Dear all,
Need a life's advice. I'm having a choice between two systems. The thing is that i'm not a hardcore gamer, and I don't often rush for Ultra settings, but i still would like to play from time to time on a 42inch TV with a nice picture. So what would you suggest to take from the following to combinations?
FX 8350 163
RADEON R9 280x 269
Mobo: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 104
Corsair Vengeance Black 8GB 74
Toshiba HDD 45
SSD Kingston 58
Seasonic M12II-EVO620 620W 70
Zalman Z11 PLUS 72
Asus DRW-24F1ST/BLK/B/AS 13
HYPER 212 EVO 28
Arctic MX-2 Thermal Grease 5
Monitor: Benq XL2411Z 256
Total Cost 1160 EUR
OR
AMD Athlon X4 760k 69
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 660 155
MOBO: Asus A88X-PLUS 72
Corsair Vengeance Black 8GB 74
Toshiba HDD 45
Seasonic S12II-520 520W 80 Plus Bronze 67
Aerocool case ATX PGS STRIKE-X 33
Asus DRW-24F1ST/BLK/B/AS 13
Arctic MX-2 Thermal Grease 5
Monitor: Asus VS247N 144
Total Cost 680 EUR
As you see, the 1st combination is about the double price of the 1st one, therefore i'm thinking is it reasonable to take the 1st combination, even though it has a better performance, considering that I do not game that much?
Need a life's advice. I'm having a choice between two systems. The thing is that i'm not a hardcore gamer, and I don't often rush for Ultra settings, but i still would like to play from time to time on a 42inch TV with a nice picture. So what would you suggest to take from the following to combinations?
FX 8350 163
RADEON R9 280x 269
Mobo: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 104
Corsair Vengeance Black 8GB 74
Toshiba HDD 45
SSD Kingston 58
Seasonic M12II-EVO620 620W 70
Zalman Z11 PLUS 72
Asus DRW-24F1ST/BLK/B/AS 13
HYPER 212 EVO 28
Arctic MX-2 Thermal Grease 5
Monitor: Benq XL2411Z 256
Total Cost 1160 EUR
OR
AMD Athlon X4 760k 69
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 660 155
MOBO: Asus A88X-PLUS 72
Corsair Vengeance Black 8GB 74
Toshiba HDD 45
Seasonic S12II-520 520W 80 Plus Bronze 67
Aerocool case ATX PGS STRIKE-X 33
Asus DRW-24F1ST/BLK/B/AS 13
Arctic MX-2 Thermal Grease 5
Monitor: Asus VS247N 144
Total Cost 680 EUR
As you see, the 1st combination is about the double price of the 1st one, therefore i'm thinking is it reasonable to take the 1st combination, even though it has a better performance, considering that I do not game that much?