Google has HTC Nexus 9 coming in Nov with Denver 64bit K1, I hope MS can do this also. However the device will fail if it's not priced near andriod. Previous models have failed mostly due to price, and in surface 1's case the choice of Tegra 1.3ghz when they should have used the 1.7ghz that was available already in a phone before their device launched. Perf would have been FAR better with another 400mhz of tegra3 and IIRC another 100mhz+ on the gpu side too. I don't think you'd have seen reviewers whining about slow perf if they had done that, and at the price they asked for the first surface RT, it is absolutely ridiculous they chose a chip that was probably only saving $5. Tegra 3 was selling for $22-25 to both MS and Google. I doubt there was more than a dollar or two difference for the 1.7ghz version, $5 tops. Surely they could have fit that in that enormous price budget they had. These first two have failed due to MS itself. Priced right the 3rd can sell. Surface pros won't do very well either, I mean $800 minimum for pro 3? I can buy a 15.6in loaded HP laptop with a discrete NV gpu for $900 with a near top end i7.
http://www.shopping.hp.com/webapp/shopping/cto.do
i7-4700q, win7, Geforce 740 2GB, 12GB, upgraded screen to 1080p, 1TB HD. $855 and for 8GB instead of 12 you can knock another $75 off ($780 pretty loaded!). WTH would I buy a surface pro 3 for that sucks perf wise for $800 min and top end is $2000! There are more than a few reasons ultrabooks don't sell already, surface pro3 is just worse than those even. I don't get the pricing on these MS products. Are they trying to fail? Anyone with half a brain (so far due to pricing etc) would just buy a laptop like I described above except in very specific situations (a few road warriors maybe that want thin/light?). Why ditch all the power otherwise? You can game a bit on an i7-4700/GT740 with 2GB and 8GB main memory. Surface 3 pro? NOPE. You have to go FAR above $800 to get anywhere near the laptop from HP. It's just stupid.
I'd expect this thing to be 4GB or more memory, 1080p, K1, 80GB and priced $450, MHL 3.0, USB3, etc in too. Currently the surface 2 with 64GB/2GBmem/T4 is $549. That's $100 too much at least hence poor sales again. Look at what you get with NV's new Shield tablet for $300. I mean c'mon MS. WinRT is worthless compared to android and all it's games/apps, not to mention all the features of shield tablet especially if you have a great PC already. Anything over $450 from surface 3 for the top end will be a problem again (not talking LTE here, that's an addon, just the base top model). I can understand $450 if specs are better than shield, IE 4GB, more storage, larger screen, but not $550 again.