fx-8350>intel i5/i7 get over it

Status
Not open for further replies.

Romenfousek

Honorable
Dec 21, 2013
153
0
10,690
The amd fx-8350 is betterer when overclocked than intel core i5 or i7 they are insane overpriced and overrated that's why I maked why topic to discuss with you why is it better than your fanboy intel.
It have more cores = more cores = more better
It have less price = less price = more cash to spend on gpu
it have better overclock potentional = more clock potential = more overclocked = more overclocked = more performance = more performance = good price per performance = good price per performance = better then intel = better then intel = best at market = best at market = buy it
 

ZeroRequiem

Honorable
Feb 1, 2014
653
0
11,160


Not sure if trolling or just simply stupid.
By the way OP check this out: http://www.learn-english-online.org/
You're welcome!
 

RobCrezz

Expert
Ambassador
3254982-4173396489-50550.jpg
 

Romenfousek

Honorable
Dec 21, 2013
153
0
10,690


1 versus me 1 noob Amd is better in new games then i5 cuz it has 4 cores and that is not future proof at all
 

RobCrezz

Expert
Ambassador


:lol:
 

Romenfousek

Honorable
Dec 21, 2013
153
0
10,690

My english may be bad. but my point is right bro. Tell me what has intel better ? Single core performance ? Power consumption ? What else ?
 

In3rt1a

Distinguished
Jun 9, 2013
554
0
19,110


I used to think more cores = way better performance, like you. But then I took a slap of logic and knowledge to the face.
 

ZeroRequiem

Honorable
Feb 1, 2014
653
0
11,160


No offense mate, but to post you have to confirm that you are over 13 years of age, by your comment I can safely say you are NOT older than 13. Sorry
 

RobCrezz

Expert
Ambassador


As you say, single thread performance, power consumption, overclocking performance, and AMD has nothing at the high end to compete with the socket 2011 CPUs like the 4930k or 4960x.

I like AMD, my work PC has an 8350. But this thread is ridiculous. Its not as simple as "More cores = More better", the 8350 isnt a true 8 core CPU, many things are shared by two of the integer cores. Compare the 8350 against a true 8 core Intel Xeon E5-2687W and you will see why the Intel CPU is so much more expensive.
 

VincezioVonHook

Honorable
Sep 24, 2013
89
0
10,660
who bloody cares, as long as your happy with your cpu and it is performing up to your expectations who fricken cares if a or b is better. This isn't a contest about bragging rights, its personal enjoyment. I think a lot of you have got to drop the fanboyism. im sick of a ll this bitching. If you reply with a "no read this bench" your just as bad as the trolls starting these threads.

An educated person is going to look at technical specifications and real world scenarios, not what some immature fanboy's of either side have to say!
 

RobCrezz

Expert
Ambassador


You should leave then, there will always be fanboyism.
 

Romenfousek

Honorable
Dec 21, 2013
153
0
10,690

Ok feel free to spend 1050 dolars on intel, whilst you could save 800 dolars by fx-8350. At the end it is the same
 


I don't think you realise just how much of a troll this is. If you don't like comparison of facts you shouldn't be on these forums. Personal enjoyment is subjective, facts are objective - subjectivity will get you nowhere in this general sphere.

Also this doesn't just affect this thread, it's also happening on others. It's a nice sentiment, but I don't agree with it.
 

Romenfousek

Honorable
Dec 21, 2013
153
0
10,690


The subjective is to say that amd is better
The objective is to say amd has more cores, thus better performance
Get your facts together pls
 

In3rt1a

Distinguished
Jun 9, 2013
554
0
19,110

First time trying to post pictures, lets see if this works...
99kq.jpg
[/URL]
Update: yay, it did!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts