Report: Predicted Synthetic Benchmark Scores For GTX 980
Tags:
-
Graphics Cards
-
Components
- Nvidia
Last response: in News comments
VideoCardz.com has calculated the results of synthetically benchmarking a GTX 980 and GTX 970, based on their predicted specifications, which may sound a bit ridiculous, but there is something to it.
Report: Predicted Synthetic Benchmark Scores For GTX 980 : Read more
Report: Predicted Synthetic Benchmark Scores For GTX 980 : Read more
More about : report predicted synthetic benchmark scores gtx 980
-
Reply to N.Broekhuijsen
jasonelmore
September 8, 2014 12:43:50 PM
cewhidx
September 8, 2014 1:16:29 PM
Related resources
- Bad heaven benchmark with GTX 980 - Forum
- Need GTX 980 vs 970 benchmarks. - Forum
- how is that's one gtx 980 has higher score than one 290x, but 2x 290x have higher score than 2x gtx 980? - Forum
- gtx 980 benchmarks for blender? - Forum
- Geforce GTX 780 Ti - Benchmark score on UniEngine Valley - Forum
jas340
September 8, 2014 1:40:10 PM
4ktv
September 8, 2014 1:46:02 PM
sportfreak23
September 8, 2014 1:59:09 PM
icemunk
September 8, 2014 2:36:52 PM
elbert
September 8, 2014 3:10:09 PM
It's apparently been confirmed by multiple e-tailers listing the SKU # in their POS system as "GTX 980 4GB 256b" etc.
To answer your second question I'll point you to Videocardz.com :
Long story short, if NVIDIA didn’t rename 800 series to 900 series, we would have desktop 800 and mobile 900M series in relatively short time.
"That said, NVIDIA has finally came to the conclusion that synchronizing desktop and mobile platform series is crucial to keeping things simple. So technically there are no desktop 800 series, unless of course NVIDIA decides to launch them as OEM exclusive."
http://videocardz.com/51426/nvidia-to-skip-geforce-800-...
To answer your second question I'll point you to Videocardz.com :
Long story short, if NVIDIA didn’t rename 800 series to 900 series, we would have desktop 800 and mobile 900M series in relatively short time.
"That said, NVIDIA has finally came to the conclusion that synchronizing desktop and mobile platform series is crucial to keeping things simple. So technically there are no desktop 800 series, unless of course NVIDIA decides to launch them as OEM exclusive."
http://videocardz.com/51426/nvidia-to-skip-geforce-800-...
-
Reply to anthony8989
m
1
l
Quote:
Are GPU's topping out like CPU's did a couple of years ago? Looks like if you bought an i7-2700K and a GTX 780 after the price cut you have gotten the most bang out of your buck then and for the foreseeable future.LOL or if you got a 7970 3 years ago and just overclocked to perform the same as the silly overpriced 780.
-
Reply to CaptainTom
m
0
l
dragonsqrrl
September 8, 2014 3:55:26 PM
Quote:
Is it confirmed that Nvidia is skipping the 800 name for desktops? And if so, why? If true it wouldn't really surprise me, it's not the first time this has happened, and it fits with similar jumps in naming from Nvidia/AMD in the past. This was the case with the GTX 300m series (if you can even refer to it as a series), the HD 9000m series, and the current 800m series, which is largely Kepler based. These mobile-only 'generations' are basically meant to please the OEMs who expect a refreshed lineup annually, and sometimes GPU roadmaps and OEM expectations don't align, so stuff like this happens. I guess the skip on the desktop side keeps the architectures in equivalent mobile and desktop lineups relatively cohesive. So basically, if there's ever a time when a new architecture is on the horizon, and Nvidia or AMD announce a new mobile lineup based on the current gen architecture, giving it the expected next gen naming scheme, that's probably a good indication there's going to be a skip on the desktop side.
-
Reply to dragonsqrrl
m
0
l
dragonsqrrl
September 8, 2014 4:04:34 PM
dragonsqrrl
September 8, 2014 4:12:42 PM
spentshells said:
Tonga has got this when they implement it all away accross all models.Good luck nv
Tonga is based off of Hawaii, they've already implemented it across most of their current lineup. What difference would patching up the few remaining holes make besides further obscuring their naming convention?
-
Reply to dragonsqrrl
m
1
l
Chris Droste
September 8, 2014 4:19:29 PM
to really steal the show the 980 needs to retail for less than a market-priced 290X w/3rd party cooling and at the minimum be in the 780Ti's performance envelope. if this debuts like that, nVidia would be the sales king of the holidays with AMD blowing out prices left and right to keep pace while it readies a high-end Tonga card. since the 285 came(yawn) my guess is the new high-end from AMD isn't coming til Q1 2015 at best.
-
Reply to Chris Droste
m
0
l
The3monitors
September 8, 2014 4:20:17 PM
Quote:
So yeah this gen is gonna be exactly what most of us assumed: Same performance, less power usage. However the 990 might be kick-ass!This. I'm saving up for a 990. Combined with custom watercooling for silence and the ROG Swift that I'm also saving for, it's going to be an incredible upgrade. The lower power draw of the 990 will mean less heat and less noise, which actually does matter for both small form factor rigs and ones that watercool for silence.
-
Reply to DarkSable
m
0
l
dragonsqrrl said:
spentshells said:
Tonga has got this when they implement it all away accross all models.Good luck nv
Tonga is based off of Hawaii, they've already implemented it across most of their current lineup. What difference would patching up the few remaining holes make besides further obscuring their naming convention?
290(x)280x 270(x) 265 260x are not using tonga, so less heat more performance per watt while using the smaller memory interface while staying within the same generation spells bad news for nv in the performance war. When they use the arch refinements with a wider mem interface a la 280x @ 384 or hawaii with 512 the gains should be substantial. with a refined gpu and a wider memory bus they will have the winning lineup.
Hey im still sticking with NV, but Im impressed with the lowering power draw and using the smaller interface yet still showing slight (very slight) performance increases with the 280.
On second thought that sounds like a new gen(lol) of cards to me.
Tonga GPU is based on the Tahiti design
-
Reply to spentshells
m
0
l
yay
September 8, 2014 10:34:10 PM
Chris Droste said:
to really steal the show the 980 needs to retail for less than a market-priced 290X w/3rd party cooling and at the minimum be in the 780Ti's performance envelope. if this debuts like that, nVidia would be the sales king of the holidays with AMD blowing out prices left and right to keep pace while it readies a high-end Tonga card. since the 285 came(yawn) my guess is the new high-end from AMD isn't coming til Q1 2015 at best. well the 290xtx is still comingout this year. sounds like all the other models are getting revisions to.
ICELAND will be a revision of the Pitcairn.
-
Reply to spentshells
m
0
l
yay
September 8, 2014 10:38:36 PM
blubbey
September 9, 2014 2:05:35 AM
blubbey
September 9, 2014 2:39:58 AM
Oh and not to mention the supposed power draw numbers. It's supposed to be around 175W or so. You're getting around 780Ti performance (greater than 780Ti stock but obviously they're clocked very differently) for about 2/3rds of the power on the same node from the 770 replacement - GM204. How can you not appreciate this?
-
Reply to blubbey
m
1
l
Why all sites (Guru3D included) report this like GTX980 is slower than GTX780ti?
According to this graph, stock GTX980 is 11% faster than stock GTX780ti (100/90).
Also the memory clock remains the same and despite that increasing the core clock by 6% they are getting 5% performance which means one thing.
256bit GDDR5 does not bottleneck this GPU!
According to this graph, stock GTX980 is 11% faster than stock GTX780ti (100/90).
Also the memory clock remains the same and despite that increasing the core clock by 6% they are getting 5% performance which means one thing.
256bit GDDR5 does not bottleneck this GPU!
-
Reply to Memnarchon
m
3
l
Steveymoo
September 9, 2014 9:22:33 AM
f-14
September 9, 2014 10:46:06 AM
prediction reporting....i'm not even going to bother reading and the chart means nothing with out a product. to me that's like the last 20 years of cherry picked weather reporting out of 4,54X,XXX,XXX billion years on one test subject out of a universe.
might as well be the 5 day weather forecast imo.
this revising of one particular chip design isn't worth more than spending $100 on and waiting 5 years for the next chip architecture design is better bang for the buck.
the enabling of shader modules that were previously disabled and the removal of memory interface chokes that are still subpar at best considering the 384bit and 512 bit interfaces of the 9000 & 200 series as well as amd's 3000 series.
i guess they can get away with it when the resolution has been restricted to 1080p for over 10 years. every one thank sony for this blockade in computer graphics/gaming that has kept consoles viable as a gaming platform and blurry pixelated movies over 50".
might as well be the 5 day weather forecast imo.
this revising of one particular chip design isn't worth more than spending $100 on and waiting 5 years for the next chip architecture design is better bang for the buck.
the enabling of shader modules that were previously disabled and the removal of memory interface chokes that are still subpar at best considering the 384bit and 512 bit interfaces of the 9000 & 200 series as well as amd's 3000 series.
i guess they can get away with it when the resolution has been restricted to 1080p for over 10 years. every one thank sony for this blockade in computer graphics/gaming that has kept consoles viable as a gaming platform and blurry pixelated movies over 50".
-
Reply to f-14
m
0
l
Avus
September 9, 2014 11:01:00 AM
dragonsqrrl
September 9, 2014 11:28:17 AM
Memnarchon said:
Why all sites (Guru3D included) report this like GTX980 is slower than GTX780ti? According to this graph, stock GTX980 is 11% faster than stock GTX780ti (100/90).
Also the memory clock remains the same and despite that increasing the core clock by 6% they are getting 5% performance which means one thing.
256bit GDDR5 does not bottleneck this GPU!
Well... keep in mind that these numbers are extrapolated from leaked specs and what we already know about Maxwell. They're purely synthetic, so take them with a big grain of salt. However the performance results they came to do seem surprisingly believable.
-
Reply to dragonsqrrl
m
0
l
dragonsqrrl said:
Well... keep in mind that these numbers are extrapolated from leaked specs and what we already know about Maxwell. They're purely synthetic, so take them with a big grain of salt. However the performance results they came to do seem surprisingly believable. Yeah, I forgot to add that "if people at VideoCardz are not trolling...."
-
Reply to Memnarchon
m
0
l
Ninjawithagun
September 9, 2014 12:41:17 PM
dragonsqrrl
September 9, 2014 12:56:59 PM
spentshells said:
dragonsqrrl said:
spentshells said:
Tonga has got this when they implement it all away accross all models.Good luck nv
Tonga is based off of Hawaii, they've already implemented it across most of their current lineup. What difference would patching up the few remaining holes make besides further obscuring their naming convention?
290(x)280x 270(x) 265 260x are not using tonga,
Tonga GPU is based on the Tahiti design
I didn't say any of those cards use Tonga. I said "Tonga is based off of Hawaii", and many of the architectural refinements in Tonga are already available in Hawaii and Bonaire. Every 285 review I've read, including the one here on Tom's, has pretty much stated the same, that Tonga is essentially a further refinement of GCN 1.1. They went on to provide many examples of inherited architectural refinements from Hawaii. So I'm not sure where you're getting this "Tonga GPU is based on the Tahiti" from.
spentshells said:
so less heat more performance per watt while using the smaller memory interface while staying within the same generation spells bad news for nv in the performance war.Haven't heard of Maxwell, or something? You're commenting in an article speculating about it, so I find this assertion a little strange.
spentshells said:
When they use the arch refinements with a wider mem interface a la 280x @ 384 or hawaii with 512 the gains should be substantial. with a refined gpu and a wider memory bus they will have the winning lineup.Yaa, I don't think the image compression is going to result in much of a performance boost, if any. If anything its main benefit is maintaining performance on narrower buses and reducing the dependence on wider buses (like Maxwell), so I'm not sure why you're anticipating a big performance benefit from pairing a higher-end Tonga-like GPU with a much wider bus, or why you're anticipating Nvidia having trouble responding to these refinements when they essentially already have. It's not going to make a difference unless it actually needs that additional bandwidth, so I would think the goal of a refresh like you're suggesting would be to reduce the bus width as opposed to maintaining it (a la 285).
-
Reply to dragonsqrrl
m
0
l
coolitic
September 9, 2014 1:19:05 PM
dragonsqrrl said:
spentshells said:
dragonsqrrl said:
spentshells said:
Tonga has got this when they implement it all away accross all models.Good luck nv
Tonga is based off of Hawaii, they've already implemented it across most of their current lineup. What difference would patching up the few remaining holes make besides further obscuring their naming convention?
290(x)280x 270(x) 265 260x are not using tonga,
Tonga GPU is based on the Tahiti design
I didn't say any of those cards use Tonga. I said "Tonga is based off of Hawaii", and many of the architectural refinements in Tonga are already available in Hawaii and Bonaire. Every 285 review I've read, including the one here on Tom's, has pretty much stated the same, that Tonga is essentially a further refinement of GCN 1.1. They went on to provide many examples of inherited architectural refinements from Hawaii. So I'm not sure where you're getting this "Tonga GPU is based on the Tahiti" from.
spentshells said:
so less heat more performance per watt while using the smaller memory interface while staying within the same generation spells bad news for nv in the performance war.Haven't heard of Maxwell, or something? You're commenting in an article speculating about it, so I find this assertion a little strange.
spentshells said:
When they use the arch refinements with a wider mem interface a la 280x @ 384 or hawaii with 512 the gains should be substantial. with a refined gpu and a wider memory bus they will have the winning lineup.Yaa, I don't think the image compression is going to result in much of a performance boost, if any. If anything its main benefit is maintaining performance on narrower buses and reducing the dependence on wider buses (like Maxwell), so I'm not sure why you're anticipating a big performance benefit from pairing a higher-end Tonga-like GPU with a much wider bus, or why you're anticipating Nvidia having trouble responding to these refinements when they essentially already have. It's not going to make a difference unless it actually needs that additional bandwidth, so I would think the goal of a refresh like you're suggesting would be to reduce the bus width as opposed to maintaining it (a la 285).
Tonga is not based off hawaii its off tahiti
pitcarin when reviesed will be iceland
hawai xt is going to become hawaii xtx
-
Reply to spentshells
m
0
l
spentshells said:
so less heat more performance per watt while using the smaller memory interface while staying within the same generation spells bad news for nv in the performance war.
Haven't heard of Maxwell, or something? You're commenting in an article speculating about it, so I find this assertion a little strange.
I was referring only to tahiti vs tonga for power requirements.
I would deffinately advise you try out google for any of these questions
bonaire is not using tonga revisions as it isn't using the same core (tahiti) but is based on the tech used for xbox and ps4 (xbox at least)
Yer really making a deal out of being told what is what and that isn't the point. Read a little more and you will see what you are saying is off and wrong.
so less heat more performance per watt while using the smaller memory interface while staying within the same generation spells bad news for nv in the performance war.
Haven't heard of Maxwell, or something? You're commenting in an article speculating about it, so I find this assertion a little strange.
I was referring only to tahiti vs tonga for power requirements.
I would deffinately advise you try out google for any of these questions
bonaire is not using tonga revisions as it isn't using the same core (tahiti) but is based on the tech used for xbox and ps4 (xbox at least)
Yer really making a deal out of being told what is what and that isn't the point. Read a little more and you will see what you are saying is off and wrong.
-
Reply to spentshells
m
0
l
dragonsqrrl
September 9, 2014 4:03:45 PM
spentshells said:
dragonsqrrl said:
spentshells said:
dragonsqrrl said:
spentshells said:
Tonga has got this when they implement it all away accross all models.Good luck nv
Tonga is based off of Hawaii, they've already implemented it across most of their current lineup. What difference would patching up the few remaining holes make besides further obscuring their naming convention?
290(x)280x 270(x) 265 260x are not using tonga,
Tonga GPU is based on the Tahiti design
I didn't say any of those cards use Tonga. I said "Tonga is based off of Hawaii", and many of the architectural refinements in Tonga are already available in Hawaii and Bonaire. Every 285 review I've read, including the one here on Tom's, has pretty much stated the same, that Tonga is essentially a further refinement of GCN 1.1. They went on to provide many examples of inherited architectural refinements from Hawaii. So I'm not sure where you're getting this "Tonga GPU is based on the Tahiti" from.
spentshells said:
so less heat more performance per watt while using the smaller memory interface while staying within the same generation spells bad news for nv in the performance war.Haven't heard of Maxwell, or something? You're commenting in an article speculating about it, so I find this assertion a little strange.
spentshells said:
When they use the arch refinements with a wider mem interface a la 280x @ 384 or hawaii with 512 the gains should be substantial. with a refined gpu and a wider memory bus they will have the winning lineup.Yaa, I don't think the image compression is going to result in much of a performance boost, if any. If anything its main benefit is maintaining performance on narrower buses and reducing the dependence on wider buses (like Maxwell), so I'm not sure why you're anticipating a big performance benefit from pairing a higher-end Tonga-like GPU with a much wider bus, or why you're anticipating Nvidia having trouble responding to these refinements when they essentially already have. It's not going to make a difference unless it actually needs that additional bandwidth, so I would think the goal of a refresh like you're suggesting would be to reduce the bus width as opposed to maintaining it (a la 285).
Tonga is not based off hawaii its off tahiti
pitcarin when reviesed will be iceland
hawai xt is going to become hawaii xtx
...okay dude.
"Despite what its specifications may suggest, Tonga is not a spin on the Tahiti GPU in the Radeon R9 280 and 280X. Rather, it is a new and condensed version of the Hawaii GPU in the Radeon R9 290 and 290X."
"In addition, the Radeon R9 285 inherits the 290 series' quad-shader layout, allowing four primitives to be rendered per clock cycle instead of two."
"Of course, Tonga has inherited Hawaii's fixed-function hardware, too, such as TrueAudio (AMD's new audio processor) and project FreeSync (the open-source answer to Nvidia's G-Sync) support."
Tonga is two steps removed from Tahiti, and from an architectural standpoint it's obvious it's inherited a lot from GCN 1.1 (Hawaii, Bonaire).
-
Reply to dragonsqrrl
m
0
l
dragonsqrrl said:
spentshells said:
dragonsqrrl said:
spentshells said:
Tonga has got this when they implement it all away accross all models.Good luck nv
Tonga is based off of Hawaii, they've already implemented it across most of their current lineup. What difference would patching up the few remaining holes make besides further obscuring their naming convention?
290(x)280x 270(x) 265 260x are not using tonga,
Tonga GPU is based on the Tahiti design
I didn't say any of those cards use Tonga. I said "Tonga is based off of Hawaii", and many of the architectural refinements in Tonga are already available in Hawaii and Bonaire. Every 285 review I've read, including the one here on Tom's, has pretty much stated the same, that Tonga is essentially a further refinement of GCN 1.1. They went on to provide many examples of inherited architectural refinements from Hawaii. So I'm not sure where you're getting this "Tonga GPU is based on the Tahiti" from.
spentshells said:
so less heat more performance per watt while using the smaller memory interface while staying within the same generation spells bad news for nv in the performance war.Haven't heard of Maxwell, or something? You're commenting in an article speculating about it, so I find this assertion a little strange.
spentshells said:
When they use the arch refinements with a wider mem interface a la 280x @ 384 or hawaii with 512 the gains should be substantial. with a refined gpu and a wider memory bus they will have the winning lineup.Yaa, I don't think the image compression is going to result in much of a performance boost, if any. If anything its main benefit is maintaining performance on narrower buses and reducing the dependence on wider buses (like Maxwell), so I'm not sure why you're anticipating a big performance benefit from pairing a higher-end Tonga-like GPU with a much wider bus, or why you're anticipating Nvidia having trouble responding to these refinements when they essentially already have. It's not going to make a difference unless it actually needs that additional bandwidth, so I would think the goal of a refresh like you're suggesting would be to reduce the bus width as opposed to maintaining it (a la 285).
dragonsqrrl said:
spentshells said:
dragonsqrrl said:
spentshells said:
dragonsqrrl said:
spentshells said:
Tonga has got this when they implement it all away accross all models.Good luck nv
Tonga is based off of Hawaii, they've already implemented it across most of their current lineup. What difference would patching up the few remaining holes make besides further obscuring their naming convention?
290(x)280x 270(x) 265 260x are not using tonga,
Tonga GPU is based on the Tahiti design
I didn't say any of those cards use Tonga. I said "Tonga is based off of Hawaii", and many of the architectural refinements in Tonga are already available in Hawaii and Bonaire. Every 285 review I've read, including the one here on Tom's, has pretty much stated the same, that Tonga is essentially a further refinement of GCN 1.1. They went on to provide many examples of inherited architectural refinements from Hawaii. So I'm not sure where you're getting this "Tonga GPU is based on the Tahiti" from.
spentshells said:
so less heat more performance per watt while using the smaller memory interface while staying within the same generation spells bad news for nv in the performance war.Haven't heard of Maxwell, or something? You're commenting in an article speculating about it, so I find this assertion a little strange.
spentshells said:
When they use the arch refinements with a wider mem interface a la 280x @ 384 or hawaii with 512 the gains should be substantial. with a refined gpu and a wider memory bus they will have the winning lineup.Yaa, I don't think the image compression is going to result in much of a performance boost, if any. If anything its main benefit is maintaining performance on narrower buses and reducing the dependence on wider buses (like Maxwell), so I'm not sure why you're anticipating a big performance benefit from pairing a higher-end Tonga-like GPU with a much wider bus, or why you're anticipating Nvidia having trouble responding to these refinements when they essentially already have. It's not going to make a difference unless it actually needs that additional bandwidth, so I would think the goal of a refresh like you're suggesting would be to reduce the bus width as opposed to maintaining it (a la 285).
Tonga is not based off hawaii its off tahiti
pitcarin when reviesed will be iceland
hawai xt is going to become hawaii xtx
...okay dude.
"Despite what its specifications may suggest, Tonga is not a spin on the Tahiti GPU in the Radeon R9 280 and 280X. Rather, it is a new and condensed version of the Hawaii GPU in the Radeon R9 290 and 290X."
"In addition, the Radeon R9 285 inherits the 290 series' quad-shader layout, allowing four primitives to be rendered per clock cycle instead of two."
"Of course, Tonga has inherited Hawaii's fixed-function hardware, too, such as TrueAudio (AMD's new audio processor) and project FreeSync (the open-source answer to Nvidia's G-Sync) support."
Tonga is two steps removed from Tahiti, and from an architectural standpoint it's obvious it's inherited a lot from GCN 1.1 (Hawaii, Bonaire).
You are wrong, sorry about that.
pitcarin revised is iceland
tahiti revised is tonga
hawaii xt when revised is hawaii xtx
Same website as the linked article.
http://videocardz.com/51021/amd-gcn-update-iceland-tong...
No prob, it looks like icland is not pitcarin but will replace mobile and low end a la 250(x) and its related. Im wrong all the time just not now.
Bonaire is in fact the gpu used in xbox
custom deal
http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/151367-amd-launches-r...
MASTER... as they say
-
Reply to spentshells
m
0
l
dragonsqrrl
September 9, 2014 4:22:00 PM
spentshells said:
spentshells said:so less heat more performance per watt while using the smaller memory interface while staying within the same generation spells bad news for nv in the performance war.
Haven't heard of Maxwell, or something? You're commenting in an article speculating about it, so I find this assertion a little strange.
I was referring only to tahiti vs tonga for power requirements.
I would deffinately advise you try out google for any of these questions
bonaire is not using tonga revisions as it isn't using the same core (tahiti) but is based on the tech used for xbox and ps4 (xbox at least)
Yer really making a deal out of being told what is what and that isn't the point. Read a little more and you will see what you are saying is off and wrong.
There's obviously some sort of communication barrier happening here, because you seem to be consistently misinterpreting what I'm saying, and apparently (giving you the benefit of the doubt) I'm misinterpreting what you're saying. I never suggested Bonaire used or is based on Tonga... just chronologically that wouldn't make any sense.
And I haven't heard of Bonaire being based off the GPU in the Xbox, that's news to me. Could you provide a source? To my knowledge the GPU in the Xbox is based on GCN 1.0, not 1.1.
I'm not trying to be difficult here, I just really don't think you're right and I'm honestly confused as to why you think Tonga is based on Tahiti when there's been a GCN revision between them, and it shares so many architectural enhancements with Hawaii. There's just so much evidence to the contrary. Could you maybe provide a source says what you're trying to say?
-
Reply to dragonsqrrl
m
0
l
dragonsqrrl
September 9, 2014 4:57:53 PM
spentshells said:
dragonsqrrl said:
spentshells said:
dragonsqrrl said:
spentshells said:
dragonsqrrl said:
spentshells said:
Tonga has got this when they implement it all away accross all models.Good luck nv
Tonga is based off of Hawaii, they've already implemented it across most of their current lineup. What difference would patching up the few remaining holes make besides further obscuring their naming convention?
290(x)280x 270(x) 265 260x are not using tonga,
Tonga GPU is based on the Tahiti design
I didn't say any of those cards use Tonga. I said "Tonga is based off of Hawaii", and many of the architectural refinements in Tonga are already available in Hawaii and Bonaire. Every 285 review I've read, including the one here on Tom's, has pretty much stated the same, that Tonga is essentially a further refinement of GCN 1.1. They went on to provide many examples of inherited architectural refinements from Hawaii. So I'm not sure where you're getting this "Tonga GPU is based on the Tahiti" from.
spentshells said:
so less heat more performance per watt while using the smaller memory interface while staying within the same generation spells bad news for nv in the performance war.Haven't heard of Maxwell, or something? You're commenting in an article speculating about it, so I find this assertion a little strange.
spentshells said:
When they use the arch refinements with a wider mem interface a la 280x @ 384 or hawaii with 512 the gains should be substantial. with a refined gpu and a wider memory bus they will have the winning lineup.Yaa, I don't think the image compression is going to result in much of a performance boost, if any. If anything its main benefit is maintaining performance on narrower buses and reducing the dependence on wider buses (like Maxwell), so I'm not sure why you're anticipating a big performance benefit from pairing a higher-end Tonga-like GPU with a much wider bus, or why you're anticipating Nvidia having trouble responding to these refinements when they essentially already have. It's not going to make a difference unless it actually needs that additional bandwidth, so I would think the goal of a refresh like you're suggesting would be to reduce the bus width as opposed to maintaining it (a la 285).
Tonga is not based off hawaii its off tahiti
pitcarin when reviesed will be iceland
hawai xt is going to become hawaii xtx
...okay dude.
"Despite what its specifications may suggest, Tonga is not a spin on the Tahiti GPU in the Radeon R9 280 and 280X. Rather, it is a new and condensed version of the Hawaii GPU in the Radeon R9 290 and 290X."
"In addition, the Radeon R9 285 inherits the 290 series' quad-shader layout, allowing four primitives to be rendered per clock cycle instead of two."
"Of course, Tonga has inherited Hawaii's fixed-function hardware, too, such as TrueAudio (AMD's new audio processor) and project FreeSync (the open-source answer to Nvidia's G-Sync) support."
Tonga is two steps removed from Tahiti, and from an architectural standpoint it's obvious it's inherited a lot from GCN 1.1 (Hawaii, Bonaire).
You are wrong, sorry about that.
pitcarin revised is iceland
tahiti revised is tonga
hawaii xt when revised is hawaii xtx
Same website as the linked article.
http://videocardz.com/51021/amd-gcn-update-iceland-tong...
No prob, it looks like icland is not pitcarin but will replace mobile and low end a la 250(x) and its related. Im wrong all the time just not now.
Bonaire is in fact the gpu used in xbox
custom deal
http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/151367-amd-launches-r...
MASTER... as they say
omg dude... you're either a noob or you're trolling or something, I can't tell at this point. The quotes I provided came directly from Tom's review of the 285, and reviews from other sites make similar architectural comparisons between Tonga and Hawaii. This is not coming from me, so I think your response would be more appropriate if you wrote "everyone is wrong". You just keep on banging your head into this wall of mounting evidence that I'm providing and you're not giving anything substantive in response. You just keep on saying 'no, you're wrong, I'm right'. I mean, it's like I'm arguing with a child here.
So let me get this straight, your rationale for why Tonga is architecturally based on Tahiti and not Hawaii is simply because it's intended to take the place of Tahiti in AMD's product lineup based on performance characteristics and pricing? Please tell me that's not what you're saying, because if it is you're seriously misguided, and you're completely misinterpreting what I'm saying, and what the article you linked is trying to say. It doesn't say anywhere that Tonga is based on Tahiti, it only says that cards based on Tonga are supposed to slot in at similar price points and performance levels as cards based on Tahiti. It makes no mention of a direct architectural connection. And it's basically saying the same thing about Hawaii and Hawaii XTX. That's totally different from what I'm trying to say, and from what I think you're trying to say.
And the link you provided as 'evidence' that Bonaire is based on the GPU in the Xbox... just wow. The author mentioned that in passing speculation once, and never addressed it again throughout the article. He was speculating dude, nothing more. Notice also that the article is dated about half a year before the launch of the One, in fact he's referring to is as the '720'. And he said he thinks the GPU in the Xbox will be based on Bonaire, not the other way around. What you're saying wouldn't make much sense since Bonaire launched on the desktop well before the launch of the Xbox One.
-
Reply to dragonsqrrl
m
0
l
dragonsqrrl
September 9, 2014 5:35:02 PM
Here's a bit more information for you while you're taking all that in:
http://anandtech.com/show/6837/amd-radeon-7790-review-feat-sapphire-the-first-desktop-sea-islands/2
http://anandtech.com/show/7457/the-radeon-r9-290x-review/2
... which further supports my argument.
http://anandtech.com/show/6837/amd-radeon-7790-review-feat-sapphire-the-first-desktop-sea-islands/2
http://anandtech.com/show/7457/the-radeon-r9-290x-review/2
... which further supports my argument.
-
Reply to dragonsqrrl
m
0
l
juggar
September 9, 2014 6:49:39 PM
Quote:
Quote:
Are GPU's topping out like CPU's did a couple of years ago? Looks like if you bought an i7-2700K and a GTX 780 after the price cut you have gotten the most bang out of your buck then and for the foreseeable future.LOL or if you got a 7970 3 years ago and just overclocked to perform the same as the silly overpriced 780.
Your going to get a 7970 equal in any situation to a 780.....
You do know a stock R9 290 trades blows with one right?
I would know... I just upgraded to an R9 290 from a R9 280X...
My OC 280x firestrike = 7577
My R9 290 stock firestike = 9559
My R9 290 slight OC firestrike = 10051
-
Reply to juggar
m
0
l
StormEye
September 9, 2014 7:21:51 PM
dragonsqrrl said:
spentshells said:
dragonsqrrl said:
spentshells said:
dragonsqrrl said:
spentshells said:
dragonsqrrl said:
spentshells said:
Tonga has got this when they implement it all away accross all models.Good luck nv
Tonga is based off of Hawaii, they've already implemented it across most of their current lineup. What difference would patching up the few remaining holes make besides further obscuring their naming convention?
290(x)280x 270(x) 265 260x are not using tonga,
Tonga GPU is based on the Tahiti design
I didn't say any of those cards use Tonga. I said "Tonga is based off of Hawaii", and many of the architectural refinements in Tonga are already available in Hawaii and Bonaire. Every 285 review I've read, including the one here on Tom's, has pretty much stated the same, that Tonga is essentially a further refinement of GCN 1.1. They went on to provide many examples of inherited architectural refinements from Hawaii. So I'm not sure where you're getting this "Tonga GPU is based on the Tahiti" from.
spentshells said:
so less heat more performance per watt while using the smaller memory interface while staying within the same generation spells bad news for nv in the performance war.Haven't heard of Maxwell, or something? You're commenting in an article speculating about it, so I find this assertion a little strange.
spentshells said:
When they use the arch refinements with a wider mem interface a la 280x @ 384 or hawaii with 512 the gains should be substantial. with a refined gpu and a wider memory bus they will have the winning lineup.Yaa, I don't think the image compression is going to result in much of a performance boost, if any. If anything its main benefit is maintaining performance on narrower buses and reducing the dependence on wider buses (like Maxwell), so I'm not sure why you're anticipating a big performance benefit from pairing a higher-end Tonga-like GPU with a much wider bus, or why you're anticipating Nvidia having trouble responding to these refinements when they essentially already have. It's not going to make a difference unless it actually needs that additional bandwidth, so I would think the goal of a refresh like you're suggesting would be to reduce the bus width as opposed to maintaining it (a la 285).
Tonga is not based off hawaii its off tahiti
pitcarin when reviesed will be iceland
hawai xt is going to become hawaii xtx
...okay dude.
"Despite what its specifications may suggest, Tonga is not a spin on the Tahiti GPU in the Radeon R9 280 and 280X. Rather, it is a new and condensed version of the Hawaii GPU in the Radeon R9 290 and 290X."
"In addition, the Radeon R9 285 inherits the 290 series' quad-shader layout, allowing four primitives to be rendered per clock cycle instead of two."
"Of course, Tonga has inherited Hawaii's fixed-function hardware, too, such as TrueAudio (AMD's new audio processor) and project FreeSync (the open-source answer to Nvidia's G-Sync) support."
Tonga is two steps removed from Tahiti, and from an architectural standpoint it's obvious it's inherited a lot from GCN 1.1 (Hawaii, Bonaire).
You are wrong, sorry about that.
pitcarin revised is iceland
tahiti revised is tonga
hawaii xt when revised is hawaii xtx
Same website as the linked article.
http://videocardz.com/51021/amd-gcn-update-iceland-tong...
No prob, it looks like icland is not pitcarin but will replace mobile and low end a la 250(x) and its related. Im wrong all the time just not now.
Bonaire is in fact the gpu used in xbox
custom deal
http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/151367-amd-launches-r...
MASTER... as they say
omg dude... you're either a noob or you're trolling or something, I can't tell at this point. The quotes I provided came directly from Tom's review of the 285, and reviews from other sites make similar architectural comparisons between Tonga and Hawaii. This is not coming from me, so I think your response would be more appropriate if you wrote "everyone is wrong". You just keep on banging your head into this wall of mounting evidence that I'm providing and you're not giving anything substantive in response. You just keep on saying 'no, you're wrong, I'm right'. I mean, it's like I'm arguing with a child here.
So let me get this straight, your rationale for why Tonga is architecturally based on Tahiti and not Hawaii is simply because it's intended to take the place of Tahiti in AMD's product lineup based on performance characteristics and pricing? Please tell me that's not what you're saying, because if it is you're seriously misguided, and you're completely misinterpreting what I'm saying, and what the article you linked is trying to say. It doesn't say anywhere that Tonga is based on Tahiti, it only says that cards based on Tonga are supposed to slot in at similar price points and performance levels as cards based on Tahiti. It makes no mention of a direct architectural connection. And it's basically saying the same thing about Hawaii and Hawaii XTX. That's totally different from what I'm trying to say, and from what I think you're trying to say.
And the link you provided as 'evidence' that Bonaire is based on the GPU in the Xbox... just wow. The author mentioned that in passing speculation once, and never addressed it again throughout the article. He was speculating dude, nothing more. Notice also that the article is dated about half a year before the launch of the One, in fact he's referring to is as the '720'. And he said he thinks the GPU in the Xbox will be based on Bonaire, not the other way around. What you're saying wouldn't make much sense since Bonaire launched on the desktop well before the launch of the Xbox One.
Alright, you don't like being wrong, I get that, look around for yourself.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/microsoft-xbox-one-...
Pretty tired of this. You seem to think repeating what you think you've read is actually knowing something, it isn't.If you need more information, please I encourage you to use google.
I hope you figure some of this out on your own because you do not know what you are talking about at this time. This is a community not a classroom.
-
Reply to spentshells
m
0
l
- 1 / 2
- 2
- Newest
Related resources
- Low Heaven Benchmark Scores EVGA GTX 670 4GB? Forum
- Solvedbenchmark score (heaven benchmark 4.0) gtx 670 Forum
- GTX 780 SC ACX - Normal score for Heaven Benchmark? Forum
- SolvedGTX 275 Low benchmarking Scores Forum
- [GTX 670] Low Heaven Benchmark Score Forum
- SLI-ing two GTX 460s and the Benchmark score Forum
- GTX 460 very low Graphics benchmark score - help? Forum
- More resources
!