I mean, it just has to be G-sync that makes games much smoother with below 60FP/s. But is it really?
I just had a 144Hz monitor with G-Sync, which I returned, because it was 1080p at 27", and small text was just too blurry for me, I couldn't stand it, it made my eyes hurt.
And after I plugged back in my old monitor, games just look so stuttery and laggy. It has just about the same response time (1ms difference) and the same resolution
So what I am wondering, for trying to figure out if I should ditch G-Sync or Higher refresh rates, or neither. G-Sync is very expensive to buy, and knowing that there is FreeSync for AMD, doesn't make this easier -
Is Over 60Hz a worthwhile thing when you have G-Sync?
Does 120/144Hz monitors make image smoother at framerates of 50-60FP/s avg.
I just had a 144Hz monitor with G-Sync, which I returned, because it was 1080p at 27", and small text was just too blurry for me, I couldn't stand it, it made my eyes hurt.
And after I plugged back in my old monitor, games just look so stuttery and laggy. It has just about the same response time (1ms difference) and the same resolution
So what I am wondering, for trying to figure out if I should ditch G-Sync or Higher refresh rates, or neither. G-Sync is very expensive to buy, and knowing that there is FreeSync for AMD, doesn't make this easier -
Is Over 60Hz a worthwhile thing when you have G-Sync?
Does 120/144Hz monitors make image smoother at framerates of 50-60FP/s avg.