Well, I believe is quite normal that they compare only mid/high end monitors. There are also facts to not include low priced monitors, some mid end monitors will lower their price, and also there are loads of monitors low price and quite few high priced ones.
I recently bought an Asus Rog Swift 278Q, in paper is a great Gaming monitor but if you are considering on buying hear this first: I bought one, found 4 spots with bright pixels, and read ASUS warranty, Spanish Legal System and European Laws. In all 3 documents, there is no option to misunderstanding: The bright (not dead) pixels I have, means immediate change. You could expect that from a monitor incredibly expensive that is ROG and also ASUS. (Supposedly have quality)
As you can imagine right now. They are giving me a really hard time and annoying me so much that I refused dealing with them anymore, I have ended sending it back to the re-seller for complete refund (that will not be happy with ASUS, but European laws protect me as consumer). After that I know that ASUS has the worst possible consumer service ever... I would name it "screw the consumer service", they are in another country, sending me loads of stupid emails. 5 phone calls, 2 online chats and 10 emails latter... I have decided never, NEVER buy anything from ASUS again and I know that If my ASUS 980 G.C. gets broken during warranty period I will have to administratively sue them to get my warranty. (I really love Europe
. Don’t know if other countries have same systems. I feel bad for having paid so much top dollar for a brand like that, if I had known... Now I know, and you too.
No matter how good the monitor is, if you spend a lot of money and got a broken monitor like mine believe me, much better a Benq of 100$... much much better.
So, now I would like to have a chart of administrative sues against customer service to make my shopping in expensive products. But I know that’s impossible
. But paying more is not an insurance of quality anymore.