Paq70 :
Hey guys, thought i'd put this up on the forum to see if anyone needed any help with creating a build. If you need a build just post the budget and if you need any peripherals or windows or a DVD drive included with it so i can accurately build you a PC so you have a guide line as to what to build.
Thanks Guys,
Paq70
Great. I need new pc to function as the server/workstation for at least two other clients. Some sensible folks at another site suggested they should all be on Win 7, vs. the XP I have been using. Security issues. They recommended refurb'd dual cores for the client machines: $200 each. That makes sense to me. Does it make sense to you? If that's not your expertise, just say so.
Background:
Now, on to the new server/workstation. This is a business--MS Office, Adobe Acrobat, Quickbooks, OCR, periodic Paint Shop Pro (dumb Photoshop, or we could make dumb use of Photoshop. Very remedial uses. At maximum untilization, let's say that each of the three computers would have 15 shared files open, and be on two browsers simultaneously, and get email notification on the desktop. In fact, let's say I add another client with the same needs.
Objective: Stability, durability, performance. I want the components least likely to fail for 5 years. I want an CPU that will still be pretty zippy for the next 5 years, I don't want a lot of waiting around on any of the three computers for things to open or calculate, or in moving around the internet. I'm interested in speed so long as it doesn't meaningfully reduce reliability and durability, and so long as I'll even notice it in what we do, and in the way business computing is likely to evolve in the next 5 years.
For the server, I think my component needs are:
Windows Pro 64 bit
DVD writer (one backup tool)
fast wireless/wired network capability
enough RAM so there is no waiting.
500 GB HDD (we now use about 150 GB)
a sturdy and speedy MB and CPU
We use a lot of USB connections, so if USB 3.0 is a lot faster (is it?), then why not have 4-6 of those?
I'm not sure what to do about an SSD. It has occurred to me to run the entire business on an SSD, and just copy the data once or twice a week to the HDD. There are indications that SSDs may not be as stable as HDDs, but it's mostly about power loss, which a UPC with shutdown software would seem to solve. But is that correct?
I could go as high as $900-$1,000 if the business on an SSD route is advisable. I could get a smaller SSD for programs only, and probably cut $100-$150 from the budget, reducing it to and go $750-$850. I could skip the SSD if it's simply not going to add productivity in a noticeable way or be stable enough for the business, and cut the budget to $550-$650.
It's not an investment in fun, so I want it to prudent and forward thinking. Why spend $1,000, when $550 will do just as well to meet current needs and foreseeable needs for 5 years? Why hold the budget at $550, when $1,000 really will provide better functionality that I would notice in my business? And just to repeat, the goals are stability, reliability, and noticeable performance. I would spend more to materially improve any of them.
Helping with these kinds of judgments may not be at all what you had in mind. But it never hurts to ask.