Acer Built A 27-Inch 144Hz G-Sync Monitor
Tags:
-
Gaming
-
Monitors
-
Acer
Last response: in News comments
N.Broekhuijsen
August 20, 2014 10:26:41 AM
More about : acer built inch 144hz sync monitor
-
Reply to N.Broekhuijsen
Bondfc11
August 20, 2014 10:36:49 AM
Zeroplanetz
August 20, 2014 10:55:42 AM
Related resources
- How can I run a 4k Gsync and a 1080p 144hz monitor together but seperate? - Forum
- How can I run a 4k Gsync and a 1080p 144hz monitor together but seperate? - Forum
- 144Hz, Gsync, 4K, 1440p ? Future gaming monitor? - Forum
- ASUS RoG Swift PG278Q G-Sync 144hz 1440p Monitor as main monitor - Need Help Picking two side monitors for 3 monitor setup - Forum
- A good G-Sync 1080p Monitor with g-sync already built in? - Forum
agentbb007
August 20, 2014 10:57:42 AM
moogleslam
August 20, 2014 10:59:06 AM
Gillerer
August 20, 2014 11:46:39 AM
deftonian
August 20, 2014 11:51:50 AM
Quote:
Please don't release this in the US. A 27" 1920x1080 panel is atrocious to look at - even with Gsync this is a fail. Come on now keep the larger formats for the WQHD panels and leave the 1080 to the 24"/23" crowd. And don't get me started on using TN at this screen size!That's a ridiculous accusation to say that 1920x1080 is "atrocious" @ 27". I believe what you mean to say/generalize is that WQHD looks better @ 27", but 1080p is from from atrocious. I've been using 1080p monitors for years and never did I think it looks terrible.
-
Reply to deftonian
m
3
l
Bondfc11
August 20, 2014 12:20:20 PM
Quote:
Quote:
Please don't release this in the US. A 27" 1920x1080 panel is atrocious to look at - even with Gsync this is a fail. Come on now keep the larger formats for the WQHD panels and leave the 1080 to the 24"/23" crowd. And don't get me started on using TN at this screen size!That's a ridiculous accusation to say that 1920x1080 is "atrocious" @ 27". I believe what you mean to say/generalize is that WQHD looks better @ 27", but 1080p is from from atrocious. I've been using 1080p monitors for years and never did I think it looks terrible.
I meant 1080 at 27". Come on now - that size and resolution is more pockmarked than a 16 year olds face!
You really like the look of a pixelated screen at that size? Wow. Ok I didn't mean to overgeneralize I suppose, but 1080 at anything above 24" starts looking nasty in my opinion. How's that - better? Just my opinion - that's all this is!
-
Reply to Bondfc11
m
0
l
iknowhowtofixit
August 20, 2014 1:41:58 PM
somebodyspecial
August 20, 2014 4:38:49 PM
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Please don't release this in the US. A 27" 1920x1080 panel is atrocious to look at - even with Gsync this is a fail. Come on now keep the larger formats for the WQHD panels and leave the 1080 to the 24"/23" crowd. And don't get me started on using TN at this screen size!That's a ridiculous accusation to say that 1920x1080 is "atrocious" @ 27". I believe what you mean to say/generalize is that WQHD looks better @ 27", but 1080p is from from atrocious. I've been using 1080p monitors for years and never did I think it looks terrible.
I meant 1080 at 27". Come on now - that size and resolution is more pockmarked than a 16 year olds face!
You really like the look of a pixelated screen at that size? Wow. Ok I didn't mean to overgeneralize I suppose, but 1080 at anything above 24" starts looking nasty in my opinion. How's that - better? Just my opinion - that's all this is!
My 1920x1200 dell looks GREAT on 24in. No idea what you're talking about. Would I buy higher for 27? Yes, but I would pay more than what they're probably going to price this at ($400-500 US probably). My Dell 24 was near top end at $650 when I bought it. Also if you don't have the cards ('s, as in plural) to push those resolutions what's the point? 1440p can easily bring 780ti to it's knees when maxed out in most games (which is the only way I'll play, MAXED everything), and most don't have the cash for a $500 monitor and a pair of higher end cards.
-
Reply to somebodyspecial
m
0
l
ShadyHamster
August 20, 2014 5:37:01 PM
Bondfc11 said:
Quote:
Quote:
Please don't release this in the US. A 27" 1920x1080 panel is atrocious to look at - even with Gsync this is a fail. Come on now keep the larger formats for the WQHD panels and leave the 1080 to the 24"/23" crowd. And don't get me started on using TN at this screen size!That's a ridiculous accusation to say that 1920x1080 is "atrocious" @ 27". I believe what you mean to say/generalize is that WQHD looks better @ 27", but 1080p is from from atrocious. I've been using 1080p monitors for years and never did I think it looks terrible.
I meant 1080 at 27". Come on now - that size and resolution is more pockmarked than a 16 year olds face!
You really like the look of a pixelated screen at that size? Wow. Ok I didn't mean to overgeneralize I suppose, but 1080 at anything above 24" starts looking nasty in my opinion. How's that - better? Just my opinion - that's all this is!
1080p at 27" seems perfectly fine for me, I sit around 80cm (30.5") away from the screen.
The only time i can start picking the pixelation is around 30-40cm from the screen but i almost never sit that close to the screen anyway.
-
Reply to ShadyHamster
m
1
l
soldier44
August 20, 2014 5:45:40 PM
-
Reply to fkr
m
1
l
bmdc
August 20, 2014 8:16:35 PM
Garry Chen
August 20, 2014 11:21:11 PM
icemunk
August 21, 2014 4:38:16 AM
Phuntasm
August 21, 2014 6:41:56 AM
-
Reply to Phuntasm
m
0
l
therealduckofdeath
August 21, 2014 10:00:32 AM
Quote:
Please don't release this in the US. A 27" 1920x1080 panel is atrocious to look at - even with Gsync this is a fail. Come on now keep the larger formats for the WQHD panels and leave the 1080 to the 24"/23" crowd. And don't get me started on using TN at this screen size!IPS at 144Hz would be fraudulent as IPS really can't handle those frequencies. For gaming 1080p at 27 inch is acceptable.
-
Reply to therealduckofdeath
m
0
l
Garry Chen said:
I'm just gonna wait for OLED started going cheaper because its excellent vieweing angles and non-existent response time and beautiful colorsOLED display had flaw that color degenerate much quicker..
it makes sense in phone/tablet but in monitor that have longer life cycle it still not good..
or they have found a way to fix/patch it, that I might not know...
-
Reply to rdc85
m
0
l
therealduckofdeath said:
Quote:
Please don't release this in the US. A 27" 1920x1080 panel is atrocious to look at - even with Gsync this is a fail. Come on now keep the larger formats for the WQHD panels and leave the 1080 to the 24"/23" crowd. And don't get me started on using TN at this screen size!IPS at 144Hz would be fraudulent as IPS really can't handle those frequencies. For gaming 1080p at 27 inch is acceptable.
http://www.blurbusters.com/overclock/120hz-1440p-ips-mo...
these are ips pls monitors that can do 120hz @ 1440p. i have the qnix and i run 96hz just because even with 2x 7950's i cannot hit 120 fps in most games i play.
-
Reply to fkr
m
0
l
hakkafusion
August 22, 2014 1:10:02 PM
Quote:
therealduckofdeath said:
Quote:
Please don't release this in the US. A 27" 1920x1080 panel is atrocious to look at - even with Gsync this is a fail. Come on now keep the larger formats for the WQHD panels and leave the 1080 to the 24"/23" crowd. And don't get me started on using TN at this screen size!IPS at 144Hz would be fraudulent as IPS really can't handle those frequencies. For gaming 1080p at 27 inch is acceptable.
http://www.blurbusters.com/overclock/120hz-1440p-ips-mo...
these are ips pls monitors that can do 120hz @ 1440p. i have the qnix and i run 96hz just because even with 2x 7950's i cannot hit 120 fps in most games i play.
However, it's undeniable that the qnix @ 96hz there's enough ghosting to annoy most of us. It's not that noticeable if you don't compare it, but sit that next to another 27inch 1ms TN panel also @ 96hz (ie. XL2720T) it's almost night and day difference.
Though I'm ridiculous happy with my 3x qnix 2710. Best $1k I've ever spend.
-
Reply to hakkafusion
m
0
l
!