Lavaughn Burnside :
Convertxtodvd.. I don't plan to overclock.. what are your views on the build i put together?
According to the
ConvertXtoDVD website, the system requirements don't really make me think you would actually benefit from an FX-6300.
If I'm right on that, then you would be limited to single threaded processing from your FX, which is just barely above the performance rate of the i3-4150. If I'm wrong, the FX will outperform the i3 significantly, especially when you compare OC'ed results of both CPUs (three cores with multi/hyper-threading versus two).
Honestly, I think your posted build sheet is quite good, for an AMD build in that price range. I would recommend getting the G.Skill Sniper memory over the Corsair memory you posted, for cost reasons; but otherwise, the build is quite solid for an AMD rig. For gaming, the FX will not give you a performance edge over the i3 (unless you play newer games with multi/hyper-threading enabled). For video conversions, if look around for software that does support MT/HT, then the FX might be worth it; otherwise, if you stick with your current software, I think the i3 will give you extra performance; although, I'm not entirely sure how much. Get whatever build you feel will benefit you the most.
The reason I currently prefer Intel chips is because of their efficiency, lower heat output, better OC'ing capabilities, and the Z97 Motherboards will support the future Broadwell chips. With AMD, I'm not entirely sure if their next line of CPUs will be supported on the same socket/MoBo; or if they will really be much of an improvement at all. The last FX release was a complete let down for me, so I'm sceptical on their next CPU release. If you don't really care about potential upgrades, or you have no plans to upgrade in the near future, then the AMD build should suit you well. If you want room for future upgrades, then I'd go with Intel (and swap out the motherboard for the
MSI Z97 if you want to have room for a Broadwell upgrade)