Acer's New UHD Monitor is a Little More Affordable
Tags:
-
Acer
-
Monitors
Last response: in News comments
N.Broekhuijsen
July 17, 2014 3:46:21 PM
Acer's CB280HK has been spotted in Europe for a very attractive price.
Acer's New UHD Monitor is a Little More Affordable : Read more
Acer's New UHD Monitor is a Little More Affordable : Read more
More about : acer uhd monitor affordable
Menigmand
July 17, 2014 4:23:25 PM
Related resources
- Where are the affordable UHD monitors? - Forum
- Looking for a good, but affordable 1080p monitor for my new build! - Forum
- New affordable all-around under $600 (without monitor) - Forum
- NEED HELP building new pc ($600-$1000 maby a little more budget) - Forum
- Looking for new monitor suggestions; seems I can't get more then a year out of one - Forum
Amdlova
July 17, 2014 6:21:07 PM
GoliathPtXs
July 17, 2014 8:43:04 PM
Bondfc11
July 17, 2014 9:40:26 PM
4K at 120Hz is still a ways off. Heck we don't even have any GPUs that could do that - not to mention the proper specs (no GPU with say HDMI 2.0).
Cheaper 4K panels are great, but a quality 1440 at 120Hz is still the sweet spot for me and my gaming rig for at least another year (well maybe the 3440x1440 monster from LG!)
Cheaper 4K panels are great, but a quality 1440 at 120Hz is still the sweet spot for me and my gaming rig for at least another year (well maybe the 3440x1440 monster from LG!)
Score
1
SirKnobsworth
July 18, 2014 1:04:25 AM
^ Guys, look at what my wishlist was for.
The reason I want 120hz is so that it supports G-Sync, meaning I would have a 4K monitor that I wouldn't have to worry too much about graphics power with. Because of the G-Sync, I could grow into running 4K, 120hz, as GPUs came around that could do that in a single card.
The reason I want 120hz is so that it supports G-Sync, meaning I would have a 4K monitor that I wouldn't have to worry too much about graphics power with. Because of the G-Sync, I could grow into running 4K, 120hz, as GPUs came around that could do that in a single card.
Score
-2
SirKnobsworth said:
HDMI 2.0 won't even do 4k@120Hz - it's only about as fast as DisplayPort 1.2. DP1.3 will do it, but the spec isn't even finalized yet.That's a fair point, but my wish was for long term.
If this thing were to happen short term, it would have to use the same thing that early 4k displays did and stitch the picture together with a pair of DP 1.2 connections. Though that would probably wreak havoc with the G-sync module, unless they used two of them and were left with a monitor more expensive than the average gaming computer.
Score
-1
WINTERLORD
July 18, 2014 3:56:40 AM
WRXSTIGuy
July 18, 2014 1:01:28 PM
childofthekorn
July 18, 2014 2:20:43 PM
soldier44
July 18, 2014 5:44:39 PM
soldier44
July 19, 2014 7:35:46 PM
soldier44 said:
So many haters on 4K. Stick with your lame 1080p crap regardless of 120-144hz no one cares about those tiny displays but you handful of morons squinting at 22-24" lol.You will also be in the squinting crowd with a 30" 4k display. Scale all you want.... you will have a headache after 45 minutes. You need to be over 50" @ 4k, minimum.
The idea of planting yourself in front of a 50", 4k display to game on is a little crazy and probably won't happen in any meaningful numbers. I'd much rather have an Oculus Rift with full integration into game AND web development, going forward.
Score
-1
wiyosaya
July 21, 2014 9:38:41 AM
woodscrews
July 22, 2014 6:05:20 AM
its nice, but id take a nice, 24" IPS 1440p screen over this any day, TN is no good to me whatsoever
ever hear of DPI scaling, retard?
You will also be in the squinting crowd with a 30" 4k display. Scale all you want.... you will have a headache after 45 minutes. You need to be over 50" @ 4k, minimum.
not all of us are running <mod edit> operating systems
Quote:
4k on anything smaller than 50-52" is just stupid. What a waste of money. The ones yelling loudest for this have no idea what they are screaming for. They just like to hear their heads rattle, I suppose.ever hear of DPI scaling, retard?
Quote:
You will also be in the squinting crowd with a 30" 4k display. Scale all you want.... you will have a headache after 45 minutes. You need to be over 50" @ 4k, minimum.
not all of us are running <mod edit> operating systems
Score
0
woodscrews said:
its nice, but id take a nice, 24" IPS 1440p screen over this any day, TN is no good to me whatsoeverQuote:
4k on anything smaller than 50-52" is just stupid. What a waste of money. The ones yelling loudest for this have no idea what they are screaming for. They just like to hear their heads rattle, I suppose.ever hear of DPI scaling, retard?
Quote:
You will also be in the squinting crowd with a 30" 4k display. Scale all you want.... you will have a headache after 45 minutes. You need to be over 50" @ 4k, minimum.
not all of us are running <mod edit> operating systems
You quoted my scaling comment.... But I guess you didn't read it. Here it is one more time for you. Scale all you want.... you will have a headache after 45 minutes. You need to be over 50" @ 4k, minimum
Your sensitivity on this issue is rather alarming..... I hope you're not a gun nut.
I would guess you're naming Windows 7 as the <mod edit> OS because Win 8.1 will let you scale away the resolution you just bought?
Score
-1
woodscrews
July 22, 2014 10:24:41 AM
skit75 said:
woodscrews said:
its nice, but id take a nice, 24" IPS 1440p screen over this any day, TN is no good to me whatsoeverQuote:
4k on anything smaller than 50-52" is just stupid. What a waste of money. The ones yelling loudest for this have no idea what they are screaming for. They just like to hear their heads rattle, I suppose.ever hear of DPI scaling, retard?
Quote:
You will also be in the squinting crowd with a 30" 4k display. Scale all you want.... you will have a headache after 45 minutes. You need to be over 50" @ 4k, minimum.
not all of us are running <mod edit> operating systems
You quoted my scaling comment.... But I guess you didn't read it. Here it is one more time for you. Scale all you want.... you will have a headache after 45 minutes. You need to be over 50" @ 4k, minimum
Your sensitivity on this issue is rather alarming..... I hope you're not a gun nut.
I would guess you're naming Windows 7 as the <mod edit> OS because Win 8.1 will let you scale away the resolution you just bought?
>Scale all you want.... you will have a headache after 45 minutes. You need to be over 50" @ 4k, minimum
well, guess id best ditch my smartphone then
>Your sensitivity on this issue is rather alarming..... I hope you're not a gun nut.
mocking retards like you who genuinely believe that high PPI displays are bad is fun
>I would guess you're naming Windows 7 as the shit OS because Win 8.1 will let you scale away the resolution you just bought?
nah
you see, less <mod edit> OS' use vector graphics for their interface elements, which means we get a nice, crisper image :^)
sent from my ~145 PPI SXGA+ x61t
Score
0
soldier44 said:
Hey... whatever floats your boat. Lets go to your house for movie night... We can stream Breaking Bad on Netflix in 4k on your 28" and have popcorn.... /rolleyesExcept that we aren't talking about watching movies, this is a monitor - a high end one, made to be paired with either a graphic design workstation, or a gaming computer.
When you're gaming, having a super high resolution on a small screen is just about the best thing you could have... and claiming it's bad because you have to sit close, well... that's just laughable.
Score
0
Related resources
- SolvedBuying a new video card for triple-monitor support and more vram? Forum
- SolvedRefurbished Asus VG236HE monitor vs new Acer GD235HZbid monitor Forum
- Ghosting on a new Acer LCD Monitor Forum
- Help fixing my Acer laptop- cannot afford a shop nor a new laptop. Forum
- PC lags more often after purchasing new monitor ! Forum
- Bought new Acer Monitor and it's causing eye strain Forum
- Resolution issues with new Acer X193W monitor Forum
- 15" monitor brand new, with lots more for a steal Forum
- Any more new 15" 4:3 ratio monitors Forum
- More resources
!