so it's time limited, better hurry! Good eye Ry.
My Z77 MPower came with a copy, but it is nice to have the full version. You don't have to watch the demos or run all three tests, you can pick and choose.
-
Reply to stickg1
4Ryan6
December 23, 2013 1:54:05 AM
Sorry for this off topic post.
STEAM also dropped the game price of Serious Sam 3 BFE from $39.99 to $9.99 during the holiday sale, and SS3 is a really fun game to play and probably the best game release of the entire Serious Sam series, the graphics are great and the game physx as well, it's no wonder it took a holiday sale to get the price dropped.
STEAM also dropped the game price of Serious Sam 3 BFE from $39.99 to $9.99 during the holiday sale, and SS3 is a really fun game to play and probably the best game release of the entire Serious Sam series, the graphics are great and the game physx as well, it's no wonder it took a holiday sale to get the price dropped.
-
Reply to 4Ryan6
Mohamad Farran
December 23, 2013 10:57:44 PM
jaghpanther
December 23, 2013 11:48:25 PM
Hmmm...score went down about 200 from the last time I ran this.
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/7710315
Ok left adative v-sync on global. Turned that off
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2017706
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/7722377
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/7710315
Ok left adative v-sync on global. Turned that off
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2017706
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/7722377
-
Reply to jaghpanther
jimthenagual
December 25, 2013 7:40:18 PM
[ jimthenagual ] - [ i5-4670K @ 4.4GHz ] - [Gigabyte GTX 770 x 2 SLI @ stock ] - [ 11103 ]
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2011217
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2011217
-
Reply to jimthenagual
stickg1
December 27, 2013 5:25:22 PM
Looks like 3DMark has finally accepted my drivers. Also with my waterblock installed I was able to get a better overclock.
R9 290 @ 1150/1500 - 12039
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2032574
-
Reply to stickg1
4Ryan6
December 27, 2013 11:31:44 PM
EllisDemonSlayer
December 31, 2013 12:06:36 AM
rolandzhang3 said:
smeezekitty said:
Stand aside for a record low:[smeezekitty] - [Core 2 Duo E6700 @ 2.66] - [Radeon 6670 @ 800 / 667] - [614]
http://postimg.org/image/8uznsw8yd/
On a side note, since 3dmark is installed on a USB 2.0 hdd, it took a whopping 30 minutes(!) for the firestrike test to load
High five for below a 1000 score
the sad part is if i ran this on my mac yours would be a lot better
Mac Specs:
dual core i5 @ 2.66GHz
4gb 1066MHz
256mbs-64bits VRAM
mobo bus speed 1.3GHz
oh did mention that it is also made in early 2009 and it was top of the line back then; i want it to die but it wont its a mac after all it will last until it meets mister sledge hammer which will be soon
-
Reply to EllisDemonSlayer
smeezekitty
December 31, 2013 12:52:01 AM
Quote:
the sad part is if i ran this on my mac yours would be a lot better
Mac Specs:
dual core i5 @ 2.66GHz
4gb 1066MHz
256mbs-64bits VRAM
mobo bus speed 1.3GHz
Well its mainly about the video card
Chances are yours has less shaders and my 6670 has a 128 bit bus and 1 GB RAM (and firestrike still fills the VRAM)
Quote:
i want it to die but it wont its a mac after all it will last until it meets mister sledge hammer which will be soonGeez dude have you ever heard of keeping it as a backup? We live in a society that is far too wasteful
-
Reply to smeezekitty
rolandzhang3
December 31, 2013 12:55:24 AM
^I agree with the backup system statement, install a linux distribution and play around with it a bit or use it as a folding rig to contribute to something at least
Also considering that i5 he has is probably the i5-750 which is still quite good if you overclock it a fair amount, add a decent GPU and/or PSU to that mac and you should have no problem gaming or getting decent results in Firestrike as well
Also considering that i5 he has is probably the i5-750 which is still quite good if you overclock it a fair amount, add a decent GPU and/or PSU to that mac and you should have no problem gaming or getting decent results in Firestrike as well
-
Reply to rolandzhang3
EllisDemonSlayer
December 31, 2013 9:01:35 AM
i probably will keep the mac but it will definitely not going to be used, im just going to build a gaming computer and the bus is 64-bits, oh and the graphics is gddr2 heres a link to it: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168...
-
Reply to EllisDemonSlayer
smeezekitty
December 31, 2013 1:58:56 PM
EllisDemonSlayer
December 31, 2013 2:20:18 PM
rolandzhang3
December 31, 2013 4:22:36 PM
stickg1
December 31, 2013 7:31:13 PM
Nefos
January 2, 2014 5:46:48 AM
Powerbolt
January 3, 2014 4:06:42 PM
[Powerbolt] - [i7 4770K @ 4.0GHz] - [EVGA GTX 780 @ 1037MHz / 1802MHz] - [9803] -> http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2100330
Spent the last few hours tweaking the overclock. Can't seem to get a stable OC at a base clock modifier of over +70. So the final modifiers were +70 to the base clock, and +600 to the memory clock. Not too shabby I suppose.
Spent the last few hours tweaking the overclock. Can't seem to get a stable OC at a base clock modifier of over +70. So the final modifiers were +70 to the base clock, and +600 to the memory clock. Not too shabby I suppose.
-
Reply to Powerbolt
ikanos
January 8, 2014 6:23:17 AM
[ikanos] - [i5 3570k @ 3.4GHz] [Zotac GTX 780 863 MHz / 1,502 MHz] [9245]
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2142539
graphic score seems low compared to other 780's
..any help guys??
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2142539
graphic score seems low compared to other 780's
..any help guys?? -
Reply to ikanos
RussK1
January 8, 2014 6:44:31 AM
ikanos said:
[ikanos] - [i5 3570k @ 3.4GHz] [Zotac GTX 780 863 MHz / 1,502 MHz] [9245]http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2142539
graphic score seems low compared to other 780's
..any help guys??Drivers.
Try out 320.49 WHQL and I bet your score will be better.
http://www.nvidia.com/object/win8-win7-winvista-64bit-3...
Compared:
http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/634985/fs/1496513
-
Reply to RussK1
ikanos
January 8, 2014 8:57:36 AM
RussK1 said:
ikanos said:
[ikanos] - [i5 3570k @ 3.4GHz] [Zotac GTX 780 863 MHz / 1,502 MHz] [9245]http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2142539
graphic score seems low compared to other 780's
..any help guys??Drivers.
Try out 320.49 WHQL and I bet your score will be better.
http://www.nvidia.com/object/win8-win7-winvista-64bit-3...
Compared:
http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/634985/fs/1496513
thanks for replying so fast man...reverted to 320.49.. here are the results http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2143502 Not much of a difference...a few points low actually than the previous one!!
This is bugging me now
-
Reply to ikanos
RussK1
January 8, 2014 9:16:46 AM
oOSlushyOo
January 8, 2014 12:52:32 PM
RussK1
January 8, 2014 1:57:43 PM
oOSlushyOo said:
If you were to overclock that 780, you would see a pretty substantial performance boost. Since it's a base-clock model, you have a great deal of room to tweak it up.I agree 100%. I'd jump the core up to 1150 and memory up to 7010 (1752) w/stock voltage and jump in and test.
He should check his ASIC...
Hey is this your BF3 name ----> oOsUKIE4plOo
-
Reply to RussK1
oOSlushyOo
January 8, 2014 11:27:31 PM
RussK1 said:
oOSlushyOo said:
If you were to overclock that 780, you would see a pretty substantial performance boost. Since it's a base-clock model, you have a great deal of room to tweak it up.I agree 100%. I'd jump the core up to 1150 and memory up to 7010 (1752) w/stock voltage and jump in and test.
He should check his ASIC...
Hey is this your BF3 name ----> oOsUKIE4plOo
Nope, but then again I am relatively new to computers. I was a console guy for the longest time (to long honestly). My BF3 tag for xbox360 was oOSlushyFeverOo....if i remember correctly. On BF4 via computer now, but have a huge learning curve to go through.
-
Reply to oOSlushyOo
oOSlushyOo
January 8, 2014 11:34:09 PM
Totally forgot to mention this:
Download EVGA's Precision X. I have found it to be the easiest tool to use while overclocking. You can find it here:
http://www.evga.com/precision/
If you need help using the tool, post here. I have used it countless times now to get 10K runs on SLI 760's. I am sure others would help you as well!
NOTE: For starters on you 780, push Power Target to 105%, push GPU Clock Offset to +100, push Mem. Clock Offset to +125- +150. This should be a decent AND safe starting point for your 780.
Download EVGA's Precision X. I have found it to be the easiest tool to use while overclocking. You can find it here:
http://www.evga.com/precision/
If you need help using the tool, post here. I have used it countless times now to get 10K runs on SLI 760's. I am sure others would help you as well!
NOTE: For starters on you 780, push Power Target to 105%, push GPU Clock Offset to +100, push Mem. Clock Offset to +125- +150. This should be a decent AND safe starting point for your 780.
-
Reply to oOSlushyOo
RussK1
January 9, 2014 6:23:55 AM
oOSlushyOo said:
RussK1 said:
oOSlushyOo said:
If you were to overclock that 780, you would see a pretty substantial performance boost. Since it's a base-clock model, you have a great deal of room to tweak it up.I agree 100%. I'd jump the core up to 1150 and memory up to 7010 (1752) w/stock voltage and jump in and test.
He should check his ASIC...
Hey is this your BF3 name ----> oOsUKIE4plOo
Nope, but then again I am relatively new to computers. I was a console guy for the longest time (to long honestly). My BF3 tag for xbox360 was oOSlushyFeverOo....if i remember correctly. On BF4 via computer now, but have a huge learning curve to go through.
Alright no prob... was just playing some Canals yesterday with the guy. Just seen the name and was curious.
-
Reply to RussK1
trev2012
January 15, 2014 12:23:48 AM
[ trev2012 ] - [ AMD FX-8350 @ 4.6GHz ] - [ ASUS GTX 660TI @ 1046 / 1502 ] - [10783]
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/1239631
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/1239631
-
Reply to trev2012
stickg1
January 15, 2014 4:31:17 AM
Powerbolt
January 17, 2014 12:49:51 AM
Started playing around with the GTX 780, and Precision X again, and rounded up just under 100 points from my last benchmark. So close to 10k!
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2228747
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2228747
-
Reply to Powerbolt
dooky1973
January 20, 2014 1:26:18 PM
-
Reply to dooky1973
Noshiz
January 21, 2014 7:58:39 AM
[Noshiz] - [ i5-3570k @ 3.8Ghz] - [Asus Direct CU II GTX 660 @ 980 - 1502] - [4419]
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2266117
I was hoping for a bit higher score but gtx 660 is getting old, next week (hopefully) ill have a new gtx 780 in my hands and i'll test again (lets see if i'll manage to get at least 9k).
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2266117
I was hoping for a bit higher score but gtx 660 is getting old, next week (hopefully) ill have a new gtx 780 in my hands and i'll test again (lets see if i'll manage to get at least 9k).
-
Reply to Noshiz
- 1
- 2
- 3 / 4
- 4
- Newest
Related resources
- Post your 3dmark scores - upgrade recommendations? Forum
- 3dmark '03 FX5900 Ultra - please post your 3dmark scores h.. Forum
- New Multi-Threaded Awesome Benchmark Test. Please try it and tell me your processor model and scores solution
- New intel 6-core 3dmark benchmark posted Forum
- Please POST Overclocking/ Furmark Scores (Benchmarking, Gaming- Performance) solution
- More resources
Read discussions in other Graphics & Displays categories
!

