Yes, just google "96 ppi" .... for one, Windows is designed for 96 dpi because someone decided that was the point that was the optimal amount to display fonts on a screen way back when based upon keeping the edges smooth and of appropriate size......the further from that, fonts start to get "funny". On paper, < 300 dots per inch and images start to appear grainy, but on a brightly lit screen it's much lower. Depending on your age, most find rulers usable down to a 16th of an inch.....now divide that 1/16th by 6 more lines, that gets a bit harder..... now have all those lines throwing beams of light at your eyeballs and the bleed from each individual source tends to "hide" or blot out the black spaces in between.
Another way to look at it is this ..... what is "on the market" .....
9 panel sizes for 1920 x 1080, only one goes below 91.8
9 panel sized at 1600 x 1200 / 1600 x 1050 ..... smallest one is 94
5 panel sized at 1600 x 900 ..... smallest one is 91.8
At the high end 2560 x 1440 and 256 x 1600 are both above 100. It's only in the very popular 1920 x 1080 / 1200 sizes do we see any manufacturers trying to sell anything below 90 ppi.
Some people have 20/10 vision ..... normal is considered 20/20, others "go bigger",.... have a room full of people start at 15 feet away and start walking towards a big screen TV and "stop" when the screen gets blurry or they can see individual pixels.....you will not see everyone stopping at the same point.
I always like to say "No one is ever wrong, when there's a disagreement, one of the parties is just misinformed or ill informed". You can think what you want, I'm not trolling, just took the time to get "informed". Not saying that in a smarty pants way but that in trying to learn about the subject I asked around, here and elsewhere, researched and absorbed information from those before me who took the time to research and kindly point me to information on the subject.
There's also the issue of monitor quality ... you do get what you pay for, just because a high quality IPS monitor will show an improvement in image editing over a TN monitor, doesn't mean that a $150 IPS will do it better than a $150 TN.
As for ghosting, you may not be seeing it but other people do and hi speed cameras do provide the evidence.
60 Hz
120 Hz
120 Hz w/ Lightboost
Try this
http://testufo.com/#test=framerates
More here:
http://www.blurbusters.com/
Also, find a good site like tftcentral that does very detailed reviews. Many sites read like barely more than than cut / paste press releases
here's a popular $850 IPS monitor
here's a popular $375 144 Hz 27" monitor
Which image ya like better ?
Finally we have an 24" IPS (3 years old), we have a 23.6" 120 Hz (2 years old) and we have a 23.6" 144 Hz TN (9 months old) as well as various other screen (6 desktops, 5 laptops).... All of us here have used each of them for photo editing, all of us here have used them for gaming .... all of us here have come to the same conclusions based upon long term experience with all 3 screens.....when we edit photos, everyone wants the IPS, when we play games, last one in a chair has to settle for the IPS.
)
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram